Two rat experiments were run to study the effects of a wide range of signal (CS) intensities on the suppression of licking. In Experiment I, a light CS was varied over five levels, including zero intensity. Conditioned suppression was found to vary directly with CS intensity, but basal lick rates were not different among groups. In Experiment 2, an attempt was made to disturb the basal rate of licking, while a tone CS was varied over four levels, including zero intensity. Here the suppression of the CS rates was found to be directly related and basal rates inversely related to CS intensity. The results as a whole were consistent with the Perkins-Logan hypothesis regarding the effects of CS intensity upon conditioning, but not with the Rescorla-Wagner model of classical conditioning.The intensity of the conditioned stimulus (CS) has been regarded as one of the important variables in both classical and instrumental conditioning experiments. Although the results of these studies are somewhat equivocal (Gray, 1965), they generally support the view that the relation between CS intensity and conditioned response magnitude is positive, a phenomenon known by the Hullian name of "stimulus intensity dynamism" (Hull, 1949).Stimulus intensity dynamism has also been reported in conditioned suppression (Kamin, 1965;Kamin & Brimer, 1963;Kamin & Schaub, 1963). The effects of CS intensity in an aversive conditioning situation, however, can be treated in a completely different manner, as suggested by recent developments in studies of aversive conditioning (lmada & Soga, 1971; Nageishi & lmada, 1974;Odling-Smee, 1975;Seligman, 1968Seligman, , 1969Weiss, 1970). Seligman (1968), for example, had demonstrated that unsignaled shocks produce greater suppression of basal rate of leverpressing than do signaled shocks, a result he explains with his safety signal hypothesis, which assumes that rats under a signaled shock condition learn to discriminate the signal (CS), or more correctly, the signal plus background cues (BC), from the BC alone, and the former comes to serve as a good predictor of danger and the latter of safety. When the shocks are given unsignaled or signaled by a cue of subliminal or zero intensity, no such discrimination should be possible, and hence animals in such a situation would be persistently fearful. Viewed in this way, it becomes immediately obvious that the problem of CS intensity in an on-the-baseline condiThe present research was supported by a grant in aid of research awarded to Hiroshi Imada by the Murao Foundation, Kobe, Japan. tioned suppression experiment can be discussed in terms of discriminability of the CS + BC from the BC alone. Decreasing CS intensity, therefore, should make this discrimination difficult, and thus should lead to the suppression of baseline responding. Unfortunately, in no previous studies of conditioned suppression dealing with CS intensity, has reference been made to the basal rate of responding. Also, in previous studies that dealt with the effect of predictability of shock upon...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.