The centrosome is the main microtubule-organizing center and constitutes the largest protein complex in a eukaryotic cell. The Dictyostelium centrosome is an established model for acentriolar centrosomes and it consists of a layered core structure surrounded by a so-called corona, which harbors microtubule nucleation complexes. We have identified 34 new centrosomal candidate proteins through mass spectrometrical analysis of the proteome of isolated Dictyostelium centrosomes. Here we present a characterization of 12 centrosomal candidate proteins all featuring coiled coil regions and low expression levels, which are the most common attributes of centrosomal proteins. We used GFP fusion proteins to localize the candidate proteins in whole cells and on microtubule-free, isolated centrosomes. Thus we were able to identify nine new genuine centrosomal proteins including a putative orthologue of Cep192, an interaction partner of polo-like kinase 4 in human centriole biogenesis. In this respect, centrosomal localization of the only polo-like kinase in Dictyostelium, Plk, is also shown in this work. Using confocal deconvolution microscopy, four components, CP39, CP55, CP75, and CP91 could be clearly assigned to the so far almost uncharacterized centrosomal core structure, while CP148 and Cep192 localized to a zone between that of corona marker and core proteins. Finally, CP103 and CP248 were constituents of the corona. In contrast, NE81 was localized at the nuclear envelope and three others, an orthologue of the spindle checkpoint component Mad1, the novel Cenp68, and the centrosomal CP248 were observed at the centromeres, which are clustered and linked to the centrosome throughout the entire cell cycle.

Cell therapy using multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) is of high interest in various indications. As the pleiotropic effects mediated by MSCs rely mostly on their unique secretory profile, long-term persistence of ex-vivo-expanded cells in the recipient may not always be desirable. Irradiation is a routine procedure in transfusion medicine to prevent long-term persistence of nucleated cells and could therefore also be applied to MSCs. We have exposed human bone-marrow-derived MSCs to 30 or 60 Gy of g-irradiation and assessed cell proliferation, clonogenicity, differentiation, cytokine levels in media supernatants, surface receptor profile, as well as expression of proto-oncogenes/cell cycle markers, self-renewal/stemness markers, and DNA damage/ irradiation markers. Irradiated MSCs show a significant decrease in proliferation and colony-forming unitfibroblasts. However, a subpopulation of surviving cells is able to differentiate, but is unable to form colonies after irradiation. Irradiated MSCs showed stable expression of CD73 and CD90 and absence of CD3, CD34, and CD45 during a 16-week follow-up period. We found increased vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels and a decrease of platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-AA and PDGF-AB/BB in culture media of nonirradiated cells. Irradiated MSCs showed an inverse pattern, that is, no increase of VEGF, and less consumption of PDGF-AA and PDGF-AB/BB. Interestingly, interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels increased during culture regardless of irradiation. Cells with lower sensitivity toward g-irradiation showed positive b-galactosidase activity 10 days after irradiation. Gene expression of both irradiated and nonirradiated MSCs 13-16 weeks after irradiation with 60 Gy predominantly followed the same pattern; cell cycle regulators CDKN1A (p21) and CDKN2A (p16) were upregulated, indicating cell cycle arrest, whereas classical proto-oncogenes, respectively, and self-renewal/stemness markers MYC, TP53 (p53), and KLF4 were downregulated. In addition, DNA damage/irradiation markers ATM, ATR, BRCA1, CHEK1, CHEK2, MDC1, and TP53BP1 also mostly showed the same pattern of gene expression as high-dose g-irradiation. In conclusion, we demonstrated the existence of an MSC subpopulation with remarkable resistance to high-dose g-irradiation. Cells surviving irradiation retained their trilineage differentiation capacity and surface marker profile but changed their cytokine secretion profile and became prematurely senescent.

Simple stress or necrotic cell death with subsequent release of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) is a characteristic feature of most advanced tumors. DAMPs within the tumor microenvironment stimulate tumor-associated cells, including dendritic cells and mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs). The presence of tumor-infiltrating MSCs is associated with tumor progression and metastasis. Oxidized necrotic material loses its stimulatory capacity for MSCs. As a DAMP, S100A4 is sensitive to oxidation whereas uric acid (UA) acts primarily as an antioxidant. We tested these two biologic moieties separately and in combination for their activity on MSCs. Similar to necrotic tumor material, S100A4 and UA both dose-dependently induced chemotaxis of MSCs with synergistic effects when combined. Substituting for UA, alternative antioxidants (vitamin C, DTT, and N-acetylcysteine) also enhanced the chemotactic activity of S100A4 in a synergistic manner. This emphasizes the reducing potential of UA being, at least in part, responsible for the observed synergy. With regard to MSC proliferation, both S100A4 and UA inhibited MSCs without altering survival or inducing differentiation toward adipo-, osteo-, or chondrocytes. In the presence of S100A4 or UA, MSCs gained an immunosuppressive capability and stably induced IL-10– and IDO-expressing lymphocytes that maintained their phenotype following proliferation. We have thus demonstrated that both S100A4 and UA act as DAMPs and, as such, may play a critical role in promoting some aspects of MSC-associated immunoregulation. Our findings have implications for therapeutic approaches targeting the tumor microenvironment and addressing the immunosuppressive nature of unscheduled cell death within the tumor microenvironment.

Leukemic stem cells (LSC) might be the source for leukemic disease self-renewal and account for disease relapse after treatment, which makes them a critical target for further therapeutic options. We investigated the role of cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTL) counteracting and recognizing LSC. Leukemia-associated antigens (LAA) represent immunogenic structures to target LSC. We enriched the LSC-containing fraction of 20 AML patients and hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) of healthy volunteers. Using microarray analysis and qRT-PCR we detected high expression of several LAA in AML cells but also in LSC. PRAME (p 5 0.0085), RHAMM (p 5 0.03), WT1 (p 5 0.04) and Proteinase 3 (p 5 0.04) showed significant differential expression in LSC compared with HSC. PRAME, RHAMM and WT1 are furthermore also lower expressed on leukemic bulk. In contrast, Proteinase 3 indicates a higher expression on leukemic bulk than on LSC. In colony forming unit (CFU) immunoassays, T cells stimulated against various LAA indicated a significant inhibition of CFUs in AML patient samples. The LAA PRAME, RHAMM and WT1 showed highest immunogenic responses with a range up to 58-83%. In a proof of principle xenotransplant mouse model, PRAME-stimulated CTL targeted AML stem cells, reflected by a delayed engraftment of leukemia (p 5 0.0159). Taken together, we demonstrated the expression of several LAA in LSC. LAA-specific T cells are able to hamper LSC in immunoassays and in a mouse model, which suggests that immunotherapeutic approaches have the potential to target malignant stem cells.