The densities, infection rates with Loa loa, and parous rates of Chrysops silacea and C. dimidiata were studied in various ecological zones throughout the Chaillu mountains in the People's Republic of the Congo. In the rainy season, C. dimidiata was the major vector in the forest, whereas C. silacea was predominant in the cleared forest zones. Fly densities were higher in the forest (natural forest or palmgrove) than in the villages. Parous and infection rates varied according to the ecological zone. The infection rate of parous females was related to the microfilarial rate in the human population, indicating that the Chrysops populations were extremely stable in the rainy season.
Seasonal activity of the loiasis vectors Chrysops dimidiata Wulp and Chrysops silacea Austen (Diptera: Tabanidae) was studied during 1987-89 in villages and surrounding forest of the Chaillu Mountains, Congo. Chrysops were captured mainly in the hot rainy season (November-May) and densities of both species were higher in the forest than in villages. C.silacea predominated at all sites and C.dimidiata was rarely found in villages. In the rain forest, between 07.00 and 18.00 hours, 12 times more C.silacea and 3 times more C.dimidiata were collected with hand-nets (range 15-81 per man-day) than were caught in landing/biting collections on human bait. Chrysops man-biting rates were higher in villages closer to the forest, but variations in loiasis prevalence among villagers (microfilaraemia rates 16-37%) were not proportional to the intensity of contact between people and vectors in the villages, indicating that the majority of loiasis transmission probably occurs when people go into the forest.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.