Background and objectives:COVID-19 related inflammation, endothelial dysfunction and coagulopathy may increase the bleeding risk and lower efficacy of revascularization treatments in patients with acute ischemic stroke. We aimed to evaluate the safety and outcomes of revascularization treatments in patients with acute ischemic stroke and COVID-19.Methods:Retrospective multicenter cohort study of consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke receiving intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and/or endovascular treatment (EVT) between March 2020 and June 2021, tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection. With a doubly-robust model combining propensity score weighting and multivariate regression, we studied the association of COVID-19 with intracranial bleeding complications and clinical outcomes. Subgroup analyses were performed according to treatment groups (IVT-only and EVT).Results:Of a total of 15128 included patients from 105 centers, 853 (5.6%) were diagnosed with COVID-19. 5848 (38.7%) patients received IVT-only, and 9280 (61.3%) EVT (with or without IVT). Patients with COVID-19 had a higher rate of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.53; 95% CI 1.16–2.01), symptomatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SSAH) (OR 1.80; 95% CI 1.20–2.69), SICH and/or SSAH combined (OR 1.56; 95% CI 1.23–1.99), 24-hour (OR 2.47; 95% CI 1.58–3.86) and 3-month mortality (OR 1.88; 95% CI 1.52–2.33).COVID-19 patients also had an unfavorable shift in the distribution of the modified Rankin score at 3 months (OR 1.42; 95% CI 1.26–1.60).Discussion:Patients with acute ischemic stroke and COVID-19 showed higher rates of intracranial bleeding complications and worse clinical outcomes after revascularization treatments than contemporaneous non-COVID-19 treated patients. Current available data does not allow direct conclusions to be drawn on the effectiveness of revascularization treatments in COVID-19 patients, or to establish different treatment recommendations in this subgroup of patients with ischemic stroke. Our findings can be taken into consideration for treatment decisions, patient monitoring and establishing prognosis.

Background and Objectives:Declines in stroke admission, intravenous thrombolysis, and mechanical thrombectomy volumes were reported during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. There is a paucity of data on the longer-term effect of the pandemic on stroke volumes over the course of a year and through the second wave of the pandemic. We sought to measure the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the volumes of stroke admissions, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), and mechanical thrombectomy over a one-year period at the onset of the pandemic (March 1, 2020, to February 28, 2021) compared with the immediately preceding year (March 1, 2019, to February 29, 2020).Methods:We conducted a longitudinal retrospective study across 6 continents, 56 countries, and 275 stroke centers. We collected volume data for COVID-19 admissions and 4 stroke metrics: ischemic stroke admissions, ICH admissions, intravenous thrombolysis treatments, and mechanical thrombectomy procedures. Diagnoses were identified by their ICD-10 codes or classifications in stroke databases.Results:There were 148,895 stroke admissions in the one-year immediately before compared to 138,453 admissions during the one-year pandemic, representing a 7% decline (95% confidence interval [95% CI 7.1, 6.9]; p<0.0001). ICH volumes declined from 29,585 to 28,156 (4.8%, [5.1, 4.6]; p<0.0001) and IVT volume from 24,584 to 23,077 (6.1%, [6.4, 5.8]; p<0.0001). Larger declines were observed at high volume compared to low volume centers (all p<0.0001). There was no significant change in mechanical thrombectomy volumes (0.7%, [0.6,0.9]; p=0.49). Stroke was diagnosed in 1.3% [1.31,1.38] of 406,792 COVID-19 hospitalizations. SARS-CoV-2 infection was present in 2.9% ([2.82,2.97], 5,656/195,539) of all stroke hospitalizations.Discussion:There was a global decline and shift to lower volume centers of stroke admission volumes, ICH volumes, and IVT volumes during the 1st year of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the prior year. Mechanical thrombectomy volumes were preserved. These results suggest preservation in the stroke care of higher severity of disease through the first pandemic year.Trial Registration Information:This study is registered underNCT04934020.

The most commonly used therapeutic option for the prevention of ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation is new- or old-generation oral anticoagulants. New oral anticoagulants are at least as effective as old-generation oral anticoagulants in the prevention of ischemic stroke, with a reduced risk of life-threatening hemorrhage. Moreover, the constant monitoring of these drugs in the patient’s blood is not required during routine use. However, ischemic stroke can still occur in these patients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the pattern of risk factors for ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with new oral anticoagulants. Our multicenter retrospective study involved 2032 patients with acute ischemic stroke. The experimental group consisted of 256 patients with acute ischemic stroke and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, who were treated with new oral anticoagulants. The control group consisted of 1776 ischemic stroke patients without coexisting atrial fibrillation. The results of our study show that patients with atrial fibrillation treated with new oral anticoagulants are more likely to display thrombotic, proatherogenic, and proinflammatory factors in addition to the embolic factors associated with atrial fibrillation. Therefore, solely taking new oral anticoagulants is insufficient in protecting this group of patients from ischemic stroke.

Background: Heart rate variability (HRV) is a non-invasive marker of autonomic nervous system function that is based on the analysis of length differences between subsequent RR intervals of the electrocardiogram. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the current knowledge gap in the utility of HRV parameters and their value as predictors of the acute stroke course.Methods: A systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Relevant articles published between 1 January 2016 and 1 November 2022 available in the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were obtained using a systematic search strategy. The following keywords were used to screen the publications: “heart rate variability” AND/OR “HRV” AND “stroke.” The eligibility criteria that clearly identified and described outcomes and outlined restrictions on HRV measurement were pre-established by the authors. Articles assessing the relationship between HRV measured in the acute phase of stroke and at least one stroke outcome were considered. The observation period did not exceed 12 months. Studies that included patients with medical conditions influencing HRV with no established stroke etiology and non-human subjects were excluded from the analysis. To minimize the risk of bias, disagreements throughout the search and analysis were resolved by two independent supervisors.Results: Of the 1,305 records obtained from the systematic search based on keywords, 36 were included in the final review. These publications provided insight into the usability of linear and non-linear HRV analysis in predicting the course, complications, and mortality of stroke. Furthermore, some modern techniques, such as HRV biofeedback, for the improvement of cognition performance after a stroke are discussed.Discussion: The present study showed that HRV could be considered a promising biomarker of a stroke outcome and its complications. However, further research is needed to establish a methodology for appropriate quantification and interpretation of HRV-derived parameters.

Objectives: Endothelial dysfunction (ED) has been linked to the pathogenesis of cerebral small vessel disease (SVD). We aimed to assess ED and cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) in the patients with a diverse manifestation of SVD, with similar and extensive white matter lesions (WMLs, modified Fazekas scale grade ≥2), compared with a control group (CG) without the MRI markers of SVD, matched for age, gender, hypertension, diabetes, and to evaluate the change of CVR following 24 months.Methods: We repeatedly measured the vasomotor reactivity reserve (VMRr) and breath-holding index (BHI) of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) by the transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) techniques in 60 subjects above 60 years with a history of lacunar stroke (LS), vascular dementia (VaD), or parkinsonism (VaP) (20 in each group), and in 20 individuals from a CG.Results: The mean age, frequency of the main vascular risk factors, and sex distribution were similar in the patients with the SVD groups and a CG. The VMRr and the BHI were more severely impaired at baseline (respectively, 56.7 ± 18% and 0.82 ± 0.39) and at follow-up (respectively, 52.3 ± 16.7% and 0.71 ± 0.38) in the patients with SVD regardless of the clinical manifestations (ANOVA, p &gt; 0.1) than in the CG (respectively, baseline VMRr 77.2 ± 15.6%, BHI 1.15 ± 0.47, p &lt; 0.001; follow-up VMRr 74.3 ± 17.6%, BHI 1.11 ± 0.4, p &lt; 0.001). All the assessed CVR measures (VMRr and BHI) significantly decreased over time in the subjects with SVD (Wilcoxon's signed-rank test p = 0.01), but this was not observed in the CG (p &gt; 0.1) and the decrease of CVR measures was not related to the SVD radiological progression (p &gt; 0.1).Conclusions: This study provided evidence that the change in CVR measures is detectable over a 24-month period in patients with different clinical manifestations of SVD. Compared with the patients in CG with similar atherothrombotic risk factors, all the CVR measures (BMRr and BHI) significantly declined over time in the subjects with SVD. The reduction in CVR was not related to the SVD radiological progression.