Background It is unclear whether the patatin‐like phospholipase domain‐containing protein 3 (PNPLA3) rs738409 C‐to‐G single nucleotide polymorphism, resulting in the substitution of isoleucine to methionine at position 148 (I148M), impedes regression of hepatic steatosis when treating non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Objectives Investigate if carriage of the PNPLA3 148M allele affects the anti‐steatotic efficacy of all possible anti‐NAFLD interventions, identify gaps in current knowledge and provide guidance for individual treatment. Methods Research available in public databases was searched up to 13 November 2022. Studies were included if a treatment in NAFLD patients decreased hepatic steatosis in the pooled patient group or a PNPLA3 I148M polymorphism subgroup (II/IM/MM). The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk‐Of‐Bias 2 Tool and the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Results Moderate evidence indicates that NAFLD patients homozygous for the PNPLA3 148M allele benefit less or not at all from omega‐3 carboxylic acids to decrease liver fat, while the PNPLA3 148I allele shows moderate benefit. Low evidence suggests that interventions employing lifestyle changes are more effective to reduce liver fat in NAFLD patients homozygous for the PNPLA3 148M allele compared to patients with wild‐type PNPLA3. Conclusions NAFLD patients homozygous for the PNPLA3 148M allele might not benefit from omega‐3 carboxylic acids to reduce hepatic steatosis in contrast to patients with wild‐type PNPLA3. Instead, patients with two PNPLA3 148M alleles should be especially advised to adopt lifestyle changes. Genotyping for PNPLA3 I148M should be encouraged in therapeutic studies for NAFLD. Registration Number (Prospero) CRD42022375028.
Although most same-stage non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients exhibit similar histologic sequelae, the underlying mechanisms appear to be highly heterogeneous. Therefore, it was recently proposed to redefine NAFLD to metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) in which other known causes of liver disease such as alcohol consumption or viral hepatitis do not need to be excluded. Revised nomenclature envisions speeding up and facilitating anti-MAFLD drug development by means of patient stratification whereby each subgroup would benefit from distinct pharmacological interventions. As human-based in vitro research fulfils an irrefutable step in drug development, action should be taken as well in this stadium of the translational path. Indeed, most established in vitro NAFLD models rely on short-term exposure to fatty acids and use lipid accumulation as a phenotypic benchmark. This general approach to a seemingly ambiguous disease such as NAFLD therefore no longer seems applicable. Human-based in vitro models that accurately reflect distinct disease subgroups of MAFLD should thus be adopted in early preclinical disease modeling and drug testing. In this review article, we outline considerations for setting up translational in vitro experiments in the MAFLD era and allude to potential strategies to implement MAFLD heterogeneity into an in vitro setting so as to better align early drug development with future clinical trial designs.
Background and aims: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a life-threatening stage of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) for which no drugs have been approved. We have previously shown that human-derived hepatic in vitro models can be used to mimic key cellular mechanisms involved in the progression of NASH. In the present study, we first characterize the transcriptome of multiple in vitro NASH models. Subsequently, we investigate how elafibranor, which is a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-α/δ agonist that has recently failed a phase 3 clinical trial as a potential anti-NASH compound, modulates the transcriptome of these models. Finally, we compare the elafibranor-induced gene expression modulation to transcriptome data of patients with improved/resolved NAFLD/NASH upon bariatric surgery, which is the only proven clinical NASH therapy. Methods: Human whole genome microarrays were used for the transcriptomics evaluation of hepatic in vitro models. Comparison to publicly available clinical datasets was conducted using multiple bioinformatic application tools. Results: Primary human hepatocytes (PHH), HepaRG, and human skin stem cell-derived hepatic progenitors (hSKP-HPC) exposed to NASH-inducing triggers exhibit up to 35% overlap with datasets of liver samples from NASH patients. Exposure of the in vitro NASH models to elafibranor partially reversed the transcriptional modulations, predicting an inhibition of toll-like receptor (TLR)-2/4/9-mediated inflammatory responses, NFκB-signaling, hepatic fibrosis, and leukocyte migration. These transcriptomic changes were also observed in the datasets of liver samples of patients with resolved NASH. Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptor Alpha (PPARA), PPARG Coactivator 1 Alpha (PPARGC1A), and Sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) were identified as the major common upstream regulators upon exposure to elafibranor. Analysis of the downstream mechanistic networks further revealed that angiopoietin Like 4 (ANGPTL4), pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 4 (PDK4), and perilipin 2 (PLIN2), which are involved in the promotion of hepatic lipid accumulation, were also commonly upregulated by elafibranor in all in vitro NASH models. Contrarily, these genes were not upregulated in liver samples of patients with resolved NASH. Conclusion: Transcriptomics comparison between in vitro NASH models exposed to elafibranor and clinical datasets of NAFLD patients after bariatric surgery reveals commonly modulated anti-inflammatory responses, but discordant modulations of key factors in lipid metabolism. This discordant adverse effect of elafibranor deserves further investigation when assessing PPAR-α/δ agonism as a potential anti-NASH therapy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.