At our institution, 2 of the initial 7 pregnant patients with confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 severe infection (28.6%; 95% CI, 8.2% e64.1%) developed cardiac dysfunction with moderately reduced left ventricular ejection fractions of 40%e45% and hypokinesis. Viral myocarditis and cardiomyopathy have also been reported in nonpregnant coronavirus disease 2019 patients. A case series of nonpregnant patients with coronavirus disease 2019 found that 33% of those in intensive care developed cardiomyopathy. More data are needed to ascertain the incidence of cardiomyopathy from coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy, in all pregnant women with coronavirus disease 2019, and those with severe disease (eg, pneumonia). We suggest an echocardiogram in pregnant women with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia, in particular those necessitating oxygen, or those who are critically ill, and we recommend the use of handheld, point-of-care devices where possible to minimize contamination of staff and traditional large echocardiogram machines.
Summary Background Ursodeoxycholic acid is commonly used to treat intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, yet its largest trial detected minimal benefit for a composite outcome (stillbirth, preterm birth, and neonatal unit admission). We aimed to examine whether ursodeoxycholic acid affects specific adverse perinatal outcomes. Methods In this systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Global Health, MIDIRS, and Cochrane without language restrictions for relevant articles published between database inception, and Jan 1, 2020, using search terms referencing intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, ursodeoxycholic acid, and perinatal outcomes. Eligible studies had 30 or more study participants and reported on at least one individual with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and bile acid concentrations of 40 μmol/L or more. We also included two unpublished cohort studies. Individual participant data were collected from the authors of selected studies. The primary outcome was the prevalence of stillbirth, for which we anticipated there would be insufficient data to achieve statistical power. Therefore, we included a composite of stillbirth and preterm birth as a main secondary outcome. A mixed-effects meta-analysis was done using multi-level modelling and adjusting for bile acid concentration, parity, and multifetal pregnancy. Individual participant data analyses were done for all studies and in different subgroups, which were produced by limiting analyses to randomised controlled trials only, singleton pregnancies only, or two-arm studies only. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42019131495. Findings The authors of the 85 studies fulfilling our inclusion criteria were contacted. Individual participant data from 6974 women in 34 studies were included in the meta-analysis, of whom 4726 (67·8%) took ursodeoxycholic acid. Stillbirth occurred in 35 (0·7%) of 5097 fetuses among women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy treated with ursodeoxycholic acid and in 12 (0·6%) of 2038 fetuses among women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy not treated with ursodeoxycholic acid (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1·04, 95% CI 0·35–3·07; p=0·95). Ursodeoxycholic acid treatment also had no effect on the prevalence of stillbirth when considering only randomised controlled trials (aOR 0·29, 95% CI 0·04–2·42; p=0·25). Ursodeoxycholic acid treatment had no effect on the prevalence of the composite outcome in all studies (aOR 1·28, 95% CI 0·86–1·91; p=0·22), but was associated with a reduced composite outcome when considering only randomised controlled trials (0·60, 0·39–0·91; p=0·016). Interpretation Ursodeoxycholic acid treatment had no significant effect on the prevalence of stillbirth in women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, but our analysis was probably limited by the low overall event rate. However, when consideri...
Background Ursodeoxycholic acid is commonly used to treat intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, yet its largest trial detected minimal benefit for a composite outcome (stillbirth, preterm birth, and neonatal unit admission). We aimed to examine whether ursodeoxycholic acid affects specific adverse perinatal outcomes.Methods In this systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Global Health, MIDIRS, and Cochrane without language restrictions for relevant articles published between database inception, and Jan 1, 2020, using search terms referencing intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, ursodeoxycholic acid, and perinatal outcomes. Eligible studies had 30 or more study participants and reported on at least one individual with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and bile acid concentrations of 40 µmol/L or more. We also included two unpublished cohort studies. Individual participant data were collected from the authors of selected studies. The primary outcome was the prevalence of stillbirth, for which we anticipated there would be insufficient data to achieve statistical power. Therefore, we included a composite of stillbirth and preterm birth as a main secondary outcome. A mixed-effects meta-analysis was done using multi-level modelling and adjusting for bile acid concentration, parity, and multifetal pregnancy. Individual participant data analyses were done for all studies and in different subgroups, which were produced by limiting analyses to randomised controlled trials only, singleton pregnancies only, or two-arm studies only. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42019131495. FindingsThe authors of the 85 studies fulfilling our inclusion criteria were contacted. Individual participant data from 6974 women in 34 studies were included in the meta-analysis, of whom 4726 (67•8%) took ursodeoxycholic acid. Stillbirth occurred in 35 (0•7%) of 5097 fetuses among women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy treated with ursodeoxycholic acid and in 12 (0•6%) of 2038 fetuses among women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy not treated with ursodeoxycholic acid (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1•04, 95% CI 0•35-3•07; p=0•95). Ursodeoxycholic acid treatment also had no effect on the prevalence of stillbirth when considering only randomised controlled trials (aOR 0•29, 95% CI 0•04-2•42; p=0•25). Ursodeoxycholic acid treatment had no effect on the prevalence of the composite outcome in all studies (aOR 1•28, 95% CI 0•86-1•91; p=0•22), but was associated with a reduced composite outcome when considering only randomised controlled trials (0•60, 0•39-0•91; p=0•016).Interpretation Ursodeoxycholic acid treatment had no significant effect on the prevalence of stillbirth in women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, but our analysis was probably limited by the low overall event rate. However, when considering only randomised controlled trials, ursodeoxycholic acid was associated with a reduction in stillbirth in combination with pr...
OBJECTIVE: To identify laboratory data that correlates with poor perinatal outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP), admitted for delivery between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2017, was performed. Chi-square, student’s t-test, and ANOVA statistical analysis was performed. The receiver-operator characteristic curves were plotted for the prediction of each category of perinatal outcome and the areas under the curves were determined. All p-values were two-sided, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Analysis of the 61 ICP cases showed no occurrence of the intrauterine fetal demise (IUFD), stillbirth, abruption, or neonatal demise. ROC curve analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation between bile acid and AST levels and perinatal outcomes. A bile acid (BA) level equal to or greater than 37μmol/L strongly predicted spontaneous preterm labor in women affected by ICP with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 60.70% (p = 0.002). A BA level equal to or greater than 42μmol/L strongly predicted meconium-stained amniotic fluid with a sensitivity of 85.70% and specificity of 66.70% (p = 0.006). AST levels equal to or greater than 62 IU/L strongly predicted NICU admission with a sensitivity of 81.30% and specificity of 62.20% (p = 0.002). AST levels equal to or greater than 75 IU/L strongly predicted hyperbilirubinemia in the neonates with a sensitivity of 87.50% and specificity of 69.80% (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is a statistically significant correlation between elevated BA and elevated AST levels and adverse perinatal outcomes.
The case presented is unique in that 2 rare pathologies, bilateral Sertoli cell tumors of the ovary and MRKH syndrome, developed concomitantly in the same patient.
INTRODUCTION: Each year approximately 3,000 deliveries occur at NBIMC labor and delivery. Of these deliveries, approximately 700 begin as inductions of labor. In June of 2016 the primary induction medication was switched from dinoprostone $428.53 per insert to misoprostol $1.85 per induction. The purpose of this project was to determine the outcomes in regard to inductions leading to vaginal birth versus cesarean delivery and estimated expenditures per cervical ripening medication. METHODS: IRB approval was obtained and then a retrospective chart review of all deliveries at NBIMC from January 1st 2016 until December 31st 2016 was performed with an analysis of successful vaginal deliveries for each induction medication versus failed inductions resulting in cesarean deliveries and the indications for cesarean delivery. The data was extrapolated to estimate the approximated savings from changing induction medication and a comparison for reasons for induction failure. RESULTS: There was a no significant difference between the two groups regarding delivery method (misoprostol cesarean delivery 29.72% versus dinoprostone cesarean delivery 35.51%, p-value 0.194). The dinoprostone 10mg vaginal insert was used a single time per induction of labor and cost approximately $428.53. Thus, the 245 inductions had an estimated cost of $104,989.85. In contrast, the misoprostol cervical ripening protocol consisted of misoprostol 25mcg PV for 3 doses followed by misoprostol 50mcg PO for 3 doses. This totaled 225mcg of misoprostol at a cost of $1.85. The total cervical ripening cost of 286 inductions is therefore estimated at $530.35. This is a stark contrast to the single dinoprostone insert costing $428.53. Extrapolating the data to approximately 700 inductions per year: the total cost for dinoprostone would be $299,971 versus misoprostol at $1,295, and the savings from switching to misoprostol would be $298,676. CONCLUSION: Changing the induction cervical ripening medication from dinoprostone to misoprostol has saved the department and NBIMC approximately $298,676 per year with a statistically significant similar successful induction rate. Our study has led to changing our institutions cervical ripening agent to a more cost effective agent with a similar delivery outcome.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.