Objective: The aim of the present study was to assess the concurrent and construct validity of two diet-quality indices, a modified Mediterranean diet score (mMDS) and a Mediterranean-like diet score (MLDS) additionally incorporating unhealthy food choices, as determined by an FFQ. Design: A validation study assessing FFQ intake estimates compared with ten or more unannounced 24 h recalls. Pearson's correlation coefficients, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), Bland-Altman plots and the limits of agreement method were used to assess the between-method agreement of scores. Construct validity was shown using associations between nutrient intakes derived from multiple 24 h recalls and the mMDS and MLDS derived from the FFQ. Setting: Gerona, Spain. Subjects: A total of 107 consecutively selected participants from a populationbased cross-sectional survey. Results: Pearson's correlations for the energy-adjusted mMDS and MLDS compared with multiple recalls were 0?48 and 0?62, respectively. The average FFQ energy-adjusted mMDS and MLDS were 102 % and 98 % of the recall-based mMDS and MLDS estimates, respectively. The FFQ under-and overestimated dietary recall estimates of the energy-adjusted MLDS by 28 % and 25 %, respectively, with slightly wider boundaries for the mMDS (31 % and 34 %). The ICC, which assesses absolute agreement, was similar to Pearson's correlations (mMDS 5 0?48 and MLDS 5 0?61). The mean differences between methods were similar across the range of average ratings for both scores, indicating the absence of bias. The FFQderived mMDS and MLDS correlated in the anticipated directions with intakes of eleven (73?3 %) and thirteen of fifteen nutrients (86?7 %), respectively. Conclusions: The FFQ provides valid estimates of diet quality as assessed by the mMDS and MLDS.

Abdominal obesity is a strong predictor of metabolic disorders. Prospective data on the association between the Mediterranean diet and surrogate markers of abdominal adiposity are scarce. The present study evaluated the relationship between adherence to the Mediterranean diet and (1) changes in waist circumference (WC) and (2) 10-year incidence of abdominal obesity. We conducted a prospective, populationbased study in 3058 male and female Spaniards aged 25 -74 years, followed from 2000 to 2009. Dietary intake and leisure-time physical activity levels were recorded using validated questionnaires. Weight, height and WC were measured. Adherence to the Mediterranean diet, determined using the previously validated REGICOR-Mediterranean diet score (R-MDS), based on the distribution of population food intake and on the dietary recommendations (MDS-rec), was negatively associated with WC gain (P¼0·007 and 0·024, respectively) in fully adjusted models. In the multivariate logistic analysis, the odds of abdominal obesity incidence decreased across the tertiles of the R-MDS, but the association was not significant. In conclusion, adherence to the Mediterranean diet was associated with lower abdominal fat gain, but not with 10-year incidence of abdominal obesity.

Adults' consumption of soft drinks was associated with increased WC and odds of 10-y incidence of abdominal obesity. This association was moderate but consistent in all statistical models.

No abstract

BackgroundDiet is an important factor in the prevention of chronic diseases. Analysis of secular trends of dietary patterns can be biased by energy under-reporting. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to analyse the impact of energy under-reporting on dietary patterns and secular trends in dietary patterns defined by cluster analysis.Design and methodsTwo cross-sectional population-based surveys were conducted in Spain, in 2000 and 2005, with 3058 and 6352 participants, respectively, aged 25 to 74 years. Validated questionnaire was used to collect dietary data. Cluster analysis was run separately for all participants, plausible energy reporters (PER), and energy under-reporters (EUR) to define dietary patterns.ResultsThree clusters, “healthy”, “mixed” and “western”, were identified for both surveys. The “mixed” cluster was the predominant cluster in both surveys. Excluding EUR reduced the proportion of the “mixed” cluster up to 6.40% in the 2000 survey; this caused secular trend increase in the prevalence of the “mixed” pattern. Cross-classification analysis of all participants and PER’ data showed substantial agreement in cluster assignments: 68.7% in 2000 and 84.4% in 2005. Excluding EUR did not cause meaningful (≥15%) changes in the “healthy” pattern. It provoked changes in consumption of some food groups in the “mixed” and “western” patterns: mainly decreases of unhealthy foods within the 2000 and increases of unhealthy foods within the 2005 surveys. Secular trend effects of EUR were similar to those within the 2005 survey. Excluding EUR reversed the direction of secular trends in consumption of several food groups in PER in the “mixed” and “western” patterns.ConclusionsEUR affected distribution of participants between dietary patterns within and between surveys, secular trends in food group consumption and amount of food consumed in all, but not in the “healthy” pattern. Our findings emphasize threats from energy under-reporting in dietary data analysis.