Prospective case series, Level IV.

No abstract

No abstract

Background: A rupture of the distal biceps tendon is the most common tendon rupture of the elbow and has received increased attention in the past few years. Newly developed all-suture anchors have the potential to minimize surgical trauma and the risk of adverse events because of the use of flexible drills and smaller drill diameters. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to biomechanically compare all-suture anchors and titanium suture anchors for distal biceps tendon repair in cadaveric specimens. The hypothesis was that all-suture anchors would show no differences in load to failure or displacement under cyclic loading compared with titanium suture anchors. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Sixteen unpaired, fresh-frozen human cadaveric elbows were randomized to 2 groups, which underwent onlay distal biceps tendon repair with 2 anchors. Bone mineral density at the radial tuberosity was evaluated in each specimen. In the first group, distal biceps tendon repair was performed using all-suture anchors. In the second group, titanium suture anchors were applied. After cyclic loading for 3000 cycles, the repair constructs were loaded to failure. The peak load to failure as well as repair construct stiffness and mode of failure were determined. Results: The mean (±SD) peak load was 293.53 ± 122.15 N for all-suture anchors and 280.02 ± 69.34 N for titanium suture anchors ( P = .834); mean stiffness was 19.78 ± 2.95 N/mm and 19.30 ± 4.98 N/mm, respectively ( P = .834). The mode of failure was anchor pullout for all specimens during load to failure. At the proximal position, all-suture anchors showed a displacement of 1.53 ± 0.80 mm, and titanium suture anchors showed a displacement of 0.81 ± 0.50 mm ( P = .021) under cyclic loading. At the distal position, a displacement of 1.86 ± 1.04 mm for all-suture anchors and 1.53 ± 1.15 mm for titanium suture anchors was measured ( P = .345). A positive correlation between bone mineral density and load to failure was observed ( r = 0.605; P = .013). Conclusion: All-suture anchors were biomechanically equivalent at time zero to titanium suture anchors for onlay distal biceps tendon repair. While the proximally placed all-suture anchors demonstrated greater displacement than titanium suture anchors, the comparable displacement at the distal position as well as the similar load and mechanism of failure make this difference unlikely to be clinically significant. Clinical Relevance: All-suture anchors performed similarly to titanium suture anchors for onlay distal biceps tendon repair at time zero and represent a reasonable alternative.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of acute posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) lesions in multiple injured knees that were surgically treated with internal bracing. Methods Acute complete PCL lesions in multiple injured knees with subsequent internal‐bracing treatment within 21 days between 2014 and 2016 were eligible for inclusion. At final follow‐up, patients were assessed with Tegner, Lysholm, and IKDC scores. PCL stability and healing were verified with KT‐2000, stress radiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Results Fourteen patients [mean age 37.4 (± 17.8; SD) years] were evaluated after a mean follow‐up of 19.9 (± 7.7; SD) months. Thirteen patients suffered complete lesions of the PCL with concomitant ligamentous injuries (Schenck I: six cases, Schenck III M: five cases, Schenck IV N: one case, Schenck V: one case). Median Tegner, mean Lysholm and mean IKDC scores at follow‐up were 4 (2–7; interquartile range), 69.1 (± 16.6; SD) and 68.9 (± 18.1; SD) respectively. Posterior translation averaged 5.8 (± 2.2; SD) mm with the KT 2000 and stress radiography showed a mean posterior tibial translation of 5.5 (± 4.1; SD) mm in the side to side comparison. MRI showed adequate PCL healing. Conclusions Internal bracing as treatment for acute PCL ruptures in multiple injured knees showed adequate restoration of posterior tibial translation in a single‐centre study including 14 cases. Level of evidence IV.

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair augmented using subacromial bursa, concentrated bone marrow aspirate (cBMA), and platelet-rich plasma. Methods: Sixteen patients were included in the study who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair augmented using subacromial bursa, cBMA, and platelet-rich plasma from January 2018 to July 2018 and had a minimum 1-year follow-up. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Simple Shoulder Test, Constant-Murley, and Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) scores were collected preoperatively and at terminal follow-up. To determine the clinical relevance of ASES scores, the minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and the patient acceptable symptomatic state thresholds were used. In vitro cellular proliferation of subacromial bursa (nucleated cells/gram) and cBMA (nucleated cells and colony-forming units/cc) samples was evaluated and correlated to clinical outcomes scores. Results: Mean follow-up was 12.6 AE 1.8 months (range 12-19 months). Patients achieved significant improvement in ASES (45.8AE22.5 pre vs 88.5 AE 14.6 post, D44.7

Background: The concept of dynamic anterior shoulder stabilization (DAS) combines a Bankart repair with the additional sling effect of the long head of the biceps (LHB) tendon to treat anterior glenohumeral instability. This surgical technique was created to close the gap between the indications for isolated Bankart repair and those requiring bone transfer techniques. Purpose: To biomechanically investigate the stabilizing effects of the DAS technique in comparison with the standard Bankart repair in different defect models. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Twenty-four fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders (mean ± SD age, 60.1 ± 8.6 years) were mounted in a 6 degrees of freedom shoulder testing system. With cross-sectional area ratios, the rotator cuff muscles and LHB tendon were loaded with 40 N and 10 N, respectively. Anterior and inferior glenohumeral translation was tested in 60° of abduction and 60° of external rotation (ABER position) while forces of 20 N, 30 N, and 40 N were applied to the scapula in the posterior direction. Total translation and relative translation in relation to the native starting position were measured with a 3-dimensional digitizer. Maximal external rotation and internal rotation after application of 1.5-N·m torque to the humerus were measured. All specimens went through 4 conditions (intact, defect, isolated Bankart repair, DAS) and were randomized to 1 of 3 defect groups (isolated Bankart lesion, 10% anterior glenoid defect, 20% anterior glenoid defect). The DAS was performed by transferring the LHB tendon through a subscapularis split to the anterior glenoid margin, where it was fixed with an interference screw. Results: Both surgical techniques resulted in decreased anterior glenohumeral translation in comparison with the defect conditions in all defect groups. As compared with isolated Bankart repair, DAS showed significantly less relative anterior translation in 10% glenoid defects at translation forces of 20 N (0.3 ± 1.7 mm vs 2.2 ± 1.8 mm, P = .005) and 30 N (2.6 ± 3.4 mm vs 5.3 ± 4.2 mm, P = .044) and in 20% glenoid defects at all translation forces (20 N: –3.2 ± 4.7 mm vs 0.8 ± 4.1 mm, P = .024; 30 N: –0.9 ± 5.3 mm vs 4.0 ± 5.2 mm, P = .005; 40 N: 2.1 ± 6.6 mm vs 6.0 ± 5.7 mm, P = .035). However, in 20% defects, DAS led to a relevant posterior and inferior shift of the humeral head in the ABER position and to a relevant increase in inferior glenohumeral translation. Both surgical techniques did not limit the rotational range of motion. Conclusion: In the context of minor glenoid bone defects, the DAS technique demonstrates less relative anterior translation as compared with an isolated Bankart repair at time zero. Clinical Relevance: The new DAS technique seems capable of closing the gap between the indications for isolated Bankart repair and bone transfer techniques.

Background: In cases of acute combined posteromedial and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, primary repair of the superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL) and posterior oblique ligament (POL) with suture tape augmentation may be a reasonable alternative to standard tendon reconstruction techniques. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to examine the rotational and valgus laxity with ACL strain following sMCL and POL repair with suture tape augmentation at various degrees of knee flexion. It was hypothesized that this technique would restore knee laxity and kinematics comparable with those of the intact state. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Ten cadaveric knee specimens (mean ± SD, 57.9 ± 5.9 years) were obtained. Specimens were tested with the tibia fixed and the femur mobile on an X-Y table. Each specimen was tested in 4 conditions according to the state of the sMCL and POL: native, deficient, repaired with suture tape augmentation, and reconstructed with tendon allografts. Valgus laxity was tested with 40-N force applied in the lateral direction of the femur, and rotational motion was tested with 5-N torque applied to the tibia. ACL strain during valgus stress was also measured. Each condition was tested in 0°, 15°, 30°, 45°, and 60° of knee flexion. Results: Dissection of the sMCL and POL led to significantly increased valgus laxity in all flexion angles, with a significant increase in ACL strain at 30° ( P < .001) and 45° ( P < .001). Ligament repair with suture tape augmentation demonstrated similar valgus and rotational laxity as compared with intact specimens, with the exception of increased internal rotation at 30° ( P = .005). Ligament reconstruction resulted in significantly increased valgus opening at 45° ( P = .048) and significantly increased internal rotation at 30° ( P < .001) as compared with the native state. Direct comparison between surgical techniques showed no significant differences. Conclusion: At time zero, ligament repair of the posteromedial knee with suture tape augmentation restored close-to-native valgus and rotatory laxity, as well as native ACL strain for cases of complete sMCL and POL avulsion. Clinical Relevance: Ligament repair of the sMCL and POL with suture tape augmentation may be a reasonable alternative to tendon reconstruction techniques in cases of acute combined posteromedial and ACL injuries with valgus and rotatory instability.