Objective: To present technical details and short-term experiences of liver transplantation as a 2-stage procedure using small for size grafts in a multicenter cohort study. Background: Two-stage liver transplantation using small for size grafts should be a feasible procedure with lower morbidity and mortality rates. Retrospective cohort study between 2015 and 2022 with multicenter experience. Twenty-three resection and partial liver transplantation with delayed total hepatectomy procedures for noncirrhotic indications were performed in 6 European centers (20 with grafts from living donors and 3 after deceased donation). Procedure’s feasibility, graft volumetric changes, morbidity, and mortality of donor and recipient were explored. Results: There was a low donor morbidity (4.3%) in our cohort. Hypertrophy of the graft was rapid (mean graft volume increases 107% between both stages) and offered the opportunity for remnant hepatectomy after a median of 14 days. In all cases, portomesenteric flow was routed to the graft by right remnant portal vein ligation. Portal vein inflow modulation to alleviate transient harmful portal hypertension was not needed in any case. Early postoperative mortality (4.3%) of the recipients were low. Ten patients suffered from complications ≥IIIb according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Conclusions: Two-stage liver transplantation is a feasible option for noncirrhotic patients allowing the safe use of small for size grafts and could possibly be extended with caution to liver diseases with portal hypertension and cirrhosis. The resection and partial liver transplantation with delayed total hepatectomy technique might be a viable option for expanding the donor pool given the current organ shortage especially for low–model of end stage liver disease patients.
Zusammenfassung Hintergrund Der Stellenwert der chirurgischen Therapie hepatopankreatischer Metastasen des oligometastasierten Nierenzellkarzinoms ist Gegenstand der aktuellen Diskussion. Material und Methoden Wir berichten über 51 Patienten, von denen 33 wegen Lebermetastasen und 19 wegen Pankreasmetastasen im Zeitraum von 1995 bis 2018 operiert wurden. Ergebnisse Die 5‑Jahres-Überlebensrate aller Patienten nach Leberteilresektion war statistisch signifikant geringer (38 %, mediane Überlebenszeit 34 Monate) als nach Pankreasresektion (69 %, mediane Überlebenszeit 69 Monaten; p = 0,017). 21 Patienten haben bislang die Metastasenentfernung länger als 5 Jahr überlebt, 4 Patienten länger als 10 Jahre. Bei den R0-resezierten Patienten wurden Rezidive in 13 Fällen nach Leber- und 9 Fällen nach Pankreasresektion beobachtet. Die kumulative Rezidivrate nach 5 Jahren betrug bei der Leber 38 % und beim Pankreas 57 %. Bei R0-Leberteilresektionen erwiesen sich ein Intervall von <24 Monaten zwischen Nephrektomie und Leberresektion sowie multiple Metastasen als negative Prognosefaktoren. Diskussion Unsere Ergebnisse gestatten eine aktive chirurgische Strategie in der Behandlung hepatopankreatischer Metastasen oligometastasierter Nierenzellkarzinome, insbesondere bei kompletter Resektion solitärer, metachroner Metastasen. Wiederholte Eingriffe bei komplett resektablen Metastasen führen zu langen tumorfreien Intervallen und tragen damit zu guten Langzeitergebnissen bei.
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is in most transplant regions a contraindication for liver transplantation, even ruling out an active waiting list registration. However, recent studies showed that well-selected patients after a neo-adjuvant treatment benefit from liver transplantation with good long-term outcomes. The role of living donor liver transplantation is unclear for this indication. The current study focuses on LDLT for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
Background: Extrahepatic body fat could be a relevant factor affecting liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential role of body fatty tissue in liver regeneration capacity after liver resection in a cohort of living donors. Methods:We observed liver regeneration in 120 patients: 70 living donors who underwent right hepatectomy and 50 recipients who got a right graft transplantation. Liver volumetry and body fat analysis were performed based on the computed tomography images with volumetry software. The gain of liver volume was calculated between three points in time considering the absolute and percentage values: before surgery and early (median 10 days, range 4-21) and late (median 27 weeks, range 18-40) after surgery.Pearson's correlation was used to examine the potential correlation between adipose tissue and liver regeneration.Results: Pearson's correlation showed a significant correlation between the subcutaneous fat mass index (sFMI) and early (r=0.173, P=0.030), as well late (r=0.395, P=0.0004) percental liver volume gain in the whole collective. Under stratification in donor's and recipient's collectives, the effect of extrahepatic adipose tissue appears in multiple regression only in the donor's collective: early (β=0.219, T=2.137, P=0.036) and late (β=0.390, T=2.552, P=0.015) percental volume gain.Conclusions: Subcutaneous adipose tissue is a positive predictive factor to estimate the goodness of liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy in normosthenic donors.
Purpose Here, we analyse the technical modification of the ALPPS procedure, ligating the middle hepatic vein during the first step of the operation to enhance remnant liver hypertrophy. Methods In 20 of 37 ALPPS procedures, the middle hepatic vein was ligated during the first step. Hypertrophy of the functional remnant liver volume was assessed in addition to postoperative courses. Results Volumetric analysis showed a significant volume increase, especially for patients with colorectal metastases. Pre-existing liver parenchyma damage (odds ratio = 0.717, p = 0.017) and preoperative chemotherapy were found to be significant predictors (odds ratio = 0.803, p = 0.045) of higher morbidity and mortality. In addition, a survival benefit for maintenance of middle hepatic vein was shown. Conclusion This technical modification of the ALPPS procedure can accentuate future liver remnant volume hypertrophy. The higher morbidity and mortality observed are most likely associated with pre-existing parenchymal damage within this group.
Introduction Induction of liver regeneration represents an option to expand the resectability in patients with expected small future liver remnant (FLR). The aim of this cohort‐study is to compare the liver regeneration between different surgical procedures, including novel procedures such as two‐stage living donor liver transplantation using small‐for‐size grafts. Methods Forty‐three patients with colorectal liver metastases were included between 2004 and 2020. They underwent one of the following three procedures: portal vein embolization (PVE), associated liver partition with portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS), and living donor two‐stage liver transplantation (LT). The volume gain of the future liver remnant was analyzed in comparison between the three mentioned procedures. Results The type of surgery performed had a significant correlation with liver regeneration with a strong effect on the benefit of ALPPS and liver transplantation, respectively (r = .6, p = .00003). The type of surgery was the only independent co‐factor in the multiple regression, which showed a significant influence on FLR‐increase favoring two‐stage transplantation compared to the other two related procedures (ß = .12, T = 3.9, p = .0004). The histological and immunohistochemical studies also showed a clear advantage of proliferation to the benefits of two‐stage liver transplantation compared with ALPPS. Conclusion Two‐stage liver transplantation using small‐for‐size grafts induces better FLR‐increase than portal vein embolization or ALPPS in patients with colorectal liver metastases.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.