Divergent transcription from promoters and enhancers is pervasive in many species, but it remains unclear if it is a general feature of all eukaryotic cis regulatory elements. To address this, here we define cis regulatory elements in C. elegans, D. melanogaster and H. sapiens and investigate the determinants of their transcription directionality. In all three species, we find that divergent transcription is initiated from two separate core promoter sequences and promoter regions display competition between histone modifications on the + 1 and −1 nucleosomes. In contrast, promoter directionality, sequence composition surrounding promoters, and positional enrichment of chromatin states, are different across species. Integrative models of H3K4me3 levels and core promoter sequence are highly predictive of promoter and enhancer directionality and support two directional classes, skewed and balanced. The relative importance of features to these models are clearly distinct for promoters and enhancers. Differences in regulatory architecture within and between metazoans are therefore abundant, arguing against a unified eukaryotic model.

Cell fate decisions require the deployment of distinct transcriptional programmes—how this is controlled and orchestrated is a key question from basic developmental biology to regenerative medicine. In this issue of The EMBO Journal, Pataskar and Jung et al (Pataskar et al, 2015) demonstrate how the transcription factor NeuroD1 acts genome‐wide to elicit a specific neurogenic programme, including differentiation and migration. Much of that activity is due to NeuroD1 acting as a pioneer factor. NeuroD1 is able to bind its targets within repressive chromatin and can induce a more open chromatin state amenable to cell type‐specific regulation.

Divergent transcription from promoters and enhancers is pervasive in many species, but it remains unclear if it is a general and passive feature of all eukaryotic cis regulatory elements. To address this, we define promoters and enhancers in C. elegans, D. melanogaster and H. sapiens using ATAC-Seq and investigate the determinants of their transcription initiation directionalities by analyzing genome-wide nascent, cap-selected, polymerase run-on assays. All three species initiate divergent transcription from separate core promoter sequences. Sequence asymmetry downstream of forward and reverse initiation sites, known to be important for . CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder. It is made available under aThe copyright holder for this preprint (which was . http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/224642 doi: bioRxiv preprint first posted online termination and stability in H. sapiens, is unique in each species. Chromatin states of divergent promoters are not entirely conserved, but in all three species, the levels of histone modifications on the +1 nucleosome are independent from those on the -1 nucleosome, arguing for independent initiation events. This is supported by an integrative model of H3K4me3 levels and core promoter sequence that is highly predictive of promoter directionality and of two types of promoters: those with balanced initiation directionality and those with skewed directionality. Lastly, D.melanogaster enhancers display variation in chromatin architecture depending on enhancer location, and D. melanogaster promoter regions with dual enhancer/promoter potential are enriched for divergent transcription. Our results point to a high degree of variation in regulatory element transcription initiation directionality within and between metazoans, and to non-passive regulatory mechanisms of transcription initiation directionality in those species.The application of deep sequencing assays led to the unanticipated observation that the promoters of many genes are transcribed in both directions, a phenomenon dubbed divergent transcription. In divergent promoters, transcripts made in the direction antisense to the annotated gene are non-protein-coding and highly unstable such that they can typically only be detected in assays enriching for nascent RNA.Divergent transcription is pervasive across many eukaryotes including yeast, C.elegans, M. musculus and H. sapiens [1][2][3][4][5] , though is highly depleted in D.In mammals, the asymmetric output of divergent promoters was suggested to be the result of a post-transcriptional competition model between the splicing machinery and the cleavage/polyadenylation machinery such that enriched splice site . CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder. It is made available under a The copyright holder for this preprint (which was . http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/224642 doi: bioRxiv preprint first posted online sequences lead to transcript extension and stabilization in the forward direction, whereas ...