Background: Over the past 20 years, significant evidence has emerged for collaborative care in the treatment of depression and anxiety disorders in primary care. Purpose: The purpose of this project was to integrate an interprofessional and collaborative care model of behavioral health services into routine nurse-led primary care delivered to vulnerable and underserved populations across the lifespan. Team members included psychiatric nurse practitioners (PMHNPs), a registered nurse, and a case manager. Methods: An Access database was developed to track clients seen by the PMHNPs. Three key outcome measures were tracked over time: Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist Civilian Version, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), and Bipolar Depression Rating Scale (BDRS). A retrospective analysis of client outcome data from January 2017 through December 2019 was conducted. Results: There were 118 patients included who were mostly female (63.6%), White (90.7%), and not Hispanic (69.5%), with Medicaid as their primary insurance (74.6%). For each outcome, models with linear and quadratic function forms for time were fit. The final model for PTSD Checklist Score had a linear functional form for time and the final models for BDRS and HAM-D had linear and quadratic terms for time. All predictors were significantly associated with the outcome. Implications for practice: This program demonstrated that a patient-centered, nurse-led team approach to the treatment of depression, bipolar depression, and PTSD can be successful in primary care.
Problem One in seven children, aged 3–17, have a mental health diagnosis with suicide being the second leading cause of death in the United States in persons aged 10–24. Adolescents are at high risk for mental health disorders, substance use, and risky behaviors, yet most adolescents never receive treatment. Research is needed to answer the question, “What are adolescents' perceived barriers and facilitators to engaging in mental health treatment?” Methods A four‐step qualitative meta‐synthesis design included: A structured research question and search strategy, data immersion through quality appraisal, thematic synthesis of primary research studies, and reciprocal translation of derived themes. Findings Eight studies met inclusion criteria. Autonomy was the primary theme that emerged. Meta‐synthesis produced five subthemes: (a) choice as integral to engagement, (b) stigma as barrier to engagement, (c) quality of the therapeutic relationship as integral to engagement, (d) systemic influences as both barrier and facilitator to engagement, and (e) mental health literacy as crucial factor in decision to engage. Conclusion Adolescents require autonomy to engage in mental health treatment. Improving treatment engagement in adolescents requires interventions that address their ability to be autonomous.
Purpose of the Study: Buprenorphine and methadone, when used as maintenance therapy in opioid use disorder (OUD), can significantly reduce the risk of death after an opioid overdose. Despite the many benefits, medication for OUD (MOUD) remains controversial and underutilized. The aim of this study was to (a) identify studies that explicate the lived experience of MOUD, (b) conduct a methodologically sound critical quality assessment, (c) conduct a metasynthesis of identified qualitative studies, and (d) analyze the results through the lenses of critical social justice, feminist standpoint, and social theories to inform a more culturally responsive, effective, and holistic approach to treatment to increase the utilization of and receptivity to MOUD in the treatment of OUDs. Design and Methods: Metasynthesis is the deliberate process of synthesizing data from multiple qualitative studies to create a new interpretation of previously published research. Our metasynthesis focused on forming a new interpretation of the lived experience of MOUD. Of the 292 studies identified, eight met inclusion criteria. The overall quality of the studies was variable. The study population included adults aged ≥ 18 years with OUD or dependency. Results: Metasynthesis produced three overarching themes: (a) The duplexity of MOUD creates ambivalence in how a person experiences MOUD; (b) the structure of treatment and systemic influences matter, and (c) MOUD as a stepping-stone with multiple meanings in recovery. Implications: Understanding experiential dualities allows professionals to see from other perspectives and can inform interventions and treatment structures as well as serve as a backdrop for social change. The synthesized new meaning of MOUD was an ambivalent experience influenced by intersectionality.
Background: Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a public health crisis and is challenging to treat. Previous research has shown correlations between OUD, abuse/trauma, and chronic pain. Aims: The purpose of this study was to investigate history of lifetime sexual, physical, and/or emotional abuse among participants in a medication-assisted treatment (MAT) program for OUD, and to investigate associations between abuse history and chronic pain. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of intake data from a 2-year, nonexperimental cohort treatment program of patients with OUD in rural Colorado. De-identified data were provided by 476 adult MAT patients using the Adult Addiction Severity Index (ASI-6). The ASI-6 includes three yes/no questions about history of abuse (emotional, physical, and sexual), with separate scoring for “past 30 days” and “lifetime” abuse. Results: Lifetime history among MAT program for OUD patients was 23% for sexual abuse, 43% for physical abuse, and 58% for emotional abuse. History of physical abuse was significantly associated with having a chronic pain diagnosis, χ2 = 4.49, p = .03, and also with higher reported pain levels, t(460) = 2.71, p = .007. Conclusion: Lifetime history of physical abuse was associated with OUD and chronic pain, yet standard pain assessments do not assess these factors. In health care settings, the implementation of standardized trauma-informed screening tools, prompt recognition of abuse/trauma history, and adjunct psychological interventions may reduce stigma, reduce opioid use escalation, and help patients overcome OUD.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.