The use of deformation capacity limits is becoming increasingly common in seismic design and assessment of reinforced concrete (RC) walls. Deformation capacity limits for RC walls in existing design and assessment documents are reviewed using a comprehensive database. It is found that the existing models are inconsistent and do not account for variation in deformation capacity with changes in the ratio of neutral axis depth to wall length ( c/ L w) and ratio of transverse reinforcement spacing to longitudinal bar diameter ( s/ d b) at the wall end region. A new mechanics-based model considering strain limits on the concrete and reinforcement is recommended. Concrete compressive strain limits for different levels of wall end region detailing are selected based on curvature ductilities for the walls in the database. Reinforcement tensile strain is limited based on a model for bar buckling. The proposed model, which accounts for c/ L w and s/ d b, is shown to have less dispersion and more accuracy than existing models when compared against experimental data and provides consistency between assessment and design provisions.
A wide range of reinforced concrete (RC) wall performance was observed following the 2010/2011 Canterbury earthquakes, with most walls performing as expected, but some exhibiting undesirable and unexpected damage and failure characteristics. A comprehensive research programme, funded by the Building Performance Branch of the New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, and involving both numerical and experimental studies, was developed to investigate the unexpected damage observed in the earthquakes and provide recommendations for the design and assessment procedures for RC walls. In particular, the studies focused on the performance of lightly reinforced walls; precast walls and connections; ductile walls; walls subjected to bi-directional loading; and walls prone to out-of-plane instability. This paper summarises each research programme and provides practical recommendations for the design and assessment of RC walls based on key findings, including recommended changes to NZS 3101 and the NZ Seismic Assessment Guidelines.
To investigate an evaluation method of collapse mechanisms and the safety limit of RC buildings, a shake-table test of a 1/4 scale model of a 4story RC structure with shear walls was carried out. The specimen was designed to exhibit a frame-sway mechanism in both directions. In the test, the first-floor wall failed in flexure in the X-direction as designed; however, the first-floor wall in the Y-direction failed in shear, which did not match the design. Moreover, collapse mechanism and safety limit of the whole frame was discussed comparing the analytical result with the test result.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.