No abstract

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a global public health concern associated with high morbidity, mortality, and health-care costs, and the therapeutic measures are still limited. This study aims to investigate crucial genes correlated with AKI, and their potential functions, which might contribute to a better understanding of AKI pathogenesis. The highthroughput data GSE52004 and GSE98622 were downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus; four group sets were extracted and integrated. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the four group sets were identified by limma package in R software. The overlapping DEGs among four group sets were further analyzed by the VennDiagram package, and their potential functions were analyzed by the GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses using the DAVID database. Furthermore, the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed by STRING, and the functional modules of the PPI network were filtered by MCODE and ClusterOne in Cytoscape. Hub genes of overlapping DEGs were identified by Cyto-Hubba and cytoNCA. The expression of 35 key genes was validated by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). Western blot and immunofluorescence were performed to validate an important gene Egr1. A total of 722 overlapping DEGs were differentially expressed in at least three group sets. These genes mainly enriched in cell proliferation and fibroblast proliferation. Additionally, 5 significant modules and 21 hub genes, such as Havcr1, Krt20, Sox9, Egr1, Timp1, Serpine1, Edn1, and Apln were screened by analyzing the PPI networks. The 5 significant modules were mainly enriched in complement and coagulation cascades and Metabolic pathways, and the top 21 hub genes were mainly enriched in positive regulation of cell proliferation. Through validation, Krt20 were identified as the top 1 upregulated genes with a log2 (fold change) larger than 10 in all these 35 genes, and 21 genes were validated as significantly upregulated; Egr1 was validated as an upregulated gene in AKI in both RNA and protein level. In conclusion, by integrated analysis of different high-throughput data and validation by experiment, several crucial genes were identified in AKI, such as Havcr1, Krt20, Sox9, Egr1, Timp1, Serpine1, Edn1, and Apln. These genes were very important in the process of AKI, which could be further utilized to explore novel diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

No abstract

free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website.Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre -including this research content -immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

ConclusionPatients treated with TT or RR for UTUC showed comparable OS, CSS, RFS and postoperative renal function. Our data suggest that bladder cuff removal is not imperative in the treatment of distal ureteric UTUC, and TT can be a safe solution in selected cases.

Objectives: To compare segmental ureterectomy (SU) and radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) in terms of overall survival (OS) and impact on postoperative renal function in patients treated for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) of the ureter with preoperatively reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Materials and methods: We retrospectively collected the data of consecutive patients treated for UTUC, in 6 Italian tertiary referral centers, from 2003 to 2013, and analyzed those treated with RNU or SU for ureteral cancer and with a preoperative eGFR <90 ml/min/1.73m 2. The primary outcome was to compare the postoperative eGFR variation and the OS according to the surgical technique chosen. Results: Out of 521 patients with UTUC, 228 patients had preoperative reduced eGFR. Out of these patients, 93 had ureteral cancer and were included in the primary analyses − 67 (72.0%) treated with RNU and 26 (28.0%) with SU. Preoperative characteristics were similar in the 2 groups. The overall median follow-up period was 26.5 months. A nonsignificant postoperative eGFR decrease of 3.0 ml/min/1.73m 2 was found overall (P = 0.094), with nonsignificant difference between the 2 groups (P = 0.735). A comparable 5-year OS was calculated for RNU and SU patients (P = 0.99). Conclusions: The type of surgery (SU vs. RNU) has a low impact on postoperative renal function and OS in patients with ureteral cancer and preoperative eGFR <90 ml/min/1.73m 2. The indications for kidney sparing surgery for UTUC should be based on the surgical and oncological risks in these patients.

No abstract

Background: The indications for retrograde intra-renal surgery (RIRS) have greatly increased, however, there is still no consensus on the use of spinal anesthesia (SA) during this procedure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the comparability of surgical conditions and outcomes with RIRS performed under SA versus general anesthesia (GA) for renal stones. Materials and methods: This was a prospective, observational study in patients scheduled for RIRS in a single teaching hospital in Italy. Inclusion criteria were age >18 years and the presence of single or multiple renal stones. We recorded information concerning the site of lithiasis, the number of calculi, total stone burden, and the presence of concomitant ureteral stones or hydronephrosis. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed to evaluate the results in terms of surgical outcome, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and analgesia demand balanced for confounding factors. Patients were followed-up until day 90 from discharge. Results: We included 120 patients, the propensity score-matched cohort included 40 patients in the SA and 40 in the GA groups. The stone-free rate was 67.5% in the GA group and 70.0% in the SA group ( p = 0.81). The use of auxiliary procedures within 90 days did not differ between groups (25.0% vs. 22.5%, p = 0.79). No cases of conversion from SA to GA were recorded. We did not find any differences in intraoperative bleedings, perforations, and abortions. Complication rates were similar in the 2 groups (10.0% in GA vs. 5.0% in SA, p = 0.64). Conclusions: In our cohort, RIRS performed under SA and GA was equivalent in terms of surgical results and complications.