BackgroundBurn first aid awareness has been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality. We present a report on the knowledge and practices of the Saudi population with regard to burn first aid and the application of traditional remedies.MethodsAn internet-based survey was conducted to assess the public’s knowledge on first aid practices and home remedies applied for burn injuries among Saudi adults.ResultsA total of 2758 individuals responded to the survey. There were 1178 (42.7 %) respondents who had previously received burn first aid information. One thousand five hundred fifty respondents had a history of burn exposure in which burn injury first aid was applied as follows: 1118 (72.1 %) removed clothing and accessories from the injured area; water was applied by 990 (63.9 %); among those who applied water, 877 (88.6 %) applied cold water; and only 57 (5.8 %) did so for more than 15 min. Wrapping the burn area was performed by 526 (33.9 %), and 985 (63.5 %) sought medical assistance. When it comes to traditional remedies, 2134 (77.4 %) knew of and/or implemented these remedies as first aid or to treat burns. Honey and toothpaste were the commonest among these remedies with 1491 (69.9 %) and 1147 (53.7 %), respectively. This was associated with female gender (r = 0.87, P < 0.001), younger age group (19–25 years) (r = 0.077, P < 0.001), from central region (r = 0.012, P < 0.001), and university graduate (r = 0.05, P = 0.002). Nearly half of those who knew of traditional remedies did not have previous knowledge of burn first aid.ConclusionsProper burn first aid is a simple, cheap, and accessible means of managing burns initially. Although the majority of the respondents were university graduates (51.1 %), knowledge and implementation of burn first aid was very poor. Major healthcare agencies should review and promote a consistent guideline for burn first aid in an effort to tackle and minimize the effect of this grave injury.

No abstract

Introduction Refined mastectomy techniques, the advent of new technologies and materials such as acellular dermal matrix (ADM), cohesive gel silicone implants, and intraoperative tissue perfusion analysis, have fueled a resurgence in prepectoral breast reconstruction. This article aims to compare an immediate direct-to-implant prepectoral ADM-sparing approach with the traditional subpectoral 2-stage immediate reconstruction. A cost analysis within a Canadian-run single-payer system is also presented. Methods A retrospective 2-group comparative chart review study was performed (June 2015–January 2017) to identify all patients who underwent prepectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction using an ADM-sparing technique. The comparison group consisted of patients having undergone traditional 2-stage subpectoral reconstruction with ADM. All countable variables were included in the cost analysis, which was performed in Canadian dollars. Results A total of 77 patients (116 reconstructed breasts) were included. Both the prepectoral and subpectoral groups were comparable in size, demographics including age, diabetic and smoking status, and receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and postmastectomy radiotherapy. Patients having undergone direct-to-implant prepectoral reconstruction benefited from fewer follow-up visits (3.8 vs 5.4, respectively) and from less complications (24.7% vs 35.6%, respectively) including animation deformity. In addition, direct-to-implant prepectoral reconstruction costs 25% less than the 2-stage subpectoral reconstruction when all associated costs were considered. Conclusion Prepectoral implant placement avoids many of the disadvantages of the traditional 2 stage subpectoral reconstruction, including pectoralis muscle dissection, animation deformity, and multiple surgeries. As the first comparative cost analysis study on the subject, our ADM-sparing direct-to-implant prepectoral reconstruction method costs 25% less than the traditional 2-stage subpectoral reconstruction with a comparable complication profile.

Introduction. Medical students experience significant psychological stress and are therefore at higher risk of using sedatives. There are currently no studies describing the prevalence of sedative drug use among medical students in Saudi Arabia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and factors associated with sedative drug use among medical students in Saudi Arabia. Materials and Methods. A cross-sectional convenience sampling study gathered data by anonymous questionnaire from students enrolled at the King Saud University College of Medicine in 2011. The questionnaires collected data regarding social and demographic variables, sleep patterns, and the use of stimulant and sedative drugs since enrollment. Sedatives were defined as any pharmaceutical preparations that induce sleep. Results and Discussion. Of the 729 students who returned questionnaires, 17.0% reported sedative drug use at some time since enrollment. Higher academic year, lower grade point average, regular exercise, fewer hours of sleep per day, poorer quality of sleep, and the presence of sleeping disorders were found to be significantly associated with sedative drug use. Conclusions. Further study is required to increase our understanding of sedative drug use patterns in this relatively high-risk group, as such understanding will help in the development of early intervention programs.

rogressive hemifacial atrophy, or Parry-Romberg syndrome, is a rare disorder characterized by gradual, unilateral atrophy of soft tissue in the face within regions innervated by branches of the trigeminal nerve. 1 One widely used classification system, attributed to Iñigo et al., 2 denotes the disease as mild if atrophy is limited to one trigeminal nerve branch, or moderate if it involves two branches. Severe cases are either those involving all three trigeminal nerve branches, or if there exists any bony involvement. 2,3 Degeneration may persist over the course of 2 to 20 years, until spontaneous quiescence, with an earlier age of onset associated with more severe bony involvement and poorer outcomes, especially in pediatric patients. [4][5][6][7] Although treatment with agents such as steroids, methotrexate, antimalarials, and retinoids may be initiated early on during the disease process in an attempt to curb progression, 8 softtissue reconstruction is often necessary for restoration of form and function. 4,9 Although there exists a

Background: Opioid abuse is a major health concern in North America. Data have shown an alarming increase in opioid-related deaths and complications, which has shed light on current prescription practices across many specialties, including hand surgery. To that end, we sought to conduct a focused literature review to determine the available modalities to decrease postoperative pain and opioid consumption following upper-extremity nerve decompression procedures, taking advantage of the homogeneity and inherent pain pathways of this specific patient cohort. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted. Primary studies evaluating perioperative and intraoperative modalities for postoperative pain reduction and analgesic consumption following upper-extremity nerve decompression procedures under local anesthesia were included. Studies implementing modalities requiring non–hand surgeon expertise (ie, intravenous sedation), as well as studies that include non–nerve decompression procedures, were excluded. Results: A total of 1478 studies were identified, and 9 studies were included after full-text review. Six studies evaluated intraoperative and 3 studies evaluated preoperative and postoperative modalities. Successful interventions included buffered anesthetic, the use of hyaluronidase, and varying techniques and mixtures for anesthetic administration. No successful preoperative or postoperative modalities were identified. Conclusion: Despite data reporting on the dangers associated with current opioid prescription practices, evidence-based modalities to decrease postoperative pain and opioid consumption are limited in general. Several intraoperative modalities do exist, and nonopioid oral analgesics, standardized opioid protocols, and reduced postoperative prescriptions can be used. Large randomized controlled trials evaluating perioperative modalities for pain reduction are needed to further address this issue.

It was concluded that the advancing wheal technique is associated with less pain than the Gale technique.

Although the origins of procedures now falling under the scope of modern plastic surgery date back thousands of years, it was only fairly recently that these were grouped under the umbrella term “plastic” surgery. However, mainly due to the industrialization period, the popular understanding of the term “plastic” would soon change—making way for the addition of the term “reconstructive” to the specialty's name. Through a careful look at historical trends, the authors illustrate how this unintentionally led to an ideological divide between the aesthetic and reconstructive portions of our work, prompting a recent push to unify the field under the one, original, lexical choice: “plastic” surgery.