<p>Rainfall-induced shallow landslides, which mobilize the first few meters of soil cover (usually <2m) following significant rainfall events, can severely impact human life. They most frequently damage human activities as they often dam rivers, invade roads, destroy crops and occasionally cause the loss of human lives.</p> <p>Such landslides can develop in vineyards, as they are commonly grown on hillslopes, causing farmers to lose revenue. However, not all vineyards are managed the same way: standard management techniques include (1) Tillage and Total Tillage (T/TT), which is the tillage of the soil between rows up to 6 times a year; (2) Permanent Grass Cover (PGC), in which grass is allowed to grow between rows and (3) ALTernating tillage-grass (ALT), the practice of tilling every other row.</p> <p>Since land use has been proven to impact landslide susceptibility, the present work aims to investigate how landslide susceptibility would be affected by vineyard management changes.</p> <p>To do so, a probabilistic version of the physically based landscape evolution model Lapsus-LS was adopted.</p> <p>Created as a physically based model, LAPSUS simulates soil movement downslope by calculating the critical rainfall needed for triggering landsliding. After calibrating the critical rainfall threshold, the model calculates a slide trajectory and accumulation lobe with a double multiple flow routine.</p> <p>The model requires as inputs the Digital Terrain Model (DTM) of the area, range values for geotechnical parameters, and a land use map of the site. Associated with the latter are values of root cohesion, which vary among different vineyard management practices: root cohesion is lower in T and TT vineyards and is higher in PGC and ALT vineyards.</p> <p>In its probabilistic version, the model selects each input from a range of acceptable values and runs its course 100 times to compile a map illustrating which cells are more commonly predicted as unstable. Cells calculated as unstable in more than 50% of the iterations are classified as such.</p> <p>The model was applied in the basin of Rio Vergomberra (municipality of Canneto Pavese, PV), a hilly area of 0.54 km<sup>2</sup>, in the Oltrep&#242; Pavese (located in the southern-west sector of the region of Lombardy, in Italy) where shallow landslides triggered by rainfall are expected. Vineyards in the area are managed through T and TT techniques in the southeast sector, where most of the landslides have occurred, and through PGC and ALT in the northwest sector, where no landslides have occurred.</p> <p>It was therefore evaluated how the predicted landslide susceptibility would be affected if vineyards currently cultivated with T and TT management techniques were to be managed through PGC.</p> <p>The result was a lowering of the predicted susceptibility in previously unstable T and TT vineyards, despite the steep slope angles.</p> <p>The result is also supported by the generally lower number of landslides in PGC vineyards compared to T and TT vineyards in the Oltrep&#242; Pavese. In the presented study area alone, all five past landslides that occurred in vineyards were located in tilled vineyards.&#160;</p>
<p>According to the Centre for Research on Epidemiology of Disasters, every year landslides are to be blamed worldwide for at least 17% of all fatalities from natural disasters. Rainfall-induced shallow landslides are responsible for a significant number of those: they mobilize the first few meters (usually <2m) of soil, have high velocities and occur after abundant and prolonged rainfall events.</p><p>The runout of a landslide, defined as the difference between the total area of a landslide and its source area, from which the sediment is first mobilized, is what determines how far a landslide travels and how big the affected area is, and yet the runout is often neglected when it comes to analysing the overall hazard caused by potential landslides.</p><p>The land use practices have been proven as one of the factors which impact the susceptibility of an area to the formation of shallow landslides, it is however less clear if the land use also plays a role in influencing the size of the area of runout.</p><p>The aim of the present work is to investigate the correlation between the runout area and the land use in which the shallow landslide develops.</p><p>To do so, two inventories of landslides, which occurred in neighbouring regions in Northern Italy (Lombardy and Piedmont), comparable for lithology, land use, geomorphology and climate, were analysed.</p><p>The result of the analysis was that there were statistical differences in the distribution of the runout among different land use classes, meaning that an influence of the land use on the runout was highly probable. Such results could improve the comprehension on shallow landslides mobility and runout and could lead to the development of possible models of assessment of the runout at different scales.</p>
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.