Asphaltene precipitation has been one of the major problems in the oil industry, and its modeling is still believed to be a quite complex issue due to the different characteristics of thousands of heavy components in crude oil. There have been several attempts to model asphaltene precipitation using various equations of state and empirical models. In the past few years, association models based on CPA and SAFT equations of state have been found to be promising models for studies of asphaltene precipitation. In this work, we compare asphaltene precipitation results obtained from different modeling approaches based on CPA, PC-SAFT with association (PC-SAFT (WA)), and PC-SAFT without association (PC-SAFT (WOA)) models. While the modeling approaches for the CPA and PC-SAFT (WOA) have been described before in various literature, the modeling approach for PC-SAFT (WA) is proposed in this work. All three models require the same number of experimental data points (at least three upper onset pressures and one bubble pressure) in order to obtain model parameters. Different types of asphaltene phase behavior for different reservoir fluids, where asphaltene solubility either decreases or increases with temperature, and where asphaltene precipitation occurs during reservoir fluid depressurization, and the effect of gas injection are studied in order to investigate thoroughly the potential and reliability of the models. A total of five reservoir fluids and one model oil are studied with all three models. It is found that the modeling approach with the CPA EoS is more reliable compared to the other two approaches used in this study. The advantage of the association term to describe interactions between asphaltene and other stock tank oil (STO) heavy components is also evident from this study. The sensitivity of SARA data to the modeling approach based on PC-SAFT (WOA) is also analyzed. Finally, the relationship between the binary interaction parameter of the asphaltene–CO 2 pair and crossover temperature, below which asphaltene solubility increases in reservoir fluid, with CO 2 gas injection is also studied.
Miscible and Immiscible gas flooding is one of the enhanced oil recovery (EOR) techniques that has been widely used to increase the oil production. One of the critical problems with gas flooding is that it generally aggravates the asphaltene precipitation, which further creates a flow assurance problem. Therefore, it is imperative to investigate beforehand, the effect of gas injection into the reservoir, from the modeling results. The Cubic-Plus-Association (CPA) equation of state (EoS) has previously been applied to model asphaltene onset precipitation condition. In this work, we adopt the modeling approach from the previous work and provide the conceptual base for it. Five different reservoir fluids are studied to validate whether the model is able to calculate the effect of different types (e.g.ܰ ଶ , ܱܥ ଶ , methane) and amounts (e.g. 10/20/30 mol%) of gas injections in agreement with experimental data from the literature. We also investigate the model behavior in order to show the importance of the association term in the EoS for the selected modeling approach. Sensitivity of the model results when we calculate either two or three model parameters from the experimental data is also studied. Model dependency on Saturates-Aromatics-Resins-Asphaltenes (SARA) analysis or molecular weight (MW) of asphaltene is also analyzed. In addition, a unique characteristic of the model for the given stock tank oil (STO) is identified, which does not change with different types and amounts of gas injections, and also remains same at upper and lower onset pressure boundaries. Based on this unique characteristic, a simple procedure to predict asphaltene phase envelope (APE) for the reservoir oil with relatively simple and few experimental data, performed on STO with n-pentane/n-heptane as precipitant, is proposed. This proposed procedure avoids the need of high pressure measurements of upper onset pressure (UOP).
Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
The Cubic-Plus-Association (CPA) equation of state (EoS) has already been proven to be a successful model for phase equilibrium calculations for systems containing glycols. In the present work, we interface a thermodynamic property package (ThermoSystem), based on CPA, with Aspen HYSYS through the CAPE-OPEN standards. We, then, simulate certain binary and multicomponent systems where experimental data are available in the literature and which are critical for process design of natural gas dehydration units by triethylene glycol (TEG). We also demonstrate the potential of CPA for the process design of liquid–liquid extraction of aromatic hydrocarbons by TEG. Comparisons between simulation and experimental results are presented in order to illustrate the reliability of ThermoSystem while it is used in a process simulator for industrial applications. Detailed analysis on selecting TEG pure compound parameters and on calculating TEG–water binary parameters is shown. Missing binary interaction parameters are regressed and presented for various binary systems, and a relationship between the interaction parameters and alkane molecular weight is obtained for TEG–alkane binary systems. A simulation case study of a typical natural gas dehydration process is also presented.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.