To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of escalating doses of interferon-alpha-2b (IFN, Intron A) with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin (DDP) in patients with advanced cancer, 15 patients were accrued between May 1990 and July 1991. Primary sites were unknown (3), colorectal (3), head and neck (2), lung (2), gynecologic (1), gallbladder (1), sarcoma (1), anal canal (1) and pancreas (1). IFN was given s.c. on days 1-5 and then three times weekly with DDP (75 mg/m2, day 1) and 5-FU [750 mg/m2, days 1-5, continuous infusion (CI) on a 28-day cycle. The first two patients treated at level I (3 x 10(6) U/m2 s.c.) experienced possible neurotoxic deaths [massive cerebrovascular accident (CVA) and metabolic encephalopathy], and patient 3 had a grade 4 toxicity of performance status decline. Analysis of these events led us to exclude the enrollment of patients on i.v. morphine and of those with prior exposure to DDP. This resulted in grade 3 toxicity in terms of nausea, vomiting, fatigue and leukopenia but in no further CNS event. All patients were evaluable for toxicity but only ten were evaluable for response. Only two partial responses were seen, one in a patient with an unknown primary tumour and one in a patient with head and neck cancer. The combination of IFN is possible with 5-FU and DDP. The recommended dose of IFN is 2 x 10(6) U/m2 s.c. in patients with no prior exposure to DDP or i.v. morphine, given together with 5-FU (750 mg/m2, days 1-5, CI) and DDP (75 mg/m2, day 1) on a 28-day cycle.
BACKGROUND AR-67 (formerly DB-67) is a novel 3rd generation camptothecin with improved safety and lipophilicity than current drugs in this class. Safety and efficacy of AR-67 were evaluated in a Phase 2 study in recurrent GBM/gliosarcoma in adult patients. METHODS AR-67 (7.5 mg/m2) was administered once daily by IV infusion for 5 consecutive days on a 21-day cycle. Cohort 1 patients (N=31/46 enrolled) had not received (or had not recently failed) bevacizumab. Cohort 2 patients (N=13/46 enrolled) had failed bevacizumab within 90 days before screening. Cohort assignments for 2/46 patients were undetermined. Tumor response was assessed ≥14d after every second cycle and before every third cycle using MRI. Primary endpoints were 6-month PFS (Cohort 1), and 2-month PFS (Cohort 2). RESULTS 45/46 patients received ≥ one dose of AR-67; one patient (Cohort 1) died prior to dosing. Efficacy: 6/30 (Cohort 1) and 2/13 (Cohort 2) treated patients achieved the primary endpoints of 6- and 2-month PFS, respectively. Across the study, PR was the best overall response in 3/45 treated patients, all in Cohort 1. SD was the best overall disease response in 7/45 treated patients (5 in Cohort 1 and 2 in Cohort2). Safety: AR-67 was well tolerated; 17 patients (38%) exhibited serious adverse events (SAEs) including headache and Grade 4/5 muscular weakness (2.2%). Most TEAEs were mild/moderate in intensity and Grade 1–3 intoxicity. Notably absent was Grade 4 diarrhea, a hallmark of other approved camptothecin chemotherapies. CONCLUSIONS AR-67 was well tolerated and exhibited a safety profile consistent with or better than currently approved camptothecins. 6/30 treated patients in Cohort 1 and 2/13 patients in Cohort 2 achieved the primary endpoints of 6- and 2-month PFS, respectively. PR was the best overall response in 3/45 treated patients and SD was the best overall response in 7/45 patients.
Introduction: Onapristone is an antiprogestin with demonstrated clinical activity in breast cancer, reported to have a t1/2 between 2 and 4 hours. Drugs such as megestrol acetate and abiraterone generally show variability in absorption and, depending on the formulation, food effect (≥10 x Cmax variation; ≥5 x AUC variation). A study was conducted to determine the best formulation of onapristone to minimize this variability. Methods: The aim of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetic profile of onapristone and mono-desmethyl onapristone (M1), with and without food. Using a two-period, two-sequence, random assignment cross-over design, twelve healthy female subjects were given 10 mg of an oral immediate release formulation of onapristone either after an overnight fast, or within 30 minutes after a high-fat high-calorie meal, with a 2 week washout between dosing periods. PK sampling was performed following each oral administration at: 0, 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours (h). Parameters were calculated using the linear trapezoidal method. Population PK modeling was conducted using the nonlinear mixed effect model. Results: Onapristone plasma t1/2 (mean ± SD) was 4.36 ±0.81 h for the fasted and 3.76 ±0.36 h for the fed state. The absorption phase appeared linear. Onapristone tmax was delayed from 1 to 4 h after food intake. A small effect on the single dose onapristone pharmacokinetic profile was also observed, with a slightly decreased mean Cmax (18%) and increased AUC0-last (11%). Mean population CL of onapristone was 5.02 ±0.67 L/h and 6.63 ±0.87 L/h for fasted and fed states respectively. There was no food effect on M1 exposure but a decrease in M1 plasma peaks (∼35%) after food intake. The onapristone time-concentration curve was adequately described by a 2-compartment open model with linear elimination using a population PK approach. A significant food effect (p<0.0001) was observed on CL of onapristone but not M1. Modeling confirmed that food increased onapristone AUC. One subject aged 27 experienced a 23-day delay in menses after one 10mg onapristone dose and 1 subject experienced transient G2 liver enzyme elevation 3 weeks post-dose. Conclusion: Clinically meaningful Cmax can be reached with a 10 mg onapristone dose. The results are consistent with prior observations, indicating that food delayed absorption and increased AUC when taken concomitantly. Food effect is minimal compared to other drugs in class, but onapristone should preferably be administered 2 hours before or 1 hour after meals. This food effect is unlikely to have clinical consequences. As absorption is linear, a sustained release formulation would probably reduce Cmax by ∼25% while not substantially modifying AUC. Given the estimated t1/2 of 2-4 hours, adequate concentrations should be maintained with twice a day dosing. Citation Format: Keyvan Rezai, Stefan Proniuk, Alex Zukiwski, Erard Gilles, Didier Chassard, Caroline Denot, Haydee L. Ramos, Alice S. Bexon, François Lokiec. Pharmacokinetic (PK) food effect study of immediate-release onapristone and its primary metabolite (M1) in healthy female subjects: implications for design of a new formulation. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 4636. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-4636
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.