Progression-free survival was significantly longer with durvalumab than with placebo. The secondary end points also favored durvalumab, and safety was similar between the groups. (Funded by AstraZeneca; PACIFIC ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02125461 .).

No abstract

No abstract

Summary Background Alectinib, a highly selective, central nervous system (CNS)-active anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, demonstrated promising clinical activity in crizotinib-naïve and crizotinib-resistant ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This phase 2 study evaluated the safety and efficacy of alectinib in ALK-positive NSCLC patients who progressed on previous crizotinib. Methods This ongoing North American study (NCT01871805) enrolled patients with stage IIIB/IV ALK-positive NSCLC, who had progressed following crizotinib. Patients were treated with oral alectinib 600 mg twice daily until progression, death or withdrawal. Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) by independent review committee (IRC) using RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), intracranial ORR and DOR, safety, and patient-reported outcomes. The intent-to-treat population was used for efficacy and safety analyses, with the response evaluable population used for response endpoints. Findings A total of 87 patients were enrolled in the intent-to-treat population. All patients had received prior crizotinib therapy, and 64 patients (74%) had also received prior chemotherapy. Fifty-two patients (60%) had baseline CNS metastases, of whom 18 (35%) had received no prior brain radiation therapy. At the time of primary analysis (median follow-up 4.8 months), ORR by IRC was 48% (95% CI 36–60). Adverse events were predominantly grade 1 or 2, most commonly constipation, fatigue, myalgia and peripheral edema. The most common grade ≥3 AEs were changes in laboratory values, including increased blood creatine phosphokinase (in 8%, n=7), increased alanine aminotransferase (in 6% n=5), and increased aspartate aminotransferase (in 5% n=4). Interpretation Alectinib demonstrated clinical efficacy and was well tolerated in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC who had progressed on crizotinib. Alectinib was active in the CNS, as demonstrated by durable responses in the majority of crizotinib-resistant patients with CNS disease. Therefore, alectinib could be a suitable treatment for patients with ALK-positive disease who have progressed on crizotinib.

Introduction: In the phase 3 PACIFIC study of patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC without progression after chemoradiotherapy, durvalumab demonstrated significant improvements versus placebo in the primary end points of progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] ¼ 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.42-65, p < 0.0001) and overall survival (OS) (HR ¼ 0.68, 95% CI: 0.53-0.87, p ¼ 0.00251), with manageable safety and no detrimental effect on patient-reported outcomes. Here, we report 3-year OS rates for all patients randomized in the PACIFIC study.

Purpose: The initial goal of this study was to test the immunologic and clinical effects of a new cancer vaccine consisting of dendritic cells (DC) transduced with the full-length wild-type p53 gene delivered via an adenoviral vector in patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer. Experimental Design: Twenty-nine patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer were vaccinated repeatedly at 2-week intervals. Most of the patients received three immunizations. p53-specific responses were evaluated, and phenotype and function of Tcells, DCs, and immature myeloid cells were analyzed and correlated with antigen-specific immune responses. Objective clinical response to vaccination as well as subsequent chemotherapy was evaluated.Results: p53-specificTcell responses to vaccination were observed in 57.1% of patients. Immunologic responses to vaccination were positively associated with a moderate increase in the titer of antiadenovirus antibodies, and negatively with an accumulation of immature myeloid cells. One patient showed a clinical response to vaccination whereas most of the patients had disease progression. However, we observed a high rate of objective clinical responses to chemotherapy (61.9%) that immediately followed vaccination. Clinical response to subsequent chemotherapy was closely associated with induction of immunologic response to vaccination. Conclusions: This study provides clinical support for an emerging paradigm in cancer immunotherapy, wherein optimal use of vaccination might be more effective, not as a separate modality, but in direct combination with chemotherapy.

PurposeBoth temozolomide (TMZ) and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are active in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). This phase II, randomized, double-blind study evaluated whether addition of the PARP inhibitor veliparib to TMZ improves 4-month progression-free survival (PFS).Patients and MethodsA total of 104 patients with recurrent SCLC were randomly assigned 1:1 to oral veliparib or placebo 40 mg twice daily, days 1 to 7, and oral TMZ 150 to 200 mg/m2/day, days 1 to 5, of a 28-day cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Response was determined by imaging at weeks 4 and 8, and every 8 weeks thereafter. Improvement in PFS at 4 months was the primary end point. Secondary objectives included overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety and tolerability of veliparib with TMZ. Exploratory objectives included PARP-1 and SLFN11 immunohistochemical expression, MGMT promoter methylation, and circulating tumor cell quantification.ResultsNo significant difference in 4-month PFS was noted between TMZ/veliparib (36%) and TMZ/placebo (27%; P = .19); median OS was also not improved significantly with TMZ/veliparib (8.2 months; 95% CI, 6.4 to 12.2 months; v 7.0 months; 95% CI, 5.3 to 9.5 months; P = .50). However, ORR was significantly higher in patients receiving TMZ/veliparib compared with TMZ/placebo (39% v 14%; P = .016). Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia more commonly occurred with TMZ/veliparib: 50% versus 9% and 31% versus 7%, respectively. Significantly prolonged PFS (5.7 v 3.6 months; P = .009) and OS (12.2 v 7.5 months; P = .014) were observed in patients with SLFN11-positive tumors treated with TMZ/veliparib.ConclusionFour-month PFS and median OS did not differ between the two arms, whereas a significant improvement in ORR was observed with TMZ/veliparib. SLFN11 expression was associated with improved PFS and OS in patients receiving TMZ/veliparib, suggesting a promising biomarker of PARP-inhibitor sensitivity in SCLC.

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) are one of the major factors limiting the efficacy of immune therapy. In a clinical trial of patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) we tested the possibility that targeting MDSC can improve the induction of immune responses by a cancer vaccine. Forty-one patients with extensive stage SCLC were randomized into three arms: arm A - control, arm B - vaccination with dendritic cells transduced with wild-type p53, and arm C – vaccination in combination with MDSC targeted therapy with all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA). Interim results of the ongoing clinical trial are presented. Pre-treatment levels of MDSC populations in patients from all three arms were similar. Vaccine alone did not affect the proportion of MDSC, whereas in patients treated with ATRA the MDSC decreased more than two-fold (p=0.02). Before the start of treatment no patients had detectable p53 specific responses in IFN-γ ELISPOT. Sequential measurements did not show positive p53 responses in any of the 14 patients from arm A. After immunization, only 3 out of 15 patients (20%) from arm B developed a p53-specific response (p=0.22). In contrast, in arm C 5 out of 12 patients (41.7%) had detectable p53 responses (p=0.012). The proportion of granzyme B positive CD8+ T cells was increased only in patients from arm C but not in arm B. Depletion of MDSC substantially improved the immune response to vaccination suggesting that this approach can be used to enhance the effect of immune interventions in cancer.