Identification of intrinsic disorder in proteins relies in large part on computational predictors, which demands that their accuracy should be high. Since intrinsic disorder carries out a broad range of cellular functions, it is desirable to couple the disorder and disorder function predictions. We report a computational tool, flDPnn, that provides accurate, fast and comprehensive disorder and disorder function predictions from protein sequences. The recent Critical Assessment of protein Intrinsic Disorder prediction (CAID) experiment and results on other test datasets demonstrate that flDPnn offers accurate predictions of disorder, fully disordered proteins and four common disorder functions. These predictions are substantially better than the results of the existing disorder predictors and methods that predict functions of disorder. Ablation tests reveal that the high predictive performance stems from innovative ways used in flDPnn to derive sequence profiles and encode inputs. flDPnn’s webserver is available at http://biomine.cs.vcu.edu/servers/flDPnn/

Molecular recognition features (MoRFs) are short protein-binding regions that undergo disorder-to-order transitions (induced folding) upon binding protein partners. These regions are abundant in nature and can be predicted from protein sequences based on their distinctive sequence signatures. This first-of-its-kind survey covers 14 MoRF predictors and six related methods for the prediction of short protein-binding linear motifs, disordered protein-binding regions and semi-disordered regions. We show that the development of MoRF predictors has accelerated in the recent years. These predictors depend on machine learning-derived models that were generated using training datasets where MoRFs are annotated using putative disorder. Our analysis reveals that they generate accurate predictions. We identified eight methods that offer area under the ROC curve (AUC) ≥ 0.7 on experimentally-validated test datasets. We show that modern MoRF predictors accurately find experimentally annotated MoRFs even though they were trained using the putative disorder annotations. They are relatively highly-cited, particularly the methods available as webservers that on average secure three times more citations than methods without this option. MoRF predictions contribute to the experimental discovery of protein-protein interactions, annotation of protein functions and computational analysis of a variety of proteomes, protein families, and pathways. We outline future development and application directions for these tools, stressing the importance to develop novel tools that would target interactions of disordered regions with other types of partners.

Experimental annotations of intrinsic disorder are available for 0.1% of 147 000 000 of currently sequenced proteins. Over 60 sequence-based disorder predictors were developed to help bridge this gap. Current benchmarks of these methods assess predictive performance on datasets of proteins; however, predictions are often interpreted for individual proteins. We demonstrate that the protein-level predictive performance varies substantially from the dataset-level benchmarks. Thus, we perform first-of-its-kind protein-level assessment for 13 popular disorder predictors using 6200 disorder-annotated proteins. We show that the protein-level distributions are substantially skewed toward high predictive quality while having long tails of poor predictions. Consequently, between 57% and 75% proteins secure higher predictive performance than the currently used dataset-level assessment suggests, but as many as 30% of proteins that are located in the long tails suffer low predictive performance. These proteins typically have relatively high amounts of disorder, in contrast to the mostly structured proteins that are predicted accurately by all 13 methods. Interestingly, each predictor provides the most accurate results for some number of proteins, while the best-performing at the dataset-level method is in fact the best for only about 30% of proteins. Moreover, the majority of proteins are predicted more accurately than the dataset-level performance of the most accurate tool by at least four disorder predictors. While these results suggests that disorder predictors outperform their current benchmark performance for the majority of proteins and that they complement each other, novel tools that accurately identify the hard-to-predict proteins and that make accurate predictions for these proteins are needed.

We present DescribePROT, the database of predicted amino acid-level descriptors of structure and function of proteins. DescribePROT delivers a comprehensive collection of 13 complementary descriptors predicted using 10 popular and accurate algorithms for 83 complete proteomes that cover key model organisms. The current version includes 7.8 billion predictions for close to 600 million amino acids in 1.4 million proteins. The descriptors encompass sequence conservation, position specific scoring matrix, secondary structure, solvent accessibility, intrinsic disorder, disordered linkers, signal peptides, MoRFs and interactions with proteins, DNA and RNAs. Users can search DescribePROT by the amino acid sequence and the UniProt accession number and entry name. The pre-computed results are made available instantaneously. The predictions can be accesses via an interactive graphical interface that allows simultaneous analysis of multiple descriptors and can be also downloaded in structured formats at the protein, proteome and whole database scale. The putative annotations included by DescriPROT are useful for a broad range of studies, including: investigations of protein function, applied projects focusing on therapeutics and diseases, and in the development of predictors for other protein sequence descriptors. Future releases will expand the coverage of DescribePROT. DescribePROT can be accessed at http://biomine.cs.vcu.edu/servers/DESCRIBEPROT/.

This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Motivation Intrinsically disordered protein regions interact with proteins, nucleic acids and lipids. Regions that bind lipids are implicated in a wide spectrum of cellular functions and several human diseases. Motivated by the growing amount of experimental data for these interactions and lack of tools that can predict them from the protein sequence, we develop DisoLipPred, the first predictor of the disordered lipid-binding residues (DLBRs). Results DisoLipPred relies on a deep bidirectional recurrent network that implements three innovative features: transfer learning, bypass module that sidesteps predictions for putative structured residues, and expanded inputs that cover physiochemical properties associated with the protein-lipid interactions. Ablation analysis shows that these features drive predictive quality of DisoLipPred. Tests on an independent test dataset and the yeast proteome reveal that DisoLipPred generates accurate results and that none of the related existing tools can be used to indirectly identify DLBR. We also show that DisoLipPred’s predictions complement the results generated by predictors of the transmembrane regions. Altogether, we conclude that DisoLipPred provides high-quality predictions of DLBRs that complement the currently available methods. Availability DisoLipPred’s webserver is available at http://biomine.cs.vcu.edu/servers/DisoLipPred/ Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

With over 60 disorder predictors, users need help navigating the predictor selection task. We review 28 surveys of disorder predictors, showing that only 11 include assessment of predictive performance. We identify and address a few drawbacks of these past surveys. To this end, we release a novel benchmark dataset with reduced similarity to the training sets of the considered predictors. We use this dataset to perform a first-of-its-kind comparative analysis that targets two large functional families of disordered proteins that interact with proteins and with nucleic acids. We show that limiting sequence similarity between the benchmark and the training datasets has a substantial impact on predictive performance. We also demonstrate that predictive quality is sensitive to the use of the well-annotated order and inclusion of the fully structured proteins in the benchmark datasets, both of which should be considered in future assessments. We identify three predictors that provide favorable results using the new benchmark set. While we find that VSL2B offers the most accurate and robust results overall, ESpritz-DisProt and SPOT-Disorder perform particularly well for disordered proteins. Moreover, we find that predictions for the disordered protein-binding proteins suffer low predictive quality compared to generic disordered proteins and the disordered nucleic acids-binding proteins. This can be explained by the high disorder content of the disordered protein-binding proteins, which makes it difficult for the current methods to accurately identify ordered regions in these proteins. This finding motivates the development of a new generation of methods that would target these difficult-to-predict disordered proteins. We also discuss resources that support users in collecting and identifying high-quality disorder predictions.

No abstract