Morocco's urban transport sector was characterized until recently by major institutional, regulatory, and operational weaknesses, as a result, public transport systems still perform poorly and are not responsive to the changing demands of the population. In this area, the planning of transport systems (in the context of the overall development of urban regions) takes an increased significance. The Government has thus embarked on a broad program of activities aimed at systematically addressing sector issues, particularly the structural issues that are at the core of the current inefficiencies. In fact, it is important to understand the functioning of decision making processes with respect to transport planning.In order to do so, a comparative study of Moroccan and Spanish decision making processes is done. The paper deals with the differences and similarities of Moroccan and Spanish decision making process in transportation infrastructure planning following the issues cited in Procedures for Recommending Optimal Sustainable Planning of European City Transport Systems (PROSPECTS) Decision Makers' Guidebook (DMG). We have compared the two cases against each other with respect to these issues to identify examples of good practice for the Moroccan case.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.