TC10, a Rho family GTPase, has been shown to play an important role in the exocytosis of GLUT4 and other proteins, primarily by tethering the vesicles at the plasma membrane. Using a newly developed probe based on fluorescence resonance energy transfer, we found that TC10 activity at tethered vesicles dropped immediately before vesicle fusion in HeLa cells stimulated with epidermal growth factor (EGF), suggesting that GTP hydrolysis by TC10 is a critical step in vesicle fusion. In support of this model, a GTPase-deficient TC10 mutant potently inhibited EGF-induced vesicular fusion in HeLa cells and depolarization-induced neuronal secretion. Furthermore, we found that GTP hydrolysis by TC10 in the vicinity of the plasma membrane was dependent on Rac and the redox-regulated Rho GAP, p190RhoGAP-A. We propose that an EGF-stimulated GAP accelerates GTP hydrolysis of TC10, thereby promoting vesicle fusion.

RalA, a member of the Ras-family GTPases, regulates various cellular functions such as filopodia formation, endocytosis, and exocytosis. On epidermal growth factor (EGF) stimulation, activated Ras recruits guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) for RalA, followed by RalA activation. By using fluorescence resonance energy transfer-based probes for RalA activity, we found that the EGF-induced RalA activation in Cos7 cells was restricted at the EGF-induced nascent lamellipodia, whereas under a similar condition both Ras activation and Ras-dependent translocation of Ral GEFs occurred more diffusely at the plasma membrane. This EGF-induced RalA activation was not observed when lamellipodial protrusion was suppressed by a dominant negative mutant of Rac1, a GTPase-activating protein for Cdc42, inhibitors of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, or inhibitors of actin polymerization. On the other hand, EGF-induced lamellipodial protrusion was inhibited by microinjection of the RalA-binding domains of RalBP1 and Sec5. Furthermore, we found that RalA activity was high at the lamellipodia of migrating Madin-Darby canine kidney cells and that the migration of Madin-Darby canine kidney cells was perturbed by the microinjection of RalBP1-RalA-binding domain. Thus, RalA activation is required for the induction of lamellipodia, and conversely, lamellipodial protrusion seems to be required for the RalA activation, suggesting the presence of a positive feedback loop between RalA activation and lamellipodial protrusion. Our observation also demonstrates that the spatial regulation of RalA is conducted by a mechanism distinct from the temporal regulation conducted by Ras-dependent plasma membrane recruitment of Ral guanine nucleotide exchange factors.

R-Ras is a Ras-family small GTPase that regulates various cellular functions such as apoptosis and cell adhesion. Here, we demonstrate a role of R-Ras in exocytosis. By the use of specific anti-R-Ras antibody, we found that R-Ras was enriched on both early and recycling endosomes in a wide range of cell lines. Using a fluorescence resonance energy transfer-based probe for R-Ras activity, R-Ras activity was found to be higher on endosomes than on the plasma membrane. This high R-Ras activity on the endosomes correlated with the accumulation of an R-Ras effector, the Rgl2/Rlf guanine nucleotide exchange factor for RalA, and also with high RalA activity. The essential role played by R-Ras in inducing high levels of RalA activity on the endosomes was evidenced by the short hairpin RNA (shRNA)-mediated suppression of R-Ras and by the expression of R-Ras GAP. In agreement with the reported role of RalA in exocytosis, the shRNA of either R-Ras or RalA was found to suppress calcium-triggered exocytosis in PC12 pheochromocytoma cells. These data revealed that R-Ras activates RalA on endosomes and that it thereby positively regulates exocytosis. INTRODUCTIONR-Ras is a Ras-family GTPase and its amino acid sequence is 55% identical to those of the classical types of Ras (H-, K-, N-Ras, collectively referred to hereafter as "Ras") (Lowe et al., 1987). As is the case with the other Ras-family GTPases, R-Ras is regulated primarily by two classes of protein, guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) and GTPase-activating protein (GAP). Reflecting the high sequence similarity among Ras-family GTPases, many GEFs and GAPs for R-Ras catalyze other Ras-family GTPases as well (Ohba et al., 2000). Furthermore, R-Ras is known to interact with many effectors of Ras, such as Raf-1, Ral GEFs, and the p110␣ subunit of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) (Rey et al., 1994;Marte et al., 1997). Despite this redundancy between R-Ras and Ras, R-Ras exhibits various properties that are distinct from those of Ras. For example, R-Ras preferentially activates Ral GEFs and PI3K, but it does not activate Raf (Huff et al., 1997;Rodriguez-Viciana et al., 2004). The transforming activity of constitutively active R-Ras is substantially less potent than that of the constitutively active Ras (Cox et al., 1994), although it should be noted that a recent report has suggested the involvement of R-Ras in human gastric cancer (Nishigaki et al., 2005). Meanwhile, R-Ras is known to regulate cell adhesion, cell spreading, and phagocytosis through the activation of integrin (Zhang et al., 1996;Keely et al., 1999; Berrier et al., 2000;Self et al., 2001). R-Ras-null mice have recently been shown to exhibit excessive vascular responses, in spite of the fact that they are otherwise normal (Komatsu and Ruoslahti, 2005). This phenotype seems to reflect higher levels of expression of R-Ras in smooth muscle cells, including blood vessel cells. The results obtained with R-Ras-null mice have also demonstrated that an R-Ras defect can be almost entirely compensated for by other ...

Visualizing how signals are transmitted within a living cell has long been a goal of molecular biologists, which has now been realized by probes based on the principle of fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET). Variants of green fluorescent protein (GFP) enabled the preparation of genetically-encoded FRET probes, and their application has been expanded for use in many areas of biology. The GFP-based FRET probes can be classified as belonging to one of two types, intermolecular and intramolecular FRET probes. The merit of the intermolecular FRET probe lies in the ease of preparation of the probes, whereas the merit of the intramolecular FRET probe lies in the high signal-to-noise ratio. Although these GFP-based probes are powerful tools for the visualization of signal transduction cascades, numerous pitfalls remain associated with this technique. Here, we provide an overview of the GFP-based FRET probes and discuss these issues.