Context Clinically used endometrial (EM) receptivity assays are based on transcriptomic patterning of biopsies at midsecretory endometrium (MSE) to identify the possible displacement or disruption of window of implantation (WOI) in patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF). However, biopsies are invasive and cannot be performed in the same cycle with in vitro fertilization embryo transfer, while uterine fluid (UF) analysis is considered minimally invasive and can immediately precede embryo transfer. Objective To determine whether UF proteome can be used for WOI monitoring and whether it would highlight the etiology of RIF. Patients Paired early secretory endometrial (ESE) and MSE UF samples from six fertile control women for discovery, and an additional 11 paired ESE/MSE samples from controls and 29 MSE samples from RIF patients for validation. Results Using discovery mass spectrometry (MS) proteomics we detected 3158 proteins from secretory phase UF of which 367 undergo significant (q < 0.05) proteomic changes while transitioning from ESE to MSE. Forty-five proteins were further validated with targeted MS, and 21 were found to display similar levels between control ESE and RIF MSE, indicating displacement of the WOI. A panel of PGR, NNMT, SLC26A2 and LCN2 demonstrated specificity and sensitivity of 91.7% for distinguishing MSE from ESE samples. The same panel distinguished control MSE samples from RIF MSE with a 91.7% specificity and 96.6% sensitivity. Conclusion UF proteins can be used for estimating uterine receptivity with minimal invasiveness. Women with RIF appear to have altered MSE UF profiles that may contribute to their low IVF success rate.
Purpose To evaluate the association of objectively measured physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviour before and during in vitro fertilization (IVF) with controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) and pregnancy outcomes. Methods This longitudinal study involved 107 infertile women undergoing IVF treatment. PA and sedentary behaviour were measured for 14 consecutive days using accelerometry as follows: (1) before IVF treatment, (2) during IVF at the implantation time, immediately after embryo transfer, and (3) after positive pregnancy test. Total screen time was assessed by questionnaires. COS results were measured as the number of oocytes and embryos obtained, and the study outcomes included positive hCG, clinical pregnancy, and live birth. Results Compared with baseline activity levels, women significantly reduced their PA and increased sedentary behaviour during IVF (p ≤ 0.001). Higher average PA, light PA, and ratio between breaks in every ≥ 30-min blocks of sedentary time showed positive associations, while sedentary time, number, and time accumulated in blocks of ≥ 30 min of sedentary time associated negatively with oocyte and embryo counts (all p < 0.05). Women with high total screen time during non-work days (≥ 7 h) obtained 4.7 oocytes (p = 0.005) and 2.8 embryos (p = 0.008) less in COS. PA and sedentary behaviour before and during IVF did not affect the positive hCG, clinical pregnancy, and live birth outcomes.Key message Higher levels of light physical activity and shorter sedentary behaviour and screen-watching times before entering infertility treatment associate with better ovarian stimulation outcomes under IVF treatment protocols.
The presence and composition of amniotic fluid (AF) microflora, as well as AF glucose concentration and white blood cell (WBC) count, were investigated in 22 consecutive asymptomatic women with intact membranes at mid-gestation. AF was retrieved by trans-abdominal amniocentesis. Three of the 22 women (13.6%) had microorganisms in their AF: Chlamydia trachomatis in 2 and both Corynebacterium group absolute nonfermenter (ANF) group and Propionibacterium spp. in 1. No differences were found in clinical characteristics, glucose concentration or WBC count in patients with and without microorganisms in their AF.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.