Pipefishes Stigmatopora argus and S. nigra were collected dunng field expenments to test responses of seagrass-associated fishes to changes in the height and density of seagrass leaves. Most pipefish greatly preferred long, high-density seagrass leaves to short or low-density leaves. The exception was female S. argus, which were found in thinned long seagrass as often as in dense long. Females of both species had fuller guts than males Irrespective of habitat, consistent with the idea that males suffer some loss of feeding efficiency due to adaptations for brooding young. Sex ratios measured at 2 different spatial scales were biased in favour of males for both species. For both species the clutch size of male pipefish with completely filled broodpouches was, on average, the same as the number of developing ovanan eggs in females. These results are revlewed in light of current sexual selection theory.
Fisheries managers are becoming increasingly aware of the need to quantify all forms of harvest, including that by recreational fishers. This need has been driven by both a growing recognition of the potential impact that noncommercial fishers can have on exploited resources and the requirement to allocate catch limits between different sectors of the wider fishing community in many jurisdictions. Marine recreational fishers are rarely required to report any of their activity, and some form of survey technique is usually required to estimate levels of recreational catch and effort. In this review, we describe and discuss studies that have attempted to estimate the nature and extent of recreational harvests of marine fishes in New Zealand and Australia over the past 20 years. We compare studies
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.