The ontogeny of tassels and ears in a perennial Mexican teosinte, Zea perennis (Hitchc.) Reeves and Mangelsdorf, was examined using scanning electron microscopy and light microscopy. Ear development follows a pattern previously described for two annual teosintes, Z. mays subsp. mexicana and Z. mays subsp. parviglumis var. parviglumis (race Balsas), and for the bisexual mixed inflorescence in a diploperennial teosinte, Z. diploperennis; it differs from that described for the ear of Z. diploperennis plants grown at the latitudes of Iowa and Wisconsin. Common bud primordia of the ear are initiated in the axil of distichously arranged bracts along the ear axis. These common primordia bifurcate to form paired pedicellate and sessile spikelet primordia. Development of the pedicellate spikelets in the ear is arrested leaving the sessile spikelets, along with the adjoining rachis segment, to form solitary grains enclosed within cupulate fruitcases. The organogenesis of the central spike of the tassel is similar to that previously described in other Zea taxa. This developmental study supports the hypothesis that both femaleness and maleness are derived from and expressed on a common background; it is consistent with the view that the maize ear was derived from the central spike of a male inflorescence terminating a primary branch of the main axis of the inflorescence.

The ontogeny of tassels and ears in two annual Mexican teosintes, Zea mays subsp. mexicana and Z. mays subsp. parviglumis, was examined using scanning electron microscopy and light microscopy. Ear development in these annual teosintes follows a pattern previously described as leading to the bisexual mixed inflorescence in Z. diploperennis. Common bud primordia are initiated in the axils of distichously arranged bracts along the ear axis. These common primordia bifurcate to form paired sessile and pedicellate spikelet primordia. Development of pedicellate spikelets is arrested leaving the sessile spikelets, along with the adjoining rachis segment, to form solitary grains enclosed within cupulate fruitcases. Development of the central tassel spike is similar to that previously described in the Z. diploperennis tassel, except that the first formed axillary bud primordia form precocious tassel branches. The origin of these tassel branches suggests a possible mechanism for the transition from a distichous spike, characteristic of teosinte, to a polystichous spike, typical of maize.

Tassel and ear primordia were collected from greenhouse‐grown specimens of the Mexican maize landrace Chapalote and prepared for scanning electron microscopic (SEM) examination. Measurements of inflorescence apices and spikelet pair primordia (spp) were made from SEM micrographs. Correlation of inflorescence apex diameter with number of spikelet ranks showed no significant difference between tassels and ears, except at the two‐rank level where the ear apical meristem had a significantly smaller diameter than corresponding two‐ranked tassels. Within individual inflorescences, spp in different ranks enlarged at comparable rates, although the rates from one ear to the next along the stem differed. In both tassels and ears, spp divide to form paired sessile and pedicellate spikelet primordia when the spp is 150 μm wide; ear axes are significantly thicker than tassel axes at the time of bifurcation. The similarities in growth between ear and tassel primordia lend further support to the hypothesis that both the maize tassel and ear are derived from a common inflorescence pattern, a pattern shared with teosinte. Inflorescence primordial growth also suggests that a key character difference between teosinte and maize, distichous vs. polystichous arrangement of spikelets, may be related to size of the apical dome and/or rate of primordium production by the apical meristem. There appears to be more than a single morphological event in the shift from vegetative to reproductive growth. The evocation of axillary buds (ears) is independent of, and temporally separated from, the transition to flowering at the primary shoot apex (tassel).

Vegetative seedlings of the Ceres strain Brassica campestris L., a quantitative, long‐day plant, were induced to flower by exposure to a 16‐hr, long‐day cycle. Cytohistological and cytohistochemical changes associated with inflorescence development were examined. Developing shoot apices were classified in vegetative, transitional, and reproductive stages. The vegetative apex possessed a biseriate tunica, central zone, peripheral zone and pith‐rib meristem. The transitional stage at 48 hr was marked by an increase in size and by a stratification of the upper cell layers of the shoot apex with a concurrent decrease of apical cytohistochemical zonation. The reproductive stage was initiated at 58 hr by periclinal cell divisions in the 3rd and 4th cell layers of the flank region. Cytohistochemical zonation in the vegetative apical meristem was restored in the floral apex. An “intermediate developmental” phase was not observed between the vegetative and reproductive stage.

Inflorescence organogenesis of a wild-type and a gynomonoecious (pistillate) mutant in Tripsacum dactyloides was studied using scanning electron microscopy. SEM (scanning electron microscope) analysis indicated that wild-type T. dactyloides (Eastern gamagrass) expressed a pattern of inflorescence organogenesis that is observed in other members of the subtribe Tripsacinae (Zea: maize and teosinte), family Poaceae. Branch primordia are initiated acropetally along the rachis of wild-type inflorescences in a distichous arrangement. Branch primordia at the base of some inflorescences develop into long branches, which themselves produce an acropetal series of distichous spikelet pair primordia. All other branch primordia function as spikelet pair primordia and bifurcate into pedicellate and sessile spikelet primordia. In all wild-type inflorescences development of the pedicellate spikelets is arrested in the proximal portion of the rachis, and these spikelets abort, leaving two rows of solitary sessile spikelets. Organogenesis of spikelets and florets in wild-type inflorescences is similar to that previously described in maize and the teosintes. Our analysis of gsf1 mutant inflorescences reveals a pattern of development similar to that of the wild type, but differs from the wild type in retaining (1) the pistillate condition in paired spikelets along the distal portion of the rachis and (2) the lower floret in sessile spikelets in the proximal region of the rachis. The gsf1 mutation blocks gynoecial tissue abortion in both the paired-spikelet and the unpaired-spikelet zone. This study supports the hypothesis that both femaleness and maleness in Zea and Tripsacum inflorescences are derived from a common developmental pathway. The pattern of inflorescence development is not inconsistent with the view that the maize ear was derived from a Tripsacum genomic background.