IntroductionThe endothelial specific angiopoietin (Ang)-Tie2 ligand-receptor system has been identified as a non-redundant mediator of endothelial activation in experimental sepsis. Binding of circulating Ang-1 to the Tie2 receptor protects the vasculature from inflammation and leakage, whereas binding of Ang-2 antagonises Tie2 signalling and disrupts endothelial barrier function. Here, we examine whether circulating Ang-1 and/or Ang-2 independently predict mortality in a cohort of critically ill medical patients.MethodsCirculating vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), Ang-1 and Ang-2 were prospectively measured in sera from 29 healthy controls and 43 medical ICU patients by immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) and ELISA, respectively. Survival after 30 days was the primary outcome studied.ResultsMedian serum Ang-2 concentrations were increasingly higher across the following groups: healthy controls, patients without sepsis, patients with sepsis and patients with septic shock. In contrast, Ang-1 and VEGF concentrations were significantly lower in all patient groups compared with healthy controls. Ang-2 correlated with partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2), tissue hypoxia, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score. Multivariate Cox regression analyses confirmed a strong independent prognostic impact of high Ang-2 as a novel marker of 30-day survival.ConclusionsA marked imbalance of the Ang-Tie system in favour of Ang-2 is present in critically ill medical patients. Our findings highlight the independent prognostic impact of circulating Ang-2 in critical illness. Ang-2 may be used as a readily available powerful predictor of outcome and may open new perspectives to individualise treatment in the ICU.
Ang-2 may be involved in the pathogenesis of IPAH, and plasma Ang-2 might serve as a promising new biomarker of disease severity and response to treatment in patients with IPAH.
IntroductionNeutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) is a promising novel biomarker that correlates with the severity and outcome of acute kidney injury (AKI). However, its prognostic utility during the late course of AKI, especially in patients that require renal replacement therapy (RRT) remains unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of serum NGAL in patients with established AKI at inception of RRT in the intensive care unit (ICU).MethodsSerum NGAL (ELISA methodology) was measured in 109 critically ill patients with AKI at inception of RRT in 7 ICUs of a tertiary care university hospital. The primary outcome studied was 28-day mortality. Secondary outcome measures were ICU length of stay, ventilator-free days, and renal recovery at day 28.ResultsThere was a significant difference in serum NGAL between healthy subjects (median [interquartile range] 39.0 [37.5-42.75] ng/mL), critically ill patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) (297 [184-490] ng/mL), and critically ill patients with sepsis (708 [365-1301] ng/mL; P < 0.0001), respectively. Multiple linear regression showed that NGAL levels were independently related to the severity of AKI and the extent of systemic inflammation. NGAL levels were higher in non-survivors (430 [303-942] ng/mL) compared to survivors (298 [159-506] ng/mL; P = 0.004). Consistently, Cox proportional hazards regression analysis identified NGAL as a strong independent predictor for 28-day survival (hazard ratio 1.6 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15 - 2.23), P = 0.005).ConclusionsThis is the first prospective evaluation of serum NGAL as an outcome-specific biomarker in critically ill patients at initiation of RRT. The results from this study indicate that serum NGAL is as an independent predictor of 28-day mortality in ICU patients with dialysis-dependent AKI.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.