No abstract

It is recommended that the quality of the implantation result be analyzed carefully and repositioning of the MC be considered in the case of an elevated pressure gradient over the mitral valve.

SummaryAs Japan has one of the most rapidly aging populations in the world, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is likely to be performed in increasing numbers of older people. There is little information on either the efficacy or the safety of TAVI in nonagenarians in Asia.From October 2013 to June 2015, 112 consecutive patients underwent TAVI with Edwards SAPIEN XT valves in our institution. We compared 25 patients aged at least 90 years (mean 91.6 ± 1.7 years) with 87 patients aged under 90 years (mean 82.5 ± 6.0 years) at the time of TAVI. All definitions of clinical endpoints and adverse events were based on the Valve Academic Research Consortium 2 definitions.The median follow-up interval was 561.5 days (the first and third quarters, 405.0 and 735.8 days). Nonagenarians had a higher logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE), Euro II score, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons predictive risk of mortality (STS) score, and a prevalence of clinical frailty scale !4. The rate of device success, and the 30-day and 6-month mortalities were not different between patients aged !90 years and < 90 years (96.0% versus 92.0%, P = 0.68; both 0%, P = 1.00; 4.0% versus 3.5%, P = 0.32, respectively). At six months, clinical efficacy and time-related valve safety were also similar in the two groups (12.5% versus 13.4%, P = 1.00; 4.5% versus 10.3%, P = 0.68, respectively). The cumulative 1-year mortalities were not significantly different between the two groups (8.4% versus 9.4%, P = 0.94, respectively).TAVI can contribute to acceptable clinical results and benefits in a carefully selected group of nonagenarians in Asia.(Int Heart J 2017; 58: 900-907)

No abstract

No abstract