The present findings generate the hypothesis of a possible role for the use of stereotactic body radiotherapy in selected patients with distant node metastases from oligometastatic urothelial carcinoma.

500 Background: Benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) in addition to endocrine therapy (ET) remains controversial for patients (pts) aged ≥ 70 years with oestrogen receptors-positive (ER+) HER2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC). In a large prospective trial, we first assessed the tumour genomic grade index (GGI) in all pts, and second, randomized pts with a high GGI between CT + ET vs. ET alone. Methods: Eligible pts were women ≥ 70 years with ER+ HER2- primary BC or isolated local relapse, irrespective of other characteristics, for whom adjuvant systemic treatment was considered. G8 score, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and 4-year mortality Lee score were collected at baseline. GGI was centrally performed by RT-PCR on FFPE samples. Pts with low GGI were not recommended to receive CT and were followed in an observational cohort. Pts with high (+ equivocal) GGI were randomized 1:1 to CT + ET vs. ET alone, using G8, pN and centre for stratification. Investigators chose between 3 CT regimens: 4 cycles of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide, non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide or docetaxel/cyclophosphamide, given q3w with G-CSF. Standard ET consisted of 5 years of aromatase inhibitor, tamoxifen or a sequence based on tolerance. Based on CALGB 49907 results, the primary objective was to demonstrate an overall survival (OS) benefit for CT (4-year assumptions 87.5 vs 80%, HR=0.60) in the intent to treat (ITT) population. With 171 events, the trial had 90% power to demonstrate a difference with a bilateral test α=0.05. Secondary objectives included BC specific survival (BCSS), invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), event-free survival (EFS), competing events, cost-effectiveness and Q-TWiST analysis, geriatric dimensions, willingness and quality of life. Results: Between 04/2012 and 05/2016, 1,969 pts from 61 French and 12 Belgian centres were enrolled. Of them, 1,089 (55%) were randomized between CT + ET and ET alone. Median follow-up was 5.8 years at the data cut-off (17/12/2021) with 180 OS events observed. Median age was 75 (70-92), G8 score, CCI and Lee score being >14, ≤ 2, and ≤ 8 in 60%, 62% and 84% of pts, respectively. Tumours were ≥ pT2, pN+, isolated local relapses, with histological grade III, in 56%, 46%, 11% and 39% of cases, respectively. No significant OS difference was observed between arms (HR 0.85 [0.64-1.13], p=0.2538); 4-year OS was 90.5% in the CT + ET arm and 89.7% in the ET alone arm. The forest plot could not identify any subgroup deriving significant benefit from CT. ITT and per protocol analysis of secondary objectives (BCSS, iDFS, EFS) showed similar results. Conclusions: In this large phase III trial, we did not find a statistically significant OS benefit with the addition of CT to ET after surgery for ER+ HER2- BC with a high GGI. Analysis of the other outcome measures will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT0156405.

No abstract

No abstract

Background: Cancer patients are at higher risk of COVID-19 complications and mortality than the rest of the population. Breast cancer patients seem to have better prognosis when infected by SARS-CoV-2 than other cancer patients. Methods: We report a subanalysis of the OnCovid study providing more detailed information in the breast cancer population. Results: We included 495 breast cancer patients with a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Mean age was 62.6 years; 31.5% presented more than one comorbidity. The most frequent breast cancer subtype was luminal-like ( n = 245, 49.5%) and 177 (35.8%) had metastatic disease. A total of 332 (67.1%) patients were receiving active treatment, with radical intent in 232 (47.6%) of them. Hospitalization rate was 58.2% and all-cause mortality rate was 20.3%. One hundred twenty-nine (26.1%) patients developed one COVID-19 complication, being acute respiratory failure the most common ( n = 74, 15.0%). In the multivariable analysis, age older than 70 years, presence of COVID-19 complications, and metastatic disease were factors correlated with worse outcomes, while ongoing anticancer therapy at time of COVID-19 diagnosis appeared to be a protective factor. No particular oncological treatment was related to higher risk of complications. In the context of SARS-CoV-2 infection, 73 (18.3%) patients had some kind of modification on their oncologic treatment. At the first oncological reassessment (median time: 46.9 days ± 36.7), 255 (51.6%) patients reported to be fully recovered from the infection. There were 39 patients (7.9%) with long-term SARS-CoV-2-related complications. Conclusion: In the context of COVID-19, our data confirm that breast cancer patients appear to have lower complications and mortality rate than expected in other cancer populations. Most breast cancer patients can be safely treated for their neoplasm during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Oncological treatment has no impact on the risk of SARS-CoV-2 complications, and, especially in the curative setting, the treatment should be modified as little as possible.