Motor units with small territories and varying fiber orientations may be an anatomical predisposition to regulate how regions within VM apply forces to the patella. This could help to redistribute loads within the joint in painful conditions.

No abstract

Movement is changed in pain, but the mechanisms remain unclear. Key questions are unresolved such as whether activation can be inhomogeneously distributed within a muscle in a manner that is specific to the location of noxious input. This study addressed this question using high-density electromyography (EMG) to study regional redistribution of muscle activation within the vasti muscles and changes in knee extension force direction in response to noxious stimulation applied to muscular and nonmuscular tissues around the knee. Fourteen participants performed a low-force knee extension contraction at baseline, during, and after pain induced in 4 locations (infrapatellar fat pad, vastus lateralis, distal vastus medialis, or proximal vastus medialis). The knee extension force direction was estimated from a 3-dimensional load cell positioned just above the ankle. Regional muscle activation was estimated from amplitude of high-density surface EMG signals from vastus medialis and lateralis. Pain-induced spatial variations of activation were identified as the position of the 5 channels that showed the largest decrease (or smallest increase) in amplitude from baseline to pain or after pain. Knee extension force was produced more medially during pain after infrapatellar pad injection only (P = 0.01). Preferential reduction of activation of the distal region of vastus medialis was observed when distal vastus medialis (P < 0.001) or vastus lateralis (P < 0.05) was injected. Both adaptations persisted after pain resolution. These results support the hypothesis that specific adaptation depends on the location of a noxious stimulus and imply that recovery of pain is not necessarily concomitant with return of the EMG to prepain patterns.

In this study we investigated whether the spatial distribution of surface electromyographic (EMG) amplitude can be used to describe the activation of muscle portions with different biomechanical actions. Ten healthy subjects performed isometric contractions aimed to selectively activate a number of forearm muscles or muscle subportions. Monopolar electromyographic signals were collected with an electrode grid of 128 electrodes placed on the proximal, dorsal portion of the forearm. The monopolar EMG amplitude [root mean square (RMS) value] distribution was calculated for each contraction, and high-amplitude channels were identified through an automatic procedure; the position of the EMG source was estimated with the barycenter of these channels. Each of the contractions tested was associated to a specific EMG amplitude distribution, whose location in space was consistent with the expected anatomical position of the main agonist muscle (or subportion). The position of each source was significantly different from the others in at least one direction (ANOVA; transversally to the forearm: P < 0.01, F = 125.92; longitudinally: P < 0.01, F = 35.83). With such an approach, we could distinguish the spatial position of EMG distributions related to the activation of contiguous muscles [e.g., extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) and extensor digitorum communis (EDC)], different heads of the same muscle (i.e., extensor carpi radialis (ECR) brevis and longus) and different functional compartments (i.e., EDC, middle, and ring fingers). These findings are discussed in terms of how forces along a given direction can be produced by recruiting population of motor units clustered not only in specific muscles, but also in muscle sub-portions. In addition, this study supports the use of high-density EMG systems to characterize the activation of muscle subportions with different biomechanical actions.