Gastrin is an important stimulant of acid secretion by gastric parietal cells and is structurally related to the peptide hormone cholecystokinin (CCK).
Dopamine is an important neurotransmitter in the central nervous system of both Drosophila and mammals. Despite the evolutionary distance, functional parallels exist between the fly and mammalian dopaminergic systems, with both playing roles in modulating locomotor activity, sexual function, and the response to drugs of abuse. In mammals, dopamine exerts its effects through either dopamine 1-like (D1-like) or D2-like G protein-coupled receptors. Although pharmacologic data suggest the presence of both receptor subtypes in insects, only cDNAs encoding D1-like proteins have been isolated previously. Here we report the cloning and characterization of a newly discovered Drosophila dopamine receptor. Sequence analysis reveals that this putative protein shares highest homology with known mammalian dopamine 2-like receptors. Eight isoforms of the Drosophila D2-like receptor (DD2R) transcript have been identified, each the result of alternative splicing. The encoded heptahelical receptors range in size from 461 to 606 aa, with variability in the length and sequence of the third intracellular loop. Pharmacologic assessment of three DD2R isoforms, DD2R-606, DD2R-506, and DD2R-461, revealed that among the endogenous biogenic amines, dopamine is most potent at each receptor. As established for mammalian D2-like receptors, stimulation of the Drosophila homologs with dopamine triggers pertussis toxin-sensitive Gi͞o-mediated signaling. The D2-like receptor agonist, bromocriptine, has nanomolar potency at DD2R-606, -506, and -461, whereas multiple D2-like receptor antagonists (as established with mammalian receptors) have markedly reduced if any affinity when assessed at the fly receptor isoforms. The isolation of cDNAs encoding Drosophila D2-like receptors extends the range of apparent parallels between the dopaminergic system in flies and mammals. Pharmacologic and genetic manipulation of the DD2Rs will provide the opportunity to better define the physiologic role of these proteins in vivo and further explore the utility of invertebrates as a model system for understanding dopaminergic function in higher organisms. Dopamine is an essential catecholamine in the central nervous system of both mammals (1) and Drosophila (2). In mammals, dopamine modulates neurologic, cardiovascular, endocrine, and renal functions. In addition, this neurotransmitter regulates motor activity, sexual behavior, and the response to drugs of abuse (1, 3-6). In Drosophila, known dopamine-mediated functions overlap with those of mammals. Experimental evidence suggests that in flies dopamine modulates locomotor activity, sexual function and the response to cocaine, nicotine, and alcohol (7-11).Dopaminergic signaling is mediated through seven transmembrane domain (TM) G protein-coupled receptors that fall within the class A or rhodopsin family based on amino acid homology and conservation of amino acid signature motifs. The dopamine receptor family is divided into two major subfamilies: the D1-like receptors (D1 and D5) and D2-like receptors (D2, D3, and ...
The endocrine cells of the gut are a highly specialized mucosal cell subpopulation. Within the gastrointestinal tract at least 14 different cell types produce a wide range of hormones with a specific regional distribution. The gut endocrine cells belong to the diffuse endocrine system. These cells present two regulated pathways of secretion characterized by large dense core vesicles (LDCV) and synaptic-like microvesicles (SLMV). Gut endocrine cells are recognized by the expression of several "general" markers, including the LDCV marker chromogranin A and the SLMV marker synaptophysin, in addition to the cytosolic markers neuron-specific enolase and protein gene product 9.5. The expression of different hormones identifies specific cell types. The gut endocrine cells are reputed to be terminally differentiated and incapable of proliferation. However, some data suggest that the number of gut endocrine cells may adapt in response to tissue-specific physiological stimuli. Gut endocrine cell differentiation appears to follow a "constitutive" tissue-specific pathway, which may be disrupted and investigated by genetic manipulation in mice. It is suggested that endocrine cell homeostasis is maintained by the entry of new endocrine-committed cells along the differentiation pathway and that such intermediate cells may be sensitive to physiological stimuli as well as transforming agents.
The brain cholecystokinin-B/gastrin receptor (CCK-B/gastrin) has been implicated in mediating anxiety, panic attacks, satiety, and the perception of pain. The canine and human CCK-B/gastrin receptors share 90% amino-acid identity and have similar agonist affinities. These receptors can be selectively blocked by the non-peptide benzodiazepine-based antagonists L365260 (ref. 8) and L364718 (ref. 9); however, the binding of these antagonists to the human and canine receptors differs by up to 20-fold, resulting in a reversal of affinity rank order. Here we report the identification of a single amino acid in the sixth transmembrane domain of the CCK-B/gastrin receptor that corresponds to valine 319 in the human homologue and which is critical in determining the binding affinity for these non-peptide antagonists. We show that it is the variability in the aliphatic side chain of the amino acid in position 319 that confers antagonist specificity. Substitution of valine 319 with a leucine residue decreases the affinity for L365260 20-fold while concomitantly increasing the affinity for L364718. An isoleucine in the same position of the human receptor selectively increases affinity for L364718. Interspecies differences in the aliphatic amino acid occupying this single position selectively affect antagonist affinities without altering the agonist binding profile. We therefore conclude that the residues underlying non-peptide antagonist affinity must differ from those that confer agonist specificity. To our knowledge, these findings are the first example in which a critical antagonist binding determinant for a seven-transmembrane-domain peptide hormone receptor has been identified.
Background Neuropeptides regulate a broad range of physiological and behavioral processes. Elucidation of neuropeptide function requires identifying the cells that respond to neuropeptide signals and determining the molecular, cellular, physiological, and behavioral consequences of activation of their cognate GPCRs in those cells. As a novel tool for answering these questions, we have developed genetically encoded neuropeptides covalently tethered to a glycosylphosphatidyl inositol (GPI) glycolipid anchor on the extracellular leaflet of the plasma membrane (“t-peptides”). Results We show that t-peptides cell-autonomously induce activation of their cognate GPCRs in cells that express both the t-peptide and its receptor. In the neural circuit controlling circadian rest-activity rhythms in Drosophila melanogaster, rhythmic secretion of the neuropeptide Pigment Dispersing Factor (PDF) and activation of its GPCR (PDFR) are important for intercellular communication of phase information and coordination of cellular oscillations of multiple circadian clock neurons. Broad expression of t-PDF in the circadian control circuit overcomes arrhythmicity induced by pdf01 null mutation, most likely due to activation of PDFR in PDFR-expressing clock neurons that do not themselves secrete PDF. More restricted cellular expression of t-PDF suggests that activation of PDFR accelerates cellular timekeeping in some clock neurons, while decelerating others. Conclusions The activation of PDFR in pdf01 null-mutant flies—and thus the absence of PDF-mediated intercellular transfer of phase information—induces strong rhythmicity in constant darkness, thus establishing a distinct role for PDF signaling in the circadian control circuit independent of the intercellular communication of temporal phase information. The t-peptide technology we have developed and validated should provide a useful tool for cellular dissection of bioactive peptide signaling in a variety of organisms and physiological contexts.
Cholera, the pandemic diarrheal disease caused by the gram-negative bacterium Vibrio cholerae, continues to be a major public health challenge in the developing world. Cholera toxin, which is responsible for the voluminous stools of cholera, causes constitutive activation of adenylyl cyclase, resulting in the export of ions into the intestinal lumen. Environmental studies have demonstrated a close association between V. cholerae and many species of arthropods including insects. Here we report the susceptibility of the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, to oral V. cholerae infection through a process that exhibits many of the hallmarks of human disease: (i) death of the fly is dependent on the presence of cholera toxin and is preceded by rapid weight loss; (ii) flies harboring mutant alleles of either adenylyl cyclase, Gsα, or the Gardos K+ channel homolog SK are resistant to V. cholerae infection; and (iii) ingestion of a K+ channel blocker along with V. cholerae protects wild-type flies against death. In mammals, ingestion of as little as 25 μg of cholera toxin results in massive diarrhea. In contrast, we found that ingestion of cholera toxin was not lethal to the fly. However, when cholera toxin was co-administered with a pathogenic strain of V. cholerae carrying a chromosomal deletion of the genes encoding cholera toxin, death of the fly ensued. These findings suggest that additional virulence factors are required for intoxication of the fly that may not be essential for intoxication of mammals. Furthermore, we demonstrate for the first time the mechanism of action of cholera toxin in a whole organism and the utility of D. melanogaster as an accurate, inexpensive model for elucidation of host susceptibility to cholera.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.