SummaryIntravenous heparin followed by oral anticoagulant therapy (e. g. with coumarin) is still the most widely used treatment for deep venous thromboembolism. Self-administered subcutaneous injections of heparin have been thought of as a promising alternative to coumarin, but the high doses required for ongoing prophylaxis have raised concerns about the possible development of bone disease. Certainly, long-term heparin therapy has been reported to cause osteoporosis in both laboratory animals and humans.This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of unfractionated (UF) heparin with that of a low molecular weight heparin (Fragmin®, Kabi Pharmacia) in the prevention of recurrent deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) in a consecutive series of patients with contraindications to coumarin therapy. The patients comprised 40 men and 40 women, aged between 19 and 92 years (mean age, 68 years). They had all previously been diagnosed as having acute DVT and had been treated with conventional doses of heparin while in hospital. All patients had at least one of the following conditions: recent blood loss (either spontaneous or during admission while receiving heparin therapy); active gastroduodenal ulcer disease; psychological or physical inability or unwillingness to understand and accept the need for regular laboratory monitoring during coumarin treatment; chronic alcoholism; dementia; pregnancy; recent neurosurgery, and pericardial effusion; or were over 80 years of age. They were randomly allocated to receive either UF heparin, 10,000 IU s.c. b.d., or Fragmin®, 5000 IU anti-Factor Xa s. c. b. d., for a period of 3-6 months.Two patients taking UF heparin were readmitted to hospital 2 and 3 months after discharge, owing to symptomatic, scintigraphically proven recurrent PE. No patients receiving Fragmin® had recurrent PE. There were 10 reports of minor bleeding: six in patients receiving UF heparin and four in patients on Fragmin®. Furthermore, there were seven cases of spinal fracture: six in patients on UF heparin, and one in a patient taking Fragmin®.We conclude that fixed doses of both UFH and Fragmin® appear to be quite effective and safe for use in patients with a high risk of bleeding. In our experience, however, UF heparin is associated with an unacceptably high incidence of spinal fracture.
The purpose of this study is to describe the clinical and radiological manifestations of patients with the synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis, and osteitis (SAPHO) syndrome. Retrospective study (1984-2007) was performed in a single center. All patients with the SAPHO syndrome were included. Fifty-two patients were included: 26 male, mean age at diagnosis is 42±12 years. Ostearticular involvement was present before cutaneous involvement in 59.6% of patients and concomitantly in 23.5%. Anterior chest pain was the commonest clinical manifestation, it was present in 38 patients (73%), followed by peripheral arthritis in 17 patients (32%), and sacroliliac pain in 14 patients (26.9%). Cutaneous involvement was present in 33 patients (63.5%). HLA B27 antigen was present in eight patients (17.7%). Bone scintigraphy showed an increased uptake in 42 patients (93.3%). The location of the uptake was mainly in sternoclavicular and manubriosternal joints. CT scan was performed in all "hot joints" showing sclerosis, erosions, hyperostosis, and soft tissue involvement. Refractory patients were treated mainly with pamidronate. Although SAPHO syndrome is an entity that share features that fit into a variety of established disease categories, the present study has a homogenous clinical and radiological pattern that gives support to believe that the SAPHO syndrome is an isolated clinical entity.
Rituximab can be an effective treatment option for patients who have refractory lupus with severe or life-threatening disease with an acceptable tolerance profile.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.