Osmotic stress is known to affect the cytoskeleton; however, this adaptive response has remained poorly characterized, and the underlying signaling pathways are unexplored. Here we show that hypertonicity induces submembranous de novo F-actin assembly concomitant with the peripheral translocation and colocalization of cortactin and the actin-related protein 2/3 (Arp2/3) complex, which are key components of the actin nucleation machinery. Additionally, hyperosmolarity promotes the association of cortactin with Arp2/3 as revealed by coimmunoprecipitation. Using various truncation or phosphorylation-incompetent mutants, we show that cortactin translocation requires the Arp2/3- or the F-actin binding domain, but the process is independent of the shrinkage-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of cortactin. Looking for an alternative signaling mechanism, we found that hypertonicity stimulates Rac and Cdc42. This appears to be a key event in the osmotically triggered cytoskeletal reorganization, because 1) constitutively active small GTPases translocate cortactin, 2) Rac and cortactin colocalize at the periphery of hypertonically challenged cells, and 3) dominant-negative Rac and Cdc42 inhibit the hypertonicity-provoked cortactin and Arp3 translocation. The Rho family-dependent cytoskeleton remodeling may be an important osmoprotective response that reinforces the cell cortex.

Abnormal smooth muscle contraction may contribute to diseases such as asthma and hypertension. Alterations to myosin light chain kinase or phosphatase change the phosphorylation level of the 20-kDa myosin regulatory light chain (MRLC), increasing Ca 2؉ sensitivity and basal tone. One Rho family GTPase-dependent kinase, Rho-associated kinase (ROK or p160 ROCK ) can induce Ca 2؉-independent contraction of Triton-skinned smooth muscle by phosphorylating MRLC and/or myosin light chain phosphatase. We show that another Rho family GTPase-dependent kinase, p21-activated protein kinase (PAK), induces Triton-skinned smooth muscle contracts independently of calcium to 62 ؎ 12% (n ‫؍‬ 10) of the value observed in presence of calcium. Remarkably, PAK and ROK use different molecular mechanisms to achieve the Ca 2؉ -independent contraction. Like ROK and myosin light chain kinase, PAK phosphorylates MRLC at serine 19 in vitro. However, PAK-induced contraction correlates with enhanced phosphorylation of caldesmon and desmin but not MRLC. The level of MRLC phosphorylation remains similar to that in relaxed muscle fibers (absence of GST-mPAK3 and calcium) even as the force induced by GST-mPAK3 increases from 26 to 70%. Thus, PAK uncouples force generation from MRLC phosphorylation. These data support a model of PAK-induced contraction in which myosin phosphorylation is at least complemented through regulation of thin filament proteins. Because ROK and PAK homologues are present in smooth muscle, they may work in parallel to regulate smooth muscle contraction.

No abstract

No abstract