Heart failure (HF) is a syndrome with global clinical and socioeconomic burden worldwide owing to its poor prognosis. Accumulating evidence has implicated the possible contribution of gut microbiota-derived metabolites, short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), on the pathology of a variety of diseases. The changes of SCFA concentration were reported to be observed in various cardiovascular diseases including HF in experimental animals and humans. HF causes hypoperfusion and/or congestion in the gut, which may lead to lowered production of SCFAs, possibly through the pathological changes of the gut microenvironment including microbiota composition. Recent studies suggest that SCFAs may play a significant role in the pathology of HF, possibly through an agonistic effect on G-protein-coupled receptors, histone deacetylases (HDACs) inhibition, restoration of mitochondrial function, amelioration of cardiac inflammatory response, its utilization as an energy source, and remote effect attributable to a protective effect on the other organs. Collectively, in the pathology of HF, SCFAs might play a significant role as a key mediator in the gut–heart axis. However, these possible mechanisms have not been entirely clarified and need further investigation.
Background
Uninterrupted dabigatran during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is now established as the standard therapy. However, there are few reports on the effects of uninterrupted dabigatran on the intensity of anticoagulation during AF ablation.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed 247 consecutive patients who underwent AF ablation in our hospital from January 2017 to December 2018. Patients who took warfarin or uninterrupted direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) except for dabigatran were excluded. 89 patients underwent ablation with uninterrupted dabigatran (uninterrupted group, male 71, mean age 59.6 ± 14.0) and 124 with interrupted DOACs (interrupted group, male 105, mean age 56.9 ± 12.9) during AF ablation. The initial ACT level, proportion of ACT levels of more than 300 s, and total amount of heparin were compared. Furthermore, the incidence of procedure complications was also evaluated.
Results
The initial ACT levels were significantly higher in the uninterrupted group, and the total number of ACTs of more than 300 s was significantly higher in the uninterrupted group (uninterrupted vs. interrupted; initial ACT level, 315.6 ± 59.8 vs. 264.5 ± 48.6, p < .001; total number of ACTs ≧300, n [%], 304/ 484 [62.8 %] vs. 372/745 [49.9%], p < .001). The total amount of heparin during procedure was significantly lower in the uninterrupted group (uninterrupted group vs. interrupted group; 12966 ± 4773 vs. 16371 ± 5212, p < .001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups.
Conclusions
In the catheter ablation of AF, uninterrupted dabigatran would be useful to obtain a stable anticoagulation status during the entire procedure.
Background The ablation index (AI) has been reported to be useful for a durable pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) to treat atrial fibrillation (AF). No study has reported the optimal AI value for the SVC isolation (SVCI). In this study, we aimed to investigate the optimal AI for the SVCI. Methods Thirty-six AF patients who underwent an initial SVCI were enrolled. Ablation was performed at a total of 549 points. The sites where dormant conduction was induced or additional ablation was needed were defined as touch-up sites (n=36). We compared the energy deliver time, power, CF, Force-Time Integral (FTI), and AI between the touch up sites and control sites (n=513). Results The median RF delivery time, power, CF, and FTI were all significantly lower at the touch up sites (touch up sites vs. control sites; energy delivery time,
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.