No abstract

Background: Cholera remains a public health threat, but is inequitably distributed, especially affecting areas without universal access to safe water and sanitation, including much of sub-Saharan Africa. Lack of standardized reporting and inconsistent outbreak definitions limit our understanding of cholera outbreak epidemiology. Methods: We curated a database of cholera incidence and mortality from sub-Saharan Africa from 2010 to 2020 and developed methods to reconstruct epidemic curves. We then described the distribution of key outbreak metrics, including outbreak size and duration. Results: We identified 999 suspected cholera outbreaks in 744 unique regions across 25 sub-Saharan Africa countries, and outbreak periods accounted for 1.8 billion person-months (2% of the total during this period) from January 2010 through January 2020. Among the 692 outbreaks reported from second-level administrative units (e.g., districts), the median attack rate was 0.8 per 1,000 people (IQR, 0.3-2.4 per 1,000), the median epidemic duration was 13 weeks (IQR, 8-19), and the median early outbreak reproductive number was 1.8 (range, 1.1-3.5). Rural outbreaks had more than twice the case fatality risk than urban ones (median of 1.8% versus 0.8%). Larger attack rates were associated with longer times to outbreak peak, longer epidemic durations, and lower case fatality risks. Conclusions: Despite reporting gaps and the limitations of analyzing outbreaks by administrative units, this work provides a baseline from which to monitor progress towards cholera control and essential statistics to inform outbreak management and emergency response in sub-Saharan Africa.

Every year, cholera affects 1.3–4.0 million people worldwide with a particularly high presence in Africa. Based on recent studies, effective targeting interventions in hotspots could eliminate up to 50% of cases in Sub-Saharan Africa. Those interventions include Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH) programs whose influence on cholera control, up to the present, has been poorly quantified. Among the few studies available, D'Mello-Guyett et al. underline how the distribution of hygiene kits is a promising form of intervention for cholera control and that the integration of a WASH intervention at the point of admission of suspected cases is new in cholera control efforts, particularly in outbreaks and complex emergencies. Considering the limited number of studies on Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) and water coverages related to cholera control, the aim of our work is to determine whether these interventions in cholera hotspots (geographic areas vulnerable to disease transmission) have significant impact on cholera transmission. In this study, we consider data collected on 125 villages of the Madarounfa district (Niger) during the 2018 cholera outbreak. Using a hurdle model, our findings show that full access to improved sanitation significantly decreases the likelihood of cholera by 91% (P < 0.0001) compared to villages with no access to sanitation at all. Considering only the villages affected by cholera in the studied area, cholera cases decrease by a factor of 4.3 in those villages where there is partial access to at least quality water sources, while full access to improved water sources decreases the cholera cases by a factor of 6.3 when compared to villages without access to water (P < 0.001). In addition, villages without access to safe water and sanitation are 6.7 times (P < 0.0001) more likely to get cholera. Alternatively, villages with full sanitation and water coverage are 9.1 (P < 0.0001) less likely to get cholera. The findings of our study suggest that significant access to improved water and sanitation at the village level offer a strong barrier against cholera transmission. However, it requires full CLTS coverage of the village to observe a strong impact on cholera, as partial access only has a limited impact.