Systemic hypotension during sepsis is thought to be due to nitric oxide (NO) overproduction, but it may also be due to acidosis. We evaluated in healthy rats the consequences of acid infusion on NO and blood pressure. Sprague-Dawley rats were anesthetized, and ventilated with room air. The animals were randomized into four groups. Group 1 (C, n = 10) received only normal saline at rates comparable to the other groups. Group 2 (A1, n = 10) received hydrochloric acid at 0.162 mmol in the first 15 to 30 min, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.058 mmol/h for 5 h. Group 3 (AG+A1, n = 6) was pretreated with aminoguanidine (AG, 50 mg/kg), and HCl was infused as above. Group 4 (A2, n = 7) received HCl at twice the rate used in A1. Nitric oxide concentration in the exhaled gas (ENO), blood gases, and mean arterial pressure were measured every 30 min. Acid infusion in A1 caused the pH to fall gradually from 7.43 +/- 0. 01 to 7.13 +/- 0.05. This moderate decrease in pH was associated with a marked increase in ENO (1.6 +/- 0.3 to 114.2 +/- 22.3 ppb), an increase in plasma nitrite/nitrate (17.3 +/- 3.7 to 35.2 +/- 4.3 microM), and a significant decrease in blood pressure (110.5 +/- 6.3 to 63.3 +/- 15.0 mm Hg). Furthermore, acidosis caused lung inflammation, as suggested by the increase in lung myeloperoxidase activity (282.2 +/- 24.7 to 679.3 +/- 57.3 U/min/g) and lung injury score (1.7 +/- 0.2 to 3.5 +/- 0.6). Acidosis after AG pretreatment was associated with a similar change in pH, but the increase in ENO, nitrite/nitrate, and systemic hypotension were prevented. Furthermore, lung injury was attenuated by AG, as suggested by a lower myeloperoxidase activity, though lung injury score was not altered. In this model, moderate acidosis causes increases in NO, hypotension, and lung inflammation. Lung inflammation and injury are due in part to acidosis and NO production. This is the first report to show a direct effect of chronic acidosis on NO production and lung injury. These results have profound implications on the role of acidosis on NO production and lung injury during sepsis.
Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), a chemotherapy-responsive disease, is characterized by neuroendocrine properties. In contrast, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is at best moderately responsive to chemotherapy, and only 10% to 20% of cases demonstrate neuroendocrine properties. The present study is a retrospective analysis of the use of immunoperoxidase markers for neuron-specific enolase (NSE), Leu-7, and chromogranin A in NSCLC patients treated with chemotherapy. It was designed to determine if the presence of neuroendocrine markers predict for response to chemotherapy. The diagnostic slides and blocks were obtained on 52 NSCLC patients who were treated with chemotherapy (26 responders and 26 nonresponders). Immunoperoxidase studies were performed, and slides were scored without knowledge of the patient's response. Markers were positive in responders and nonresponders, respectively, as follows: NSE, 14 of 26 (54%) versus seven of 26 (27%), P = .04; Leu-7, 11 of 25 (44%) versus five of 26 (19%), P = .08; and chromogranin A, three of 26 (12%) versus 0 of 26 (0%), P = .71. Two markers were positive in 10 of 26 responders (38%) and 0 of 26 nonresponders (0%), P less than .01. Responders with two or more positive markers showed superior survival (median, 79 weeks) compared with responders with fewer than two positive markers (median, 51 weeks) and nonresponders (median, 27 weeks). These data suggest that the presence of neuroendocrine markers in NSCLC is associated with an increased likelihood of response to chemotherapy and may add to the standard parameters (performance status, weight loss) used to select patients for chemotherapy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.