No abstract

The results of surgical treatment of posterior tibial tendon insufficiency (PTTI) may be different at different stages of the disease. No single study has compared the results at different stages. This comparison can be helpful to the patient and physician if the patient asks "What if I wait and the disease progresses, how will my results be different?" A preliminary study comparing results for stage IIa, stage IIb (advanced stage II), and stage III was performed followed by a larger study comparing IIa and IIb with 26 and 22 patients, respectively. American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) outcome scores as well as radiographs and functional questions were used. Nearly all patients, regardless of stage, felt they were helped by surgical treatment. However, the lowest AOFAS score was in stage III, the most advanced stage investigated in this study. In comparing stage IIa and IIb patients, stage IIb patients had a statistically higher incidence of lateral discomfort. Although statistically significant differences were not found in all comparisons, this study suggests that the results of surgical treatment for PTTI declines with increasing stage or severity of disease.

No abstract

The purpose of our study was to determine whether endoscopic plantar fasciotomy is a safe and effective operation in this patient population. We reviewed our surgical results following endoscopic plantar fasciotomy in sixteen patients (twenty feet) with an average preoperative duration of symptoms of four years. Of the 20 feet, 9 had complete relief of pain while symptoms were improved in nine feet. One patient with bilateral symptoms had no relief in either foot. The average AOFAS hindfoot score improved from 62 to 80, a statistically significant difference. Unilateral patients did better than bilateral with no bilateral patients reporting complete resolution of symptoms. There were no iatrogenic nerve injuries. On the basis of our review, we recommend endoscopic plantar fasciotomy as an alternative to open plantar fascial release for those patients with recalcitrant heel pain.

The only surgery without risk of complications is the one not performed. Shared decision-making (SDM) offers a process which can help a physician and patient move beyond passive informed consent to a more collaborative, patient-centered experience. By offering a balanced review of conservative and invasive treatment options, including the option of observation only, SDM provides patients an opportunity to express their personal values and goals in the context of health decisions. Thus, when the patient decides to accept the inherent risks of surgery, there has truly been an opportunity to understand and discuss all treatment alternatives.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract