Background and study aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become widely accepted as a minimally invasive treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC), and opportunities to use ESD to treat EGC in elderly patients are increasing. The objective of this study was to elucidate the safety and efficacy of ESD in elderly patients. Patients and methods: Between April 2006 and March 2013, a total of 892 patients with EGC were prospectively recruited to undergo ESD according to definite inclusion criteria. The short-term outcomes and incidence of complications in 345 of these patients who were 75 years of age or older (elderly group) were compared with the short-term outcomes and incidence of complications in the remaining 547 patients (non-elderly group). Factors associated with the occurrence of pneumonia and delirium were also investigated. Results: The R0 resection rate did not differ between the two groups (96.2 % in the elderly group vs. 96.7 % in the non-elderly group; P = 0.65). The incidence of pneumonia (7.5 % vs. 1.8 %; P < 0.01) and incidence of delirium (10.1 % vs. 1.1 %; P < 0.01) were significantly higher in the elderly group. The incidence of post-ESD bleeding and incidence of perforation were similar in the two groups. No emergency surgery was required, but one patient in the non-elderly group died of aspiration pneumonia. On multivariate analysis, age 75 years or older, cerebrovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, delirium, and remnant stomach or gastric tube were independent risk factors for pneumonia, and age 75 years or older, diabetes, dementia, and pneumonia were independent risk factors for delirium. Conclusion: ESD for EGC was feasible for elderly patients in good condition. However, pneumonia and delirium may develop more frequently after ESD in elderly patients with co-morbidities.
A 61-year-old woman diagnosed with cervical cancer received systemic chemotherapy using paclitaxel and bevacizumab. Marked elevation of liver enzyme levels was observed. Ultrasonography and computed tomography showed wall thickening of the extrahepatic and intrahepatic bile ducts accompanied by stricture and dilatation. According to these, she was diagnosed as chemotherapy-induced sclerosing cholangitis (CISC), a form of secondary sclerosing cholangitis. Although CISC triggered by systemic chemotherapy is rare, CISC should be considered as a clinically important adverse event of chemotherapy because it causes rapid deterioration of liver function and necessitates interruption of chemotherapy.
Background: The prognostic factors and treatment strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with a large number of tumor nodules have not been fully elucidated. Clinical factors influencing prognosis were investigated in HCC patients with 30 or more tumor nodules. Methods: Forty-six HCC patients with 30 or more tumor nodules participated in this study. None of them had vascular invasion and extrahepatic metastasis. Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox proportional hazard model were used for analysis. Results: The median survival time of our patients was no more than 15 months, suggesting that patients with 30 or more tumor nodules may be regarded as a progressive subgroup showing poorer prognosis. In multivariate analysis, presence of between 30 and 59 tumor nodules (P = 0.002), male gender (P = 0.002), lower total bilirubin (total bilirubin < 1.0 mg/dL) (P = 0.011), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) as an initial therapy (P = 0.027) and higher prothrombin time (P = 0.049) were significant independent factors for better overall survival. Among 39 patients who underwent TACE as an initial therapy, patients who received sorafenib therapy during follow-up showed better overall survival than those who did not (P = 0.026). Efficacy of sorafenib appeared to be more evident in patients who needed repeated transarterial treatment. Conclusions: In HCC patients with 30 or more tumor nodules, TACE as an initial therapy may be correlated with better prognosis. Sorafenib administration after the prior transarterial treatment may improve antitumor efficacy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations –citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.