The error-free and efficient repair of DNA double-stranded breaks (DSBs) is extremely important for cell survival. RNA has been implicated in the resolution of DNA damage but the mechanism remains poorly understood. Here, we show that miRNA biogenesis enzymes, Drosha and Dicer, control the recruitment of repair factors from multiple pathways to sites of damage. Depletion of Drosha significantly reduces DNA repair by both homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). Drosha is required within minutes of break induction, suggesting a central and early role for RNA processing in DNA repair. Sequencing of DNA:RNA hybrids reveals RNA invasion around DNA break sites in a Drosha-dependent manner. Removal of the RNA component of these structures results in impaired repair. These results show how RNA can be a direct and critical mediator of DNA damage repair in human cells.

Effective DNA repair is essential for cell survival: a failure to correctly repair damage leads to the accumulation of mutations and is the driving force for carcinogenesis. Multiple pathways have evolved to protect against both intrinsic and extrinsic genotoxic events, and recent developments have highlighted an unforeseen critical role for RNA in ensuring genome stability. It is currently unclear exactly how RNA molecules participate in the repair pathways, although many models have been proposed and it is possible that RNA acts in diverse ways to facilitate DNA repair. A number of well-documented DNA repair factors have been described to have RNA-binding capacities and, moreover, screens investigating DNA-damage repair mechanisms have identified RNA-binding proteins as a major group of novel factors involved in DNA repair. In this review, we integrate some of these datasets to identify commonalities that might highlight novel and interesting factors for future investigations. This emerging role for RNA opens up a new dimension in the field of DNA repair; we discuss its impact on our current understanding of DNA repair processes and consider how it might influence cancer progression.

The recent discovery of DNA:RNA hybrids, or R-loops, actively forming at DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) has unlocked fresh insight into how RNA participates in DNA repair. However, the manner of DSB-induced R-loop formation is vital in determining its mechanism of action and is currently under debate. Here, we analyse published DNA:RNA-hybrid sequencing to elucidate the features that determine DSB-induced R-loop formation. We found that pre-existing transcriptional activity was critical for R-loop generation at break sites, suggesting that these RNAs are transcribed prior to break induction. In addition, this appeared to be a specific DSB response at the break, distinct from traditional, co-transcriptionally formed R-loops. We hypothesise that R-loop formation is orchestrated by the damage response at transcriptionally active DSB loci to specifically maintain these genomic regions. Further investigation is required to fully understand how canonical repair processes regulate R-loops at breaks and how they participate in the repair process.

DNA Double-Strand Breaks (DSBs) repair is essential to safeguard genome integrity but the contribution of chromosome folding into this process remains elusive. Here we unveiled basic principles of chromosome dynamics upon DSBs in mammalian cells, controlled by key kinases from the DNA Damage Response. We report that ATM is responsible for the reinforcement of topologically associating domains (TAD) that experience a DSB. ATM further drives the formation of a new chromatin sub-compartment (“D” compartment) upon clustering of damaged TADs decorated with γH2AX and 53BP1. “D” compartment formation mostly occurs in G1, is independent of cohesin and is enhanced upon DNA-PK pharmacological inhibition. Importantly, a subset of DNA damage responsive genes that are upregulated following DSBs also physically localize in the D sub-compartment and this ensures their optimal activation, providing a function for DSB clustering in activating the DNA Damage Response. However, these DSB-induced changes in genome organization also come at the expense of an increased translocations rate, which we could also detect on cancer genomes. Overall, our work provides a function for DSB-induced compartmentalization in orchestrating the DNA Damage Response and highlights the critical impact of chromosome architecture in genomic instability.