About a third of patients with ovarian cancer present with localized disease; despite surgical resection, up to half the tumors recur. Since it has not been established whether adjuvant treatment can benefit such patients, we conducted two prospective, randomized national cooperative trials of adjuvant therapy in patients with localized ovarian carcinoma (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stages Ia to IIc). All patients underwent surgical resection plus comprehensive staging and, 18 months later, surgical re-exploration. In the first trial, 81 patients with well-differentiated or moderately well differentiated cancers confined to the ovaries (Stages Iai and Ibi) were assigned to receive either no chemotherapy or melphalan (0.2 mg per kilogram of body weight per day for five days, repeated every four to six weeks for up to 12 cycles). After a median follow-up of more than six years, there were no significant differences between the patients given no chemotherapy and those treated with melphalan with respect to either five-year disease-free survival (91 vs. 98 percent; P = 0.41) or overall survival (94 vs. 98 percent; P = 0.43). In the second trial, 141 patients with poorly differentiated Stage I tumors or with cancer outside the ovaries but limited to the pelvis (Stage II) were randomly assigned to treatment with either melphalan (in the same regimen as above) or a single intraperitoneal dose of 32P (15 mCi) at the time of surgery. In this trial (median follow-up, greater than 6 years) the outcomes for the two treatment groups were similar with respect to five-year disease-free survival (80 percent in both groups) and overall survival (81 percent with melphalan vs. 78 percent with 32P; P = 0.48). We conclude that in patients with localized ovarian cancer, comprehensive staging at the time of surgical resection can serve to identify those patients (as defined by the first trial) who can be followed without adjuvant chemotherapy. The remaining patients with localized ovarian cancer should receive adjuvant therapy, and with adjuvant melphalan or intraperitoneal 32P should have a five-year disease-free survival of about 80 percent.
A randomized clinical trial was conducted in women with bulky (suboptimal) Stage III and Stage IV ovarian carcinoma, using doxorubicin (Adriamycin) and cyclophosphamide with or without cisplatin. There were 440 evaluable cases, of which 227 had measurable disease. One hundred twenty of these latter patients were treated with cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin (CA), while 107 received cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and cisplatin (CAP). The clinical complete response (CR) rate for CA was 26% (31/120) compared with 51% (55/107) for CAP (P = less than 0.0001). Of 23 CRs receiving CA who had a second-look laparotomy, only four were negative; of 39 CRs receiving CAP and a second-look, 13 were negative (not statistically significant). The response duration for patients with measurable disease (median 14.6 versus 8.8 months), progression-free interval for all patients (13.1 versus 7.7 months), and survival for patients with measurable disease (19.7 versus 15.7 months) showed a statistically significant advantage for CAP; however, there was no difference in survival of patients with nonmeasurable disease. Toxicity was more severe with CAP but was tolerable. Thus, the addition of cisplatin improves the chemotherapy of advanced ovarian carcinoma.
Struma ovarii has elicited considerable interest because of its many unique features since Ludwig Pick first elucidated its relationship to teratoma in the early part of the 20th century. In this article, we report 3 cases of papillary and 1 of follicular thyroid carcinoma; 2 of these cases were associated with mature cystic teratoma. Metastases occurred in 2 patients, and 1 died of neoplasm. In regard to the occurrence of thyroid-type carcinoma in struma ovarii, precise terminology should be used, and the expression malignant struma ovarii was avoided as a diagnostic term. Upon review of the literature, papillary carcinoma and follicular carcinoma are the most frequent types of malignancy to occur in ovarian struma; other forms of thyroid carcinoma occur only rarely. The diagnostic criteria for cases of papillary carcinoma are similar to those described in the cervical thyroid gland and are based primarily on nuclear and architectural features. In reference to follicular carcinoma, invasion into the surrounding ovarian tissue, vascular invasion, or metastasis is evidence of malignancy. Histological malignancy in a struma does not necessarily equate with biological malignancy, and the majority of thyroid-type carcinomas do not spread beyond the ovary. Occasionally, metastases of ovarian struma have an innocuous histological appearance, and such cases are referred to as highly differentiated follicular carcinoma of ovarian origin (HDFCO). Because its histological appearance resembles that of nonneoplastic thyroid, HDFCO characteristically cannot be diagnosed until the neoplasm spreads beyond the ovary. In this article, we apply the term typical thyroid carcinoma to those forms of thyroid malignancy arising in ovarian struma that closely resemble the types described in the cervical thyroid gland to distinguish them from HDFCO. Typical follicular carcinoma is more aggressive than the somewhat more common papillary carcinoma, and HDFCO is the least aggressive of these tumor types. Cases of thyroid-type carcinoma arising in the ovary sometimes lack evidence of preexisting struma. The more aggressive thyroid-type neoplasms can arise in thyroid tissue within a mature cystic teratoma, or they may overgrow and replace the struma. Primary thyroid-type carcinoma must be distinguished from rare instances of ovarian metastases that originate in the cervical thyroid gland and the less differentiated forms from other ovarian neoplasms such as clear cell adenocarcinoma and tumors with an oxyphilic appearance. In the differential diagnosis with other ovarian neoplasms, cases of thyroid-type carcinoma associated with strumal carcinoid should not be diagnosed as malignant strumal carcinoid because the latter diagnosis might lead to suboptimal therapy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.