Neurons of the mammalian CNS are thought to originate from progenitors dividing at the apical surface of the neuroepithelium. Here we use mouse embryos expressing GFP from the Tis21 locus, a gene expressed throughout the neural tube in most, if not all, neuron-generating progenitors, to specifically reveal the cell divisions that produce CNS neurons. In addition to the apical, asymmetric divisions of neuroepithelial (NE) cells that generate another NE cell and a neuron, we find, from the onset of neurogenesis, a second population of progenitors that divide in the basal region of the neuroepithelium and generate two neurons. Basal progenitors are most frequent in the telencephalon, where they outnumber the apically dividing neuron-generating NE cells. Our observations reconcile previous data on the origin and lineage of CNS neurons and show that basal, rather than apical, progenitors are the major source of the neurons of the mammalian neocortex.A ll neurons generated during the development of the mammalian CNS derive from neuroepithelial (NE) cells (see Supporting Text, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site). NE cells undergo three principal kinds of cell division, (i) symmetric, proliferative divisions (two NE cells) (see Supporting Text for terminology), (ii) asymmetric divisions (one NE cell, one neuron) and (iii) symmetric, differentiating divisions (two neurons) (1-6). It remains to be settled whether, at the very onset of neurogenesis, NE cells switch only to asymmetric division, or to both asymmetric and symmetric differentiating divisions.Real-time imaging studies of cells dividing at the apical surface of the neuroepithelium (7-9) and analyses of intrinsic cell fate determinants with a polarized distribution in mitotic NE cells (7, 10, 11) have provided evidence in support of the widely held view that during early neurogenesis, neurons are generated from NE cells by asymmetric rather than symmetric differentiating divisions (2,6,(12)(13)(14). In contrast, consistent with retroviral lineage tracing studies in vivo (5,(15)(16)(17)(18), analysis of the division patterns of isolated NE cells and their progeny has documented the coexistence, in vitro, of asymmetric and symmetric neurongenerating divisions of progenitors at the onset of neurogenesis (19-21). One possible explanation for this apparent discrepancy is the existence of neuronal progenitors other than the canonical NE cell dividing at the apical surface of the neuroepithelium.One of the problems in studying the divisions of NE cells that generate neurons has been the lack of a marker that allows one to distinguish between proliferating and neuron-generating NE cells and to identify the latter before they enter mitosis. Our group previously reported the first such marker, Tis21, an antiproliferative gene that within the neural tube is selectively expressed in neuron-generating, but not proliferating, NE cells, nor in neurons (22). Moreover, given that Ͼ95% of the newborn CNS neurons appear to inherit TIS21 protein from t...

Stem cell persistence into adulthood requires self-renewal from early developmental stages. In the developing mouse brain, only apical progenitors located at the ventricle are self-renewing, whereas basal progenitors gradually deplete. However, nothing is known about the mechanisms regulating the fundamental difference between these progenitors. Here we show that the conditional deletion of the small Rho-GTPase cdc42 at different stages of neurogenesis in mouse telencephalon results in an immediate increase in basal mitoses. Whereas cdc42-deficient progenitors have normal cell cycle length, orientation of cell division and basement membrane contact, the apical location of the Par complex and adherens junctions are gradually lost, leading to an increasing failure of apically directed interkinetic nuclear migration. These cells then undergo mitoses at basal positions and acquire the fate of basal progenitors. Thus, cdc42 has a crucial role at the apical pole of progenitors, thereby regulating the position of mitoses and cell fate.

The developing cerebral cortex contains apical and basal types of neurogenic progenitor cells. Here, we investigated the cellular properties and neurogenic output of basal progenitors, also called intermediate neuronal progenitors (INPs). We found that basal mitoses expressing transcription factor Tbr2 (an INP marker) were present throughout corticogenesis, from embryonic day 10.5 through birth. Postnatally, Tbr2(+) progenitors were present in the dentate gyrus, subventricular zone (SVZ), and posterior periventricle (pPV). Two morphological subtypes of INPs were distinguished in the embryonic cortex, "short radial" in the ventricular zone (VZ) and multipolar in the SVZ, probably corresponding to molecularly defined INP subtypes. Unexpectedly, many short radial INPs appeared to contact the apical (ventricular) surface and some divided there. Time-lapse video microscopy suggested that apical INP divisions produced daughter INPs. Analysis of neurogenic divisions (Tis21-green fluorescent protein [GFP](+)) indicated that INPs may produce the majority of projection neurons for preplate, deep, and superficial layers. Conversely, proliferative INP divisions (Tis21-GFP(-)) increased from early to middle corticogenesis, concomitant with SVZ growth. Our findings support the hypothesis that regulated amplification of INPs may be an important factor controlling the balance of neurogenesis among different cortical layers.

Mammalian hippocampus is crucial for episodic memory formation1 and transiently retains information for ~3–4 weeks in adult mice and longer in humans2. Although neuroscientists widely believe neural synapses are elemental sites of information storage3, there has been no direct evidence hippocampal synapses persist for time intervals commensurate with the duration of hippocampal-dependent memory. Here we tested the prediction that the lifetimes of hippocampal synapses match the longevity of hippocampal memory. By using time-lapse two-photon microendoscopy4 in the CA1 hippocampal area of live mice, we monitored the turnover dynamics of pyramidal neurons’ basal dendritic spines, post-synaptic structures whose turnover dynamics are thought to reflect those of excitatory synaptic connections5,6. Strikingly, CA1 spine turnover dynamics differed sharply from that seen previously in neocortex7–9. Mathematical modeling revealed that the data best matched kinetic models with a single population of spines of mean lifetime ~1–2 weeks. This implies ~100% turnover in ~2–3 times this interval, a near full erasure of the synaptic connectivity pattern. Although NMDA receptor blockade stabilizes spines in neocortex10,11, in CA1 it transiently increased the rate of spine loss and thus lowered spine density. These results reveal that adult neocortical and hippocampal pyramidal neurons have divergent patterns of spine regulation and quantitatively support the idea that the transience of hippocampal-dependent memory directly reflects the turnover dynamics of hippocampal synapses.