Abnormal liver enzymes are seen in 20% of hospitalized patients with COVID-19. The etiology of elevated liver enzymes is thought to be multifactorial including medications and underlying liver disease. The true prevalence and clinical significance of underlying chronic liver diseases (CLD) in COVID-19 remains poorly defined. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we included 74 clinical studies that were identified after a thorough literature search across three databases. The prevalence of CLD patients (73 studies, 24,299 patients) was 3% among all COVID-19 patients. The prevalence of CLD patients was similar in COVID-19 positive and negative population (pooled OR 0.79 [95% CI 0.60, 1.05], p = 0.10). The presence of CLD was significantly associated with more severe COVID-19 infection (pooled OR 1.48 [95% CI 1.17, 1.87], p = 0.001) and overall mortality (pooled OR 1.78 [95% CI 1.09, 2.93], p = 0.02). Additionally, there was a non-significant trend noted for increased ICU admissions and need for invasive mechanical ventilation among COVID-19 patients with CLD. To date, the clinical importance of chronic liver diseases among COVID-19 infection has remained undefined. In this novel systematic review and meta-analysis, the presence of underlying chronic liver disease was significantly associated with more severe COVID-19 infections and mortality.

Background & Aims Several recent studies have reported an abnormal liver chemistry profile among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19), although its clinical significance remains unknown. Approach & Results This novel systematic review and meta‐analysis identified six studies of 586 patients delineating liver chemistries among patients with severe/critical illness versus mild cases of COVID‐19 infection. Patients with severe/critical illness with COVID‐19 infection have increased prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD), cerebrovascular disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) as compared to mild cases. A significant association between severe/critical COVID‐19 infections with elevations in aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (pooled mean difference [MD], 11.70 U/L; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.97, 20.43; P = 0.009), elevated total bilirubin (pooled MD, 0.14 mg/dL; 95% CI, 0.06, 0.22; P = 0.0005), and decreased albumin (pooled MD, –0.68 g/L; 95% CI, –0.81, –0.55; P < 0.00001) was noted. There was also a trend toward elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels among these severe cases (pooled MD, 8.84 U/L; 95% CI, –2.28, 19.97; P = 0.12); however, this did not reach statistical significance. More severe/critically ill cases were associated with leukocytosis, neutrophilia, lymphopenia, elevated creatinine kinase, elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and elevated prothrombin time (PT). Conclusions Comorbidities, including CAD, cerebrovascular disease, and COPD, are more prevalent in hospitalized Chinese patients with severe/critical illness from COVID‐19, and these patients are more likely to manifest with abnormal liver chemistries. Further prospective studies are crucial to understand the pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying the hepatic manifestations of the novel COVID‐19 infection and its clinical significance.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is currently one of the leading forms of chronic liver disease, and its rising frequency worldwide has reached epidemic proportions. NAFLD, particularly its progressive variant NASH (non-alcoholic steatohepatitis), can lead to advanced fibrosis, cirrhosis, and HCC. The pathophysiologic mechanisms that contribute to the development and progression of NAFLD and NASH are complex, and as such myriad therapies are under investigation targeting different pathophysiological mechanisms. Incretin-based therapies, including GLP-1RAs and DPP-4 inhibitors and the inhibition of ASK1 pathway have provided two such novel mechanisms in the management of this disease, and will remain focus of this review.

No abstract

The utility of thromboelastography/thromboelastometry currently has unvalidated clinical benefit in the assessment and reversal of coagulopathy among cirrhotic patients as compared to standard coagulation testing. A novel systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in order to assess pooled outcome data among patients receiving thromboelastography/thromboelastometry as compared to standard coagulation testing. As compared to standard coagulation testing, there was a significant reduction in the number of patients requiring pRBC, platelet, and fresh frozen plasma transfusions among thromboelastography/thromboelastometry group with pooled OR 0.53 (95% CI 0.32–0.85; P = 0.009), 0.29 (95% CI 0.12–0.74; P = 0.009), and 0.19 (95% CI 0.12–0.31; P < 0.00001), respectively. Similarly, there was a significant reduction in number of pRBC, platelet, and fresh frozen plasma units transfused in the thromboelastography/thromboelastometry group with pooled MD −1.53 (95% CI −2.86 to −0.21; P = 0.02), −0.57 (95% CI −1.06 to −0.09; P = 0.02), and −2.71 (95% CI −4.34 to −1.07; P = 0.001), respectively. There were significantly decreased total bleeding events with pooled OR 0.54 (95% CI 0.31–0.94; P = 0.03) and amount of intraoperative bleeding during liver transplantation with pooled MD −1.46 (95% CI −2.49 to −0.44; P = 0.005) in the thromboelastography/thromboelastometry group. Overall, there was no significant difference in mortality between groups with pooled OR 0.91 (95% CI 0.63–1.30; P = 0.60). As compared to standard coagulation testing, a thromboelastography/thromboelastometry-guided approach to the assessment and reversal of cirrhotic coagulopathy improves overall number of patients exposed to blood product transfusions, quantity of transfusions, and bleeding events.

Summary Background Cirrhotic coagulopathy is a delicate interplay comprising deficiencies of both procoagulant and anticoagulant factors. Aim To identify the relationship between international normalised ratio [INR] with periprocedural bleeding risk among patients with cirrhosis. Methods Following a thorough database search of the primary literature, 29 studies were targeted for analysis, including 13 276 patients with cirrhosis undergoing indicated procedures. Results There was no significant association between periprocedural bleeding events and pre‐procedural INR [pooled odds ratio 1.52; 95% CI 0.99, 2.33; P = 0.06]. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in mean INR [pooled mean difference 0.05; 95% CI −0.03, 0.13; P = 0.23] upon comparison of patients who either did or did not experience a periprocedural bleeding event. Significant heterogeneity among some studies was primarily fuelled by significant subgroup effects of both specific procedure types performed. Additionally, there were markedly inconsistent transfusion practices across studies. Conclusions INR fails to serve as a significant correlate for periprocedural bleeding events among patients with cirrhosis. Ideally, these new findings will help serve as a springboard for future studies, as well as to minimize transfusion of blood products, which command a myriad of adverse effects among patients with cirrhosis.

No abstract

OBJECTIVES: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score (NFS), fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score, aspartate aminotransferase (AST)-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) score, and AST–alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ratio are noninvasive fibrosis scoring systems for the staging of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease. METHODS: In a large cohort of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, we compared AST–ALT ratio, NFS, FIB-4 score, and APRI score in predicting advanced fibrosis (defined as fibrosis stage ≥ 3) in histologically confirmed African American (AA) and white patients. We identified 907 patients: 677 (74.6%) white and 230 (25.3%) AA patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. RESULTS: Of the 907 patients, 115 (12.8%) patients had advanced fibrosis (stages 3 and 4) in the total cohort: 6 (2.6%) AAs, and 109 (16.2%) whites. In AAs, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (area under the curve) for predicting advanced fibrosis was 0.58 by NFS, 0.86 by APRI score, 0.77 by FIB-4 score, and 0.65 by AST–ALT ratio. In whites, the area under the receiver operating characteristic for predicting advanced fibrosis was 0.82 by NFS, 0.82 by APRI score, 0.88 by FIB-4 score, and 0.76 by AST–ALT ratio. In the AA population, NFS > 0.675, FIB-4 score > 2.67, and APRI score > 1.5 each has a negative predictive value of 98%, whereas the negative predictive values in whites are 91%, 88%, and 85%, respectively. DISCUSSION: Noninvasive fibrosis scoring systems can reliably exclude advanced fibrosis in both AAs and whites and have acceptable discriminatory ability to predict advanced fibrosis in whites. The utility of noninvasive fibrosis scoring systems in predicting advanced fibrosis in AAs needs further validation in a larger multicenter cohort.