Background Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting in acute stroke due to severe basilar artery stenosis or basilar artery occlusion remain a matter of debate. The higher risk of stroke recurrence in patients with vertebrobasilar stenosis compared to anterior circulation atherosclerotic disease creates high expectations concerning endovascular approaches. This study aims to review our experience with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting in acute stroke caused by basilar artery steno-occlusive disease. Methods Our prospective database from June 2014 until December 2020 was screened and patients with acutely symptomatic severe (>80%) basilar artery stenosis or acute basilar artery occlusion who underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting were analysed. Results Twenty-five patients included: 72% men (mean age 68.6 years), all with prior modified Rankin Scale <2. Twelve presented with acute basilar artery occlusion and were submitted to mechanical thrombectomy before percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting, while the remaining had severe basilar artery stenosis. Successful stent placement was achieved in 22 (88%). Procedure-related complications included new small ischemic lesions (16%), basilar artery dissection (8%), vertebral artery dissection (12%) and death (12%). At 3 months post-percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting, 10 out of 23 patients (43.5%) were independent (mRS ≤ 2) and six died. Fourteen patients underwent transcranial Doppler ultrasound 3 months post-percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting: 12 showed residual stenosis, one significant stent restenosis and one presented stent occlusion. Conclusions Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting showed to be a technically feasible and reasonably safe procedure in selected patients. However, good clinical outcomes may be difficult to achieve as only 43.5% of the patients remained independent at 3 months. Randomized studies are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety outcomes of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting in acute stroke caused by basilar artery steno-occlusive disease.
Introduction: Combined intravenous therapy (IVT) and mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is the standard treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with large vessel occlusion (LVO). However, the use of IVT before MT is recently being questioned. Objectives: To compare patients treated with IVT before MT with those treated with MT alone, in a real-world scenario. Methods: Retrospective analysis of AIS patients with LVO of the anterior circulation who underwent MT, with or without previous IVT, between 2016 and 2018. Results: A total of 524 patients were included (347 submitted to IVT+MT; 177 to MT alone). No differences between groups were found except for a higher time from stroke onset to CT and to groin puncture in the MT group (297.5 min vs 115.0 min and 394.0 min vs 250.0 min respectively, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that age<75 years (OR 2.65, 95% CI 1.71À4.07, p < 0.001), not using antiplatelet therapy (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.21À3.08, p = 0.006), low prestroke mRS (OR 4.33, 95% CI 1.89À9.89, p < 0.001), initial NIHSS (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.86À0.93, p < 0.001), absent cerebral edema (OR 7.83, 95% CI 3.31À18.51, p < 0.001), and mTICI 2b/3 (OR 4.56, 95% CI 2.17À9.59, p < 0.001) were independently associated with good outcome (mRS 0-2). Conclusions: Our findings support the idea that IVT before MT does not influence prognosis, in a real-world setting.
IntroductionEndovascular treatment (EVT) with mechanical thrombectomy and acute carotid stenting has become an integral part of the treatment of acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion. Despite being included in the most recent stroke guidelines, only comprehensive centers can offer EVT and thus patients frequently need to be transferred from primary hospitals. We aimed to assess which pre-hospital model of care -direct admission to a comprehensive stroke center (mothership) or transfer to a comprehensive stroke center after the first admission to the nearest hospital (drip-and-ship) -had the most benefit in stroke patients in a Portuguese urban region.
MethodsWe selected patients admitted to a comprehensive stroke center who underwent EVTs between January 2018 and December 2020, in Lisbon, Portugal. We used data from the Safe Implementation of Treatments in Stroke (SITS) International registry on stroke severity, previous modified Rankin Scale (mRS), time from symptom onset to the first admission, time from symptom onset to the procedure, and mRS three months post stroke. We defined an unfavorable outcome as having an mRS >2 at three months post stroke. For patients with previous mRS >2, an unfavorable outcome was defined as any increase in mRS at three months post stroke.
ResultsWe analyzed the data of 1154 patients, of which 407 were admitted through a mothership approach and 747 through a drip-and-ship approach. Both groups were similar regarding sociodemographic characteristics, stroke risk factors, previous disability, and stroke severity. Median onset-to-door time was higher (126 vs 110 minutes, p-value=0.002) but onset-to-procedure time was lower (199 vs 339 minutes, p-value<0.001) in the mothership group. The mothership group had a higher proportion of patients with mRS <3 at three months post stroke than the drip-and-ship group (41.3% vs 34.9%, p-value=0.035). Mortality was similar in both groups. A multivariate logistic regression model confirmed a lower probability of unfavorable outcomes with the mothership approach (OR = 0.677, 95% CI 0.514-0.892, p-value=0.006). Surprisingly, onset-toprocedure time did not have an impact on functional outcomes.
ConclusionOur findings show that the mothership model results in better functional outcomes for patients with acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion. Further studies are needed to better define patient selection for this strategy and the impact of a mothership model in comprehensive stroke centers.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.