No abstract

BackgroundGuidelines for the management of fever in children have been recently published, however “fever phobia” is still spreading. To provide information which may sustain educational interventions tailored to our population we investigated the parental and medical knowledge and management of fever in preschool children.MethodsA questionnaire was administered to a convenient sample of Italian parents and paediatricians. The questionnaire elicited information about definition and cause of fever, concerns about fever, method of temperature measurement, and treatment modalities.ResultsOverall, 388 parents and 480 paediatricians were interviewed. All the parents believed that fever could cause at least one harmful effect and 89.9% (n = 349) believed that, if left untreated, it can cause brain damage or seizures. Parents used multiple resources to obtain information about fever but 67.8% (n = 264) considered paediatricians as their primary resource. Several wrong behaviours were found in the same proportions among parents and paediatricians: 78.5% of paediatricians (n = 377) and 77.8% of parents (n = 302) used physical method to reduce fever (P = 0.867); 27.0% of paediatricians (n = 103) and 21.4% (n = 83) of parents declared to alternate ibuprofen and acetaminophen (P = 0.953). Differently, 73.1% (n = 351) of paediatricians preferred oral to rectal administration of antipyretics compared to 48.7% (n = 190) of parents (P < 0.0001). Worrisomely, 1.4% of paediatricians and 1.2% of parents declared to use acetylsalicylic acid or steroids as second-choice antipyretics (P = 0.937) and 6.7% (n = 26) of parents declared to use table- or teaspoons for determining the dose of drug.ConclusionsPaediatricians’ attitudes greatly influence the parental behaviours and beliefs. Implementation of educational programs regarding the management of the febrile child are needed in our setting.

To provide epidemiological data on community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and complicated CAP, a retrospective study was conducted on a partially vaccinated paediatric population. Data from children hospitalized for CAP in Tuscan hospitals between January 1st, 1999 and December 31st, 2009 were analysed. A total of 5,450 children with CAP were hospitalized. Annual hospitalization rates for CAP did not change significantly over the study period (X2 for trend= 0.652; p=0.419). The total annual hospitalization rate for pneumococcal CAP varied according to age (28.04 per 100,000 children aged less than 5 years, 10.06 per 100,000 children aged 6-12 years and 0.98 per 100,000 children aged greater than13years). Hospitalization rates for pneumococcal CAP increased from12.84 (95 percent CI:7.35-18.34) in 2001 to 45.4 (95 percent CI:35.93-54.90) per 100,000 children aged less than 5 years in 2009 (p less than 0.0001). In addition, a significant increase of hospitalization rates for complicated CAP (from 6.07 in 1999 to 13.66 in 2009 per 100,000 children; P less than 0.0001) and pneumococcal complicated CAP (from 0.19 in 1999 to 3.41 in 2009 per 100,000 children) over the study period were highlighted. Our epidemiological data confirm the decision to introduce the PCV13 vaccine, to satisfy the need to prevent a wider group of pneumococcal serotypes.

No abstract