(1) Background: A retrospective clinical study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of different pharmacological and non-pharmacological regimens for treating sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL). (2) Methods: Adult patients (n = 130) diagnosed with sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) and hospitalized between 2015 and 2020 were enrolled in this study. Depending on the treatment regimen applied, patients were divided into five groups. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (i) hearing loss of sudden onset; (ii) hearing loss of at least 30 dB at three consecutive frequencies; (iii) unilateral hearing loss; (iv) age above 18 years. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (i) no follow-up audiogram; (ii) bilateral hearing loss; (iii) recognized alternative diagnosis such as tumor, disorder of inner ear fluids, infection or inflammation, autoimmune disease, malformation, hematological disease, dialysis-dependent renal failure, postdural puncture syndrome, gene-related syndrome, mitochondrial disease; and (iv) age below 18 years. (3) Results: Complete recovery was found in 14% of patients (18/130) and marked improvement was found in 6% (8/130), giving an overall success rate of 20%. The best results were obtained in the second group (i.e., patients given intratympanic glucocorticoid + prolonged orally administered glucocorticoid) where the success rate was 28%. In general, the older the patient, the smaller the improvement in hearing, a correlation that was statistically significant. (4) Conclusions: In treating SSNHL, the highest rate of hearing recovery—28%—was in the group of patients given intratympanic corticoid plus prolonged treatment with orally administered glucocorticoid.

Background: A prospective clinical study was conducted to investigate whether two different pharmacotherapy strategies of steroid administration impact hearing preservation in adult patients who underwent cochlear implantation with the Oticon Medical Neuro cochlear implant system. Methods: Twenty nine adult participants were included. Pure tone audiometry was performed before implantation, during processor activation and 12 months after activation. There were three treatment groups: (1) intravenous steroid therapy (standard steroid therapy with dexamethasone administrated intravenously at the dose 0.1 mg/kg body mass twice a day); (2) combined oral and intravenous steroid therapy (extended steroid therapy with dexamethasone administrated intravenously at the dose 0.1 mg/kg b.m. twice a day and prednisone (orally) at the dose 1 mg/kg body mass/24 h), and (3) no steroid therapy (a control group). Patients’ hearing thresholds before implantation were on average 103 dB HL, 89 dB HL, and 93 dB HL, respectively. Results: Deterioration of hearing thresholds was observed in all three patients’ groups. Twelve months after surgery the patients with and without steroid therapy had similar hearing thresholds. Conclusions: The steroid regimen used in this study did not play a significant role in patients with non-functional residual hearing, who underwent cochlear implantation with the Oticon Medical Neuro cochlear implant system.

The main aim of this study was to assess the clinical effect of steroids (dexamethasone and prednisone) on hearing preservation in patients who underwent cochlear implantation with different cochlear implant systems (Oticon®, Advanced Bionics®, Med-El®). 147 adult patients met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled to the study and divided into three groups depending on the brand of cochlear implant they received and participated in all follow-up visits regularly. They were also randomly divided into three subgroups depending on the steroid administration regime: (1) intravenous dexamethasone (0.1 mg/kg body weight twice a day for three days); (2) combined intravenous and oral steroids (dexamethasone 0.1 mg/kg body weight twice a day plus prednisone 1 mg/kg weight once a day); and (3) no steroids (control group). The results were measured by pure tone audiometry (PTA) at three time points: (i) before implantation, (ii) at processor activation, and (iii) 12 months after activation. A hearing preservation (HP) figure was also calculated by comparing the preoperative results and the results after 12 months. Further measures collected were electrode impedance and hearing threshold in the non-operated ear. The highest HP measures (partial and complete) were obtained in the subgroups who were given steroids. Of the 102 patients given steroids, HP was partial or complete in 63 of them (62%). In comparison, partial or complete HP was achieved in only 15 patients out of 45 (33%) who were not given steroids. There were differences between the three cochlear implant groups, with the Med-El and Advanced Bionics groups performing better than the Oticon group (45% and 43% of the former two groups achieved partial or complete HP compared to 20% in the latter). Hearing thresholds in the non-operated ear were stable over 12 months. Generally, impedance was slightly lower in the 12 month follow-up in comparison with the activation period, with the exception of the Oticon group. (4) Conclusions: Pharmacological treatment with steroids in patients undergoing cochlear implantation helps to preserve residual hearing.

(1) Background: The main aim of this study was to assess the clinical effectiveness of two different schemes of administration of steroids ((1) dexamethasone administered intravenously in comparison with (2) combination of steroid treatments: orally administered prednisone and intravenously administered dexamethasone) in comparison with a control group (no steroid administration) on hearing preservation (HP) in patients who underwent an Advanced Bionics cochlear implantation. (2) Methods: Thirty-five adult patients met the inclusion criteria. All patients were randomly divided into three subgroups depending on the scheme of steroid administration: (1) the first subgroup with only intravenously administered dexamethasone (0.1 mg per kg body weight twice a day for three days), (2) the second subgroup with a combination of methods of administration of steroids (intravenous and oral steroid therapy (dexamethasone, 0.1 mg/kg body weight twice a day plus prednisone, 1 mg/kg weight once a day for three days before surgery and after administration of dexamethasone (4th, 5th, 6th day) and after this time the dose of prednisone was reduced)) and (3) the third subgroup without steroid therapy (control group). The results were measured by pure tone audiometry (PTA) in three periods: (1) before implantation, (2) during activation of the processor (one month after implantation), and (3) 12 months after activation. Patients’ hearing thresholds before implantation were on average 82 dB HL, 77 dB HL, and 88 dB HL, respectively. (3) Results: The majority of the patients from the first subgroup had hearing preserved partially (77.8%). A similar result was observed in the second study group (oral + i.v.) (partial hearing preservation was found in 61.5% of the participants). The opposite was true in the control group; a plurality of control patients (38.5%) had no measurable hearing 12 months after the activation of the processor. (4) Conclusions: Pharmacological treatment consisting of the administration of steroids in patients who had undergone cochlear implantation with the Advanced Bionics HiRes Ultra 3D cochlear implant system may be beneficial for preserving residual hearing in patients.

BackgroundA retrospective clinical study was conducted to test the impact of including hyperbaric oxygen therapy in the treatment of patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL).Materials and methodsA total of 63 adult patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss diagnosed between 2015 and 2023 were divided into two groups: 36 patients treated with intratympanic glucocorticoid and orally administered glucocorticoid who also underwent hyperbaric oxygen therapy and 27 patients treated with intratympanic glucocorticoid and prolonged orally administered glucocorticoid (without hyperbaric oxygen therapy). An audiological evaluation was performed using pure-tone audiometry.ResultsAverage hearing gain as measured by pure tone average was 12.5 dB HL (+/- 19.9 dB HL) in the patients treated with steroids combined with HBOT, and was 14.1 dB HL (+/- 17.9 dB) in the patients treated with steroids alone. Successful treatment (complete recovery or marked improvement) was observed in 27.8% of the patients in the first group and in 25.5% in the second group. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups.ConclusionBoth groups of patients—those treated with glucocorticoids and those treated with glucocorticoids and HBOT—had similar hearing outcomes. A prospective, controlled, and randomized study would provide more reliable knowledge about the efficacy of HBOT in treating SSNHL.

Wprowadzenie: Porażenie nerwu twarzowego jest poważnym problemem społecznym i klinicznym, a jednocześnie najczęstszym schorzeniem występującym w obrębie nerwu VII. Objawia się ono niemożnością wykonywania pewnych ruchów, która wynika z braku dopływu do mięśni bodźców nerwowych. Jest to niepełnosprawność silnie wpływająca na codzienne funkcjonowanie pacjenta i znacznie obniżająca jakość jego życia. Widoczna dla otoczenia asymetria twarzy, trudności w procesie jedzenia oraz niemożność domknięcia szpary powiekowej są najdotkliwiej odczuwalne przez pacjenta. W przebiegu zakażenia ucha środkowego porażenie nerwu twarzowego jest niezwykle rzadkie. Opis przypadku: Niniejszy opis przypadku zawiera historię leczenia obecnie 33-letniego pacjenta, u którego porażenie nerwu twarzowego wystąpiło jako powikłanie po zapaleniu ucha środkowego. Opis przypadku przygotowano na podstawie historii choroby, danych medycznych oraz wyników badań pacjenta. Wnioski: Zastosowane leczenie i terapia pozwoliły na pełne przywrócenie prawidłowych funkcji nerwu twarzowego, co przełożyło się na prawidłowe funkcjonowanie pacjenta w społeczeństwie. Słowa kluczowe: zapalenie ucha środkowego • porażenie nerwu twarzowego • powikłania po zapaleniu ucha środkowego • powikłania wewnątrzczaszkowe

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The electrode length is one of the many factors impacted on results of cochlear implantation. Among lateral wall flexible electrode arrays the latest one is FLEX26 (MED-EL GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria). The main aim of the study was to evaluate the preservation of residual hearing, the level of speech understanding, and quality of life after cochlear implantation with FLEX26 electrode array. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The study was conducted in a tertiary referral centre. Fifty-two patients implanted unilaterally with FLEX26, including 10 EAS patients (electric acoustic stimulation) and 42 ES patients (electric stimulation). The intervention was minimally invasive cochlear implantation via the round window. Pure-tone audiometry (0.125–8 kHz) was performed preoperatively and at 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Twelve-month hearing preservation was established using HEARRING group formula. Quality of life was measured with AQoL-8D (Assessment of Quality of Life–8 Dimensions) pre- and postoperatively. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Residual hearing was preserved in 88.8% EAS patients. Quality of life was significantly better postoperatively in comparison to preoperative period (the effect size for overall quality of life was 0.49). Especially, it increased in relationships and senses dimensions (the effect sizes 0.47 and 0.44, respectively). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Preservation of residual hearing can be achieved in the majority of patients implanted with FLEX26. Improvement of quality of life was also documented. FLEX26 seems to be an option for surgeons who seek an electrode providing sufficient cochlear coverage.

Złośliwe zapalenie ucha zewnętrznego jest bardzo rzadko występującą chorobą przewodu słuchowego zewnętrznego oraz kości podstawy czaszki. Schorzenie to może zagrażać życiu chorego, ponieważ prowadzi do martwiczego zapalenia kości. Obserwuje się je najczęściej u osób starszych chorujących na cukrzycę i pacjentów z obniżoną odpornością. Rozpoznanie choroby opiera się na badaniach obrazowych, laboratoryjnych i mikrobiologicznych. Z badań wynika, że etiologicznym czynnikiem izolowanym najczęściej jest <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>.