ObjectiveTo determine real-world trends in antidiabetic drug use, and persistence and adherence, in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).DesignRetrospective evaluation of administrative claims data (2011–2015) using the Japan Medical Data Center (JMDC) and Medical Data Vision (MDV) databases.SettingAnalysis of two administrative claims databases for Japanese patients with T2DM.ParticipantsAdults (aged ≥18 years) with an International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision code of T2DM and at least one antidiabetic drug prescription.Main outcome measuresTreatment patterns in untreated (UT) or previously treated (PT) patients receiving antidiabetic therapy; persistence with treatment at 12 months; adherence to treatment at 12 months.Results40 908 and 90 421 patients were included from the JMDC and MDV databases, respectively. The most frequently prescribed therapy at the index (first prescription) date was dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) in UT patients (JMDC: 44.0%, MDV: 54.8%) and combination therapy in PT patients (74.6%, 81.1%). Most common combinations were DPP-4i plus: biguanide (BG; 11.4%, 10.9%), sulfonylurea (SU; 8.4%, 11.0%) or BG+SU (7.8%, 9.1%). In UT or PT patients from either database whose index prescription was for any antidiabetic drug class(es) other than DPP-4i, the most frequent add-on or switch was to DPP-4i. 12-month persistence with index monotherapy was highest with DPP-4i and BG. Adherence was high (≥80%) for all monotherapy schedules, except insulin and glucagon-like peptide-1 agonist, and for the five most frequent two-drug and three-drug combinations. Persistence was greater in elderly UT patients and in those receiving ≤5 medications, but comparatively worse in UT patients with ≥3 index antidiabetic drug classes.ConclusionsThe findings indicate that DPP-4i is the most commonly used antidiabetic drug class in Japanese patients with T2DM, and persistence and adherence to this antidiabetic drug class are high.

In 2014, the Japanese Society of Hypertension (JSH) issued revised guidelines for hypertension management. To assess adherence to the guidelines, this retrospective study evaluated the real-world status of antihypertensive drug prescribing for Japanese patients with hypertension, classified by comorbidity: diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, gout/hyperuricemia and renal diseases. Data on 59,867 hypertensive patients who received their first prescription for antihypertensive therapy between April 2014 and March 2015, were obtained from a medical insurance claims database for hospitals participating in the Diagnosis Procedure Combination/Per-Diem payment system. The most common drugs prescribed for each comorbidity subgroup were calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), with prescription rates of around 60-70%. Contrary to JSH recommendations, diuretics and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were prescribed less often than β-blockers. Whereas diabetes mellitus is a compelling indication for use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, CCBs were commonly prescribed in this subgroup. The treatment pattern for patients with comorbid dyslipidemia closely resembled that for the overall patient population. Loop diuretics were prescribed more frequently for patients with renal diseases or gout/hyperuricemia than for those with diabetes mellitus or dyslipidemia. Although antihypertensive drug prescribing varied by comorbidity, JSH 2014 guidelines appeared not to be incorporated adequately into actual clinical practice.

Antihypertensive drugs selected for patients aged ≥75 years differed from those selected for younger patients, in particular CCB and loop diuretics (prescribed more often), and ARB (prescribed less often). Geriatr Gerontol Int 2018; 18: 899-906.

Most common prescriptions were moderate statins in UT patients and combination therapy in PT patients. The high discontinuation rate of HLD therapy in UT patients warrants further investigation and identification of methods to encourage and support long-term persistence.

Fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) for blood pressure control can simplify prescribing, improve medication adherence, and be cost-effective. In Japan, real-world data about the class effects of antihypertensive drugs on medication adherence are limited. Using the nationwide database of medical health claims from Diagnosis Procedure Combination hospitals, treatment patterns and adherence were analyzed for 47,891 patients prescribed antihypertensive medication between April 2014 and March 2015. Adherence was assessed by the proportion of days covered (expressed as % PDC). Patients were prescribed a mean of 2.0 ± 1.0 antihypertensive drugs and 2.4 ± 1.7 pills for their index prescription. Mean adherence overall was 91.5% PDC and was inversely correlated with the number of antihypertensive drugs or pills prescribed on the index date. Mean % PDC was significantly higher (all P < 0.0001) for CCB + ARB versus ARB + thiazide diuretic combinations and for CCB + ARB + β-blocker versus CCB + ARB + thiazide diuretic combinations. Adherence was significantly higher (P < 0.0001) for FDC (CCB + ARB) versus corresponding single-drug combinations, but not for other comparisons of FDCs versus single-drug combinations. On the other hand, FDCs were not always used effectively; specifically, FDCs were frequently used concomitantly with a single agent(s) from the same drug class(es) as the FDC. From the results of our study, no clear differences were observed in medication adherence according to the presence or absence of FDC formulations, and there were cases in which FDCs were not being utilized effectively to simplify prescribing.