This paper presents a study on serendipity or chance encounter in criminal proceedings. Initially, through a bibliographic analysis of the topic, it appears that the better part of legal doctrine believes that proof of a crime related to the main crime being investigated must be admitted. Then, the current jurisprudence of the STF and STJ is analyzed, which dismisses imprisonment as punishment for fortuitous crime and advocate the broad admission of evidence, even if there is no such connection. Subsequently, the judgment of RE 1055941 / SP is analyzed, in which the STF considers the evidence obtained through serendipity as valid evidence. In the end, it was possible to conclude that based on the aforementioned ruling, there needs to be a connection between the infraction sought and the one found casually. It is considered fundamental for the attribution of evidential value to the element found fortuitously the absence of deviation of purpose in the execution of the investigative measure or the clear existence of connection between the infractions. For the development of this article, bibliographical research and review were used, and the analysis of legal doctrine and jurisprudence were fundamental to achieve the objective of the proposed research.
O presente trabalho propõe-se ao estudo da Justiça Restaurativa como novo modelo de administração dos conflitos em matéria penal, a partir do diálogo com a temática dos Direitos Humanos. Considerando os apontamentos da Teoria Crítica do Direito e da Criminologia crítica, situamos a Justiça Restaurativa junto ao Direito Penal mínimo, a partir da introdução de uma racionalidade ética à racionalidade jurídica. Nessa busca, vemos que o modelo da Justiça Restaurativa, modelo em construção, mostra-se como uma das alternativas que propõem uma crítica ao dogmatismo jurídico e ao sistema punitivo, além de devolver a voz aos atores sociais envolvidos no delito, para que, em conjunto, possam pensar nas medidas do dano e na sua subsequente ressignificação. Trata-se o presente estudo de análise empírico-teórica, com a utilização de metodologia quantitativa.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.