No abstract

Recently we screened a combinatorial library of R(1)-(Ser/Thr)-Xaa-His-Zaa-R(2) peptides (Xaa = 17 common alpha-amino acids, except Asp, Glu, and Cys; Zaa =19 common alpha-amino acids, except Cys; R(1) = CH(3)CO-Gly-Ala, R(2) = Lys-Phe-Leu-NH(2)) and established criteria for selecting Ser/Thr, Xaa, and Zaa substitutions optimal for specific R(1)-Ser/Thr peptide bond hydrolysis in the presence of Ni(II) ions (Krezel, A.; Kopera, E.; Protas, A. M.; Poznanski, J.; Wysłouch-Cieszynska, A.; Bal, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 3355-3366). The screening results were confirmed by kinetic studies of hydrolysis of seven peptides: R(1)-Ser-Arg-His-Trp-R(2), R(1)-Ser-Lys-His-Trp-R(2), R(1)-Ser-Ala-His-Trp-R(2), R(1)-Ser-Arg-His-Ala-R(2), R(1)-Ser-Gly-His-Ala-R(2), R(1)-Thr-Arg-His-Trp-R(2), and R(1)-Thr-His-His-Trp-R(2). In this paper, we used the same seven peptides to investigate the molecular mechanism of the hydrolysis reaction. We studied temperature dependence of the reaction rate at temperatures between 24 and 75 degrees C, measured stability constants of Ni(II) complexes with hydrolysis substrates and products, and studied the course of R(1)-Ser-Arg-His-Trp-R(2) peptide hydrolysis under a broad range of conditions. We established that the specific square planar complex containing the Ni(II) ion bonded to the His imidazole nitrogen and three preceding peptide bond nitrogens (4N complex) is required for the reaction to occur. The reaction mechanism includes the N-O acyl shift, yielding an intermediate ester of R(1) with the Ser/Thr hydroxyl group. This ester hydrolyzes spontaneously, yielding final products. The Ni(II) ion activates the R(1)-Ser peptide bond by destabilizing it directly through peptide nitrogen coordination and, indirectly, by imposing a strain in the peptide chain.

Phosphorylation of the eukaryotic initiation factor eIF4E in response to mitogenic stimuli and cytokines is implicated in the regulation of the initiation step of translation. It still remains unclear how the phosphorylation of eIF4E regulates the translation. To address this problem, we applied a unique technique in protein engineering, intein-mediated protein ligation, to synthesize eIF4E, which is selectively phosphorylated at Ser 209. Using selectively chosen synthetic cap analogs, we compared quantitatively the cap affinity for phosphorylated and unphosphorylated eIF4E by a fluorometric time-synchronized titration method. A 1.5-to 4.5-fold reduction of the cap affinity for phosphorylated eIF4E was observed, depending on the negative charge of the 5-to-5 phosphate chains as well as the presence of a longer tetraribonucleotide strand. Possible implications for understanding the regulation of eIF4E functioning, cap complex formation, and stability, are discussed.

In most instances, translation is regulated at the initiation phase, when a ribosome is recruited to the 5′ end of an mRNA. The eIF4E-binding proteins (4E-BPs) interdict translation initiation by binding to the translation factor eIF4E, and preventing recruitment of the translation machinery to mRNA. The 4E-BPs inhibit translation in a reversible manner. Hypophosphorylated 4E-BPs interact avidly with eIF4E, whereas 4E-BP hyperphosphorylation, elicited by stimulation of cells with hormones, cytokines, or growth factors, results in an abrogation of eIF4E-binding activity. We reported previously that phosphorylation of 4E-BP1 on Thr 37 and Thr 46 is relatively insensitive to serum deprivation and rapamycin treatment, and that phosphorylation of these residues is required for the subsequent phosphorylation of a set of unidentified serum-responsive sites. Here, using mass spectrometry, we identify the serum-responsive, rapamycin-sensitive sites as Ser 65 and Thr 70. Utilizing a novel combination of two-dimensional isoelectric focusing/SDS-PAGE and Western blotting with phosphospecific antibodies, we also establish the order of 4E-BP1 phosphorylation in vivo; phosphorylation of Thr 37/Thr 46 is followed by Thr 70 phosphorylation, and Ser 65 is phosphorylated last. Finally, we show that phosphorylation of Ser 65 and Thr 70 alone is insufficient to block binding to eIF4E, indicating that a combination of phosphorylation events is necessary to dissociate 4E-BP1 from eIF4E.

Several studies focusing on elucidating the mechanism of NO (nitric oxide) signalling in plant cells have highlighted that its biological effects are partly mediated by protein kinases. The identity of these kinases and details of how NO modulates their activities, however, remain poorly investigated. In the present study, we have attempted to clarify the mechanisms underlying NO action in the regulation of NtOSAK (Nicotiana tabacum osmotic stress-activated protein kinase), a member of the SNF1 (sucrose non-fermenting 1)-related protein kinase 2 family. We found that in tobacco BY-2 (bright-yellow 2) cells exposed to salt stress, NtOSAK is rapidly activated, partly through a NO-dependent process. This activation, as well as the one observed following treatment of BY-2 cells with the NO donor DEA/NO (diethylamine-NONOate), involved the phosphorylation of two residues located in the kinase activation loop, one being identified as Ser158. Our results indicate that NtOSAK does not undergo the direct chemical modifications of its cysteine residues by S-nitrosylation. Using a co-immunoprecipitation-based strategy, we identified several proteins present in immunocomplex with NtOSAK in salt-treated cells including the glycolytic enzyme GAPDH (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase). Our results indicate that NtOSAK directly interacts with GAPDH in planta. Furthermore, in response to salt, GAPDH showed a transient increase in its S-nitrosylation level which was correlated with the time course of NtOSAK activation. However, GADPH S-nitrosylation did not influence its interaction with NtOSAK and did not have an impact on the activity of the protein kinase. Taken together, the results support the hypothesis that NtOSAK and GAPDH form a cellular complex and that both proteins are regulated directly or indirectly by NO.