Background: Effective postoperative analgesia remains a priority in orthopaedic surgery, but concerns with regard to opioid diversion and misuse have brought overdue attention to improving opioid stewardship. Normative data for postoperative pain and opioid use are needed to guide and balance these dual priorities. We aimed to characterize postoperative pain and opioid use for an archetypal pediatric orthopaedic procedure: closed reduction and percutaneous pinning of a supracondylar humeral fracture. Methods: Children at a single pediatric trauma center who underwent closed reduction and percutaneous pinning of a supracondylar humeral fracture were enrolled and were prospectively followed. Validated pain scores (Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale) and opioid utilization data were collected using an automated text message-based protocol on postoperative days 1 to 7, 10, 14, and 21. Data were analyzed with descriptive and univariate statistics. Results: Eighty-one patients with a mean age (and standard deviation) of 6.1 ± 2.1 years (62% of whom were male) were enrolled, including 53.1% who had Type-II fractures and 46.9% who had Type-III fractures. The mean pain ratings were highest on arrival to the emergency department (3.5 ± 3.5 points) and the morning of postoperative day 1 (3.5 ± 2.4 points). By postoperative day 3, the mean pain rating decreased to <2 (1.8 ± 1.8 points) and the mean opioid doses decreased to <1 dose (0.8 ± 1.2 doses). Postoperative opioid use decreased in parallel to reported pain (r = 0.972; p < 0.001). The interquartile range of opioid use was 1 to 7 doses, and patients used only 24.1% of the prescribed opioids (mean, 4.8 ± 5.6 doses used and 19.8 ± 7.1 doses prescribed). There was no significant difference (p > 0.05) in pain ratings or opioid use by fracture classification, age, or sex. Conclusions: Following closed reduction and percutaneous pinning for supracondylar humeral fracture, pain levels and opioid usage decrease to a clinically unimportant level by postoperative day 3. Patients who report pain scores of ≥6 points following discharge are outliers and should be screened for compartment syndrome or ischemia. Patients used <25% of prescribed opioid medication, suggesting the potential for overprescription and opioid diversion. A prescription for 7 opioid doses after discharge should allow adequate postoperative analgesia in the majority of patients while improving narcotic stewardship. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Background: Although orthopaedic surgeons have been shown to prescribe excessive amounts of opioid analgesics postoperatively, the degree in which surgical trainees contribute to this trend is unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare self-reported opioid-prescribing behavior, factors influencing this behavior, and perceptions of patient opioid utilization and disposal between hand surgeons and trainees. Methods: Attending hand surgeons and trainees in hand, orthopaedic, and plastic surgery programs were invited to participate in a web-based survey including demographic characteristics; self-reported prescribing behavior specific to 4 procedures: open carpal tunnel release, trigger finger release, thumb carpometacarpal arthroplasty, and distal radial fracture open reduction and internal fixation; and perceptions and influencing factors. Analgesic medications were converted to morphine milligram equivalents and were compared across groups of interest using independent t tests or analysis of variance for each procedure. Results: A total of 1,300 respondents (266 attending surgeons, 98 fellows, 708 orthopaedic residents, and 228 plastic surgery residents) were included. Surgeons reported prescribing fewer total morphine milligram equivalents compared with residents for all 4 procedures. Personal experience was the most influential factor for prescribing behavior by surgeons and fellows. Although residents reported that attending surgeon preference was their greatest influence, most reported no direct opioid-related communication with attending surgeons. Conclusions: Residents self-report prescribing significantly higher morphine milligram equivalents for postoperative analgesia following commonly performed hand and wrist surgical procedures than attending surgeons. Poor communication between residents and attending surgeons may contribute to this finding. Residents may benefit from education on opioid prescription, and training programs should encourage direct communication between trainees and attending surgeons.
Fractures of the tibial spine are estimated to occur in 3 per 100,000 children annually, but account for 2 to 5% of pediatric knee injuries with effusion. Although these fractures were historically associated with bicycle accidents, the surge of organized youth sports in recent decades has brought renewed attention to this injury. While minimally displaced fractures can be treated nonoperatively, several techniques have been described for fixation of displaced or comminuted fractures. Sequelae of this injury can include arthrofibrosis, knee instability, and nonunion. Future collaborative endeavors will aim to further identify risk factors for these complications to optimize the treatment of tibial spine fractures in children.
Summary Dentigerous cysts have been described in most domestic species and man. Horses commonly present with a swelling over the temporal region and a draining tract along the proximal pinna. Dentigerous cysts are benign structures, but pose a cosmetic problem and are commonly removed by surgical excision at an early age. This case report describes a horse with a dentigerous cyst that contained 2 easily identifiable dental structures, radiographically and grossly resembling a permanent tooth and its deciduous precursor.
Background: There is a need for improved opioid stewardship in orthopedic surgery through multimodal analgesia strategies. Perioperative administration of ketorolac in children undergoing closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) for displaced supracondylar humerus (SCH) fracture may decrease pain, reduce opioid requirements, and decrease hospitalization costs. Methods: Retrospective case-control investigation of children (aged, 1 to 14) treated with CRPP for closed, modified Gartland type III extension-type SCH fractures at a single children’s hospital between 2011 and 2017. Patients that received ketorolac perioperatively (cases) were randomly matched 1:2 by sex and age (±1 y) with patients that did not receive ketorolac (controls). Data abstraction included demographic and perioperative details including inpatient Wong-Baker FACES pain ratings and analgesic requirements. Analysis included 2-tailed Mann-Whitney U and χ2 tests. Results: In total, 342 patients were studied including 114 cases and 228 controls. Age (mean, 6.2±2.4 y), sex ratio (M:F, 1.28:1), operative time, and number of pins used were equivalent between groups. Mean pain rating at 0 to 29 minutes postoperatively was lower in the ketorolac group (0.7±1.9) than in controls (1.4±2.6, P=0.017), as well as at 30 to 120 minutes postoperatively (1.1±2.3 and 1.7±2.8, respectively, P=0.036), as seen in Figure 1. Patients in the ketorolac group received a lower number of inpatient oxycodone doses (1.0±0.6) than control patients (1.2±0.5, P=0.003). Mean postoperative length-of-stay (LOS) was 50.0% longer for control patients (20.4±11.3 h) than the ketorolac patients (13.6±8.8 h, P<0.001). Ketorolac administration was associated with 40.4% lower inpatient hospitalization cost compared to control patients, providing a 33.8 times return on investment. There was no difference in the 90-day complication rate between patient groups (P=0.905). Conclusions: The complementary administration of ketorolac reduces postoperative pain and opioid use in children with displaced supracondylar humerus fractures. Perioperative ketorolac is also associated with reduced LOS following CRPP for supracondylar humerus fractures and offers significant cost savings opportunities. Level of Evidence: Level 3—Therapeutic: Case-Control Study.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.