OBJECTIVE To examine associations of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection/coronavirus disease 2019 with incident diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study using Veterans Health Administration data. We defined all patients without preexisting diabetes with one or more nasal swabs positive for SARS-CoV-2 (1 March 2020–10 March 2021; n = 126,710) as exposed and those with no positive swab and one or more laboratory tests (1 March 2020–31 March 2021; n = 2,651,058) as unexposed. The index date for patients exposed was the date of first positive swab and for patients unexposed a random date during the month of the qualifying laboratory test. We fit sex-stratified logistic regression models examining associations of SARS-CoV-2 with incident diabetes within 120 days and all follow-up time through 1 June 2021. A subgroup analysis was performed among hospitalized subjects only to help equalize laboratory surveillance. RESULTS SARS-CoV-2 was associated with higher risk of incident diabetes, compared with no positive tests, among men (120 days, odds ratio [OR] 2.56 [95%CI 2.32–2.83]; all time, 1.95 [1.80–2.12]) but not women (120 days, 1.21 [0.88–1.68]; all time, 1.04 [0.82–1.31]). Among hospitalized participants, SARS-CoV-2 was associated with higher risk of diabetes at 120 days and at the end of follow-up in men (OR 1.42 [95% CI 1.22–1.65] and 1.32 [1.16–1.50], respectively) but not women (0.72 [0.34–1.52] and 0.80 [0.44–1.45]). Sex ∗ SARS-CoV-2 interaction P values were all <0.1. CONCLUSIONS SARS-CoV-2 is associated with higher risk of incident diabetes in men but not in women even after greater surveillance related to hospitalization is accounted for.

Background Early convalescent plasma transfusion may reduce mortality in patients with non-severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods This study emulates a (hypothetical) target trial using observational data from a cohort of United States Veterans admitted to a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) facility between May 1 and November 17, 2020 with non-severe COVID-19. The intervention was convalescent plasma initiated within 2 days of eligibility. Thirty-day mortality was compared using cumulative incidence curves, risk differences, and hazard ratios estimated from pooled logistic models with inverse probability weighting to adjust for confounding. Results Of 11,269 eligible person-trials contributed by 4,755 patients, 402 trials were assigned to the convalescent plasma group. Forty and 671 deaths occurred within the plasma and non-plasma groups, respectively. The estimated 30-day mortality risk was 6.5% (95% CI: 4.0, 9.7) in the plasma group and 6.2% (95% CI: 5.6, 7.0) in the non-plasma group. The associated risk difference was 0.30% (95% CI -2.30, 3.60) and the hazard ratio was 1.04 (95% CI 0.64,1.62). Conclusion Our target trial emulation estimated no meaningful differences in 30-day mortality between non-severe COVID-19 patients treated and untreated with convalescent plasma.

No abstract

To identify preinfection risk factors for adverse outcomes among veterans with diabetes and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSWe identified all Veterans Health Administration patients with diabetes and one or more positive nasal swab(s) for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (1 March 2020-10 March 2021) (n = 64,892). We examined associations of HbA 1c and glucose-lowering medication use with hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and mortality at 30 days using logistic regression models and during 4.4 months of follow-up (range <1-13.1) using proportional hazards models. RESULTSCompared with HbA 1c <7.0%, HbA 1c ‡9.0% was associated with higher odds of hospitalization, ICU admission, and death at 30 days (odds ratio [

Background: Patient-reported outcomes are increasingly used as measures of effectiveness of interventions. To make the tools more useful, therapeutic thresholds known as minimally important differences have been developed. The objective of this study was to calculate minimally important differences for the domains of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score for hallux valgus surgery. Methods: The study was based on a retrospective analysis of patients newly scheduled for bunion correction surgery and completing patient-reported outcomes between October 2013 and January 2018. This study used anchor- and distribution-based approaches to calculate the minimally important difference for the instrument’s 5 domains. Confidence intervals were calculated for each approach. There were 91 participants included in the study. Results: Using anchor- and distribution-based approaches, the minimally important difference for the pain domain ranged from 5.8 to 10.2, from 0.3 to 6.9 for the symptoms domain, 8.3 to 10.3 for the activities of daily living domain, 7.4 to 11.1 for the quality of life domain, and from 7.0 to 15.7 for the sports and recreation domain. Small differences in the activities of daily living domain may be more clinically important for patients with better function. Discussion: The range of minimally important difference values for each domain indicate how the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score corresponded to bunion correction surgery. The sports and recreation domain showed considerable variability in the range of values and may be associated with the domain’s lack of responsiveness. Overall, most minimally important difference values for the domains of FAOS ranged from above 4 to below 16. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative series.