We performed epidemiologic studies at public freshwater bathing sites in Germany to provide a better scientific basis for the definition of recreational water quality standards. A total of 2,196 participants were recruited from the local population and randomized into bathers and non-bathers. Bathers were exposed for 10 min and had to immerse their head at least three times. Water samples for microbiological analysis were collected at 20-min intervals. Unbiased concentration–response effects with no-observed-adverse-effect levels (NOAELs) were demonstrated for three different definitions of gastroenteritis and four fecal indicator organisms. Relative risks for bathing in waters with levels above NOAELs compared with nonbathing ranged from 1.8 (95% CI, 1.2–2.6) to 4.6 (95% CI, 2.1–10.1), depending on the definition of gastroenteritis. The effect of swallowing water provided additional evidence for true dose–response relationships. Based on the NOAELs, the following guide values for water quality are suggested: 100 Escherichia coli, 25 intestinal enterococci, 10 somatic coliphages, or 10 Clostridium perfringens per 100 mL. Recreational water quality standards are intended to protect the health of those consumers who are not already immune or resistant to pathogens that may be associated with indicator organisms. In contrast to current World Health Organization recommendations, we concluded that standards should be based on rates of compliance with NOAELs rather than on attributable risks determined above NOAELs, because these risks depend mainly on the unpredictable susceptibility of the cohorts. Although in theory there is no threshold in real concentration–response relationships, we demonstrated that a NOAEL approach would be a more robust and practical solution to the complex problem of setting standards.
This report describes a new technique for the detection and identification of Salmonella species in food with the use of fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) with 23S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes. Two species-specific 23S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes (Sal-1 and Sal-3) were selected, and one (Sal-544) was newly designed. The relative specificities of these probes were compared with those of bacterial 23S rRNA sequences from the GenBank database and tested by in situ hybridization with bacterial cell smears of pure cultures. Fifty-one tested reference strains of Salmonella serovars belonging to subspecies I (enterica) hybridized with these probes. No cross-reactions with 46 other strains of the family Enterobacteriaceae or with another 14 bacterial strains from other families were observed. Storage of a Salmonella Panama test strain under various environmental conditions (2, 5, and 15% NaC1; -20 degrees C, 4 degrees C, and room temperature; pHs of 3.3 to 7.4) did not adversely affect the FISH method. No matrix effects were observed with 18 different kinds of foods. FISH was able to detect Salmonella spp. in 52 (probe Sal-1), 56 (probe Sal-3), and 35 (probe Sal-544) of 225 naturally contaminated food samples after 16 h of incubation in a preenrichment broth. When conventional culture and detection methods were used, Salmonella could be isolated from only 30 of these 225 samples. In contrast, FISH failed to identify Salmonella in only two of the culture-positive samples when Sal-1 and Sal-3 were used and in only three of the culture-positive samples when Sal-544 was used.
This clinical prediction rule provides a novel and diagnostically accurate strategy for the potential prevention and improved management of kidney complications in patients with NE and, ultimately, for a possible decrease in unnecessary hospitalization in a high number of patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.