OBJECTIVES Shared decision making is essential to deprescribing unnecessary or harmful medications in older adults, yet patients' and caregivers' perspectives on medication value and how this affects their willingness to discontinue a medication are poorly understood. We sought to identify the most significant factors that impact the perceived value of a medication from the perspective of patients and caregivers. DESIGN Qualitative study using focus groups conducted in September and October 2018. SETTING Participants from the Pepper Geriatric Research Registry (patients) and the Pitt+Me Registry (caregivers) maintained by the University of Pittsburgh. PARTICIPANTS Six focus groups of community‐dwelling adults aged 65 years or older, or their caregivers, prescribed five or more medications in the preceding 12 months. MEASUREMENTS We sought to identify (1) general views on medication value and what makes medication worth taking; (2) how specific features such as cost or side effects impact perceived value; and (3) reactions to clinical scenarios related to deprescribing. RESULTS We identified four themes. Perceived effectiveness was the primary factor that caused participants to consider a medication to be of high value. Participants considered a medication to be of low value if it adversely affected quality of life. Participants also cited cost when determining value, especially if it resulted in material sacrifices. Participants valued medications prescribed by providers with whom they had good relationships rather than valuing level of training. When presented with clinical scenarios, participants ably weighed these factors when determining the value of a medication and indicated whether they would adhere to a deprescribing recommendation. CONCLUSION We identified that perceived effectiveness, adverse effects on quality of life, cost, and a strong relationship with the prescriber influenced patients' and caregivers' views on medication value. These findings will enable prescribers to engage older patients in shared decision making when deprescribing unnecessary medications and will allow health systems to incorporate patient‐centered assessment of value into systems‐based deprescribing interventions. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:746–753, 2020

No abstract

SummaryBackground/ObjectiveWe have previously shown that an extracellular matrix (ECM) bioscaffold derived from porcine small intestine submucosa (SIS) enhanced the healing of a gap injury of the medial collateral ligament as well as the central third defect of the patellar tendon. With the addition of a hydrogel form of SIS, we found that a transected goat anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) could also be healed. The result begs the research question of whether SIS hydrogel has positive effects on ACL fibroblasts (ACLFs) and thus facilitates ACL healing.MethodsIn the study, ECM-SIS hydrogel was fabricated from the digestion of decellularised and sterilised sheets of SIS derived from αGal-deficient (GalSafe) pigs. As a comparison, a pure collagen hydrogel was also fabricated from commercial collagen type I solution. The morphometrics of hydrogels was assessed with scanning electron microscopy. The ECM-SIS and collagen hydrogels had similar fibre diameters (0.105 ± 0.010 μm vs. 0.114 ± 0.004 μm), fibre orientation (0.51 ± 0.02 vs. 0.52 ± 0.02), and pore size (0.092 ± 0.012 μm vs. 0.087 ± 0.008 μm). The preservation of bioactive properties of SIS hydrogel was assessed by detecting bioactive molecules sensitive to processing and enzyme digestion, such as growth factors fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2) and transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-β1), with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. ACLFs were isolated and expanded in culture from explants of rat ACLs (n = 3). The cells were then seeded on the hydrogels and cultured with 0%, 1%, and 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS) for 3 days and 7 days. Cell attachment was observed using a light microscope and scanning electron microscopy, whereas cell proliferation and matrix production (collagen types I and III) were examined with bromodeoxyuridine assays and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, respectively.ResultsThe results showed that FGF-2 and TGF-β1 in the SIS hydrogel were preserved by 50% (65.9 ± 26.1 ng/g dry SIS) and 90% (4.4 ± 0.6 ng/g dry SIS) relative to their contents in ECM-SIS sheets, respectively. At Day 3 of culture, ACLFs on the SIS hydrogel were found to proliferate 39%, 31%, and 22% more than those on the pure collagen hydrogel at 0%, 1%, and 10% FBS, respectively (p < 0.05). Collagen type I mRNA expression was increased by 150%, 207%, and 100%, respectively, compared to collagen hydrogel (p < 0.05), whereas collagen type III mRNA expression was increased by 123% and 132% at 0% and 1% FBS, respectively (all p < 0.05) but not at 10% FBS. By Day 7, collagen type I mRNA expression was still elevated by 137% and 100% compared to collagen hydrogel at 1% and 10% FBS, respectively (p < 0.05). Yet, collagen type III mRNA levels were not significantly different between the two groups at any FBS concentrations.ConclusionOur data showed that the ECM-SIS hydrogel not only supported the growth of ACLFs, but also promoted their proliferation and matrix production relative to a pure collagen hydrogel. As such, ECM-SIS hydrogel has potential therapeutic value to...

ImportanceWithin the Veterans Health Administration (VA), the use and cost of low-value services delivered by VA facilities or increasingly by VA Community Care (VACC) programs have not been comprehensively quantified.ObjectiveTo quantify veterans’ overall use and cost of low-value services, including VA-delivered care and VA-purchased community care.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cross-sectional study assessed a national population of VA-enrolled veterans. Data on enrollment, sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, and health care services delivered by VA facilities or paid for by the VA through VACC programs were compiled for fiscal year 2018 from the VA Corporate Data Warehouse. Data analysis was conducted from April 2020 to January 2022.Main Outcomes and MeasuresVA administrative data were applied using an established low-value service metric to quantify the use of 29 potentially low-value tests and procedures delivered in VA facilities and by VACC programs across 6 domains: cancer screening, diagnostic and preventive testing, preoperative testing, imaging, cardiovascular testing and procedures, and other procedures. Sensitive and specific criteria were used to determine the low-value service counts per 100 veterans overall, by domain, and by individual service; count and percentage of each low-value service delivered by each setting; and estimated cost of each service.ResultsAmong 5.2 million enrolled veterans, the mean (SD) age was 62.5 (16.0) years, 91.7% were male, 68.0% were non-Hispanic White, and 32.3% received any service through VACC. By specific criteria, 19.6 low-value services per 100 veterans were delivered in VA facilities or by VACC programs, involving 13.6% of veterans at a total cost of $205.8 million. Overall, the most frequently delivered low-value service was prostate-specific antigen testing for men aged 75 years or older (5.9 per 100 veterans); this was also the service with the greatest proportion delivered by VA facilities (98.9%). The costliest low-value services were spinal injections for low back pain ($43.9 million; 21.4% of low-value care spending) and percutaneous coronary intervention for stable coronary disease ($36.8 million; 17.9% of spending).Conclusions and RelevanceThis cross-sectional study found that among veterans enrolled in the VA, more than 1 in 10 have received a low-value service from VA facilities or VACC programs, with approximately $200 million in associated costs. Such information on the use and costs of low-value services are essential to guide the VA’s efforts to reduce delivery and spending on such care.

Background Health systems are increasingly implementing interventions to reduce older patients' use of low‐value medications. However, prescribers' perspectives on medication value and the acceptability of interventions to reduce low‐value prescribing are poorly understood. Objective To identify the characteristics that affect the value of a medication and those factors influencing low‐value prescribing from the perspective of primary care physicians. Design Qualitative study using semi‐structured interviews. Setting Academic and community primary care practices within University of Pittsburgh Medical Center health system. Participants Sixteen primary care physicians. Measurements We elicited 16 prescribers' perspectives on definitions and examples of low‐value prescribing in older adults, the factors that incentivize them to engage in such prescribing, and the characteristics of interventions that would make them less likely to engage in low‐value prescribing. Results We identified three key themes. First, prescribers viewed low‐value prescribing among older adults as common, characterized both by features of the medications themselves and of the particular patients to whom they were prescribed. Second, prescribers described the causes of low‐value prescribing as multifactorial, with factors related to patients, prescribers, and the health system as a whole, making low‐value prescribing a default practice pattern. Third, interventions addressing low‐value prescribing must minimize the cognitive load and time pressures that make low‐value prescribing common. Interventions increasing time pressure or cognitive load, such as increased documentation, were considered less acceptable. Conclusions Our findings demonstrate that low‐value prescribing is a well‐recognized phenomenon, and that interventions to reduce low‐value prescribing must consider physicians' perspectives and address the specific patient, prescriber and health system factors that make low‐value prescribing a default practice.

ImportanceOlder US veterans commonly receive health care outside of the US Veterans Health Administration (VHA) through Medicare, which may increase receipt of low-value care and subsequent care cascades.ObjectiveTo characterize the frequency, cost, and source of low-value prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing and subsequent care cascades among veterans dually enrolled in the VHA and Medicare and to determine whether receiving a PSA test through the VHA vs Medicare is associated with more downstream services.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis retrospective cohort study used VHA and Medicare administrative data from fiscal years (FYs) 2017 to 2018. The study cohort consisted of male US veterans dually enrolled in the VHA and Medicare who were aged 75 years or older without a history of prostate cancer, elevated PSA, prostatectomy, radiation therapy, androgen deprivation therapy, or a urology visit. Data were analyzed from December 15, 2020, to October 20, 2022.ExposuresReceipt of low-value PSA testing.Main Outcomes and MeasuresDifferences in the use and cost of cascade services occurring 6 months after receipt of a low-value PSA test were assessed for veterans who underwent low-value PSA testing in the VHA and Medicare compared with those who did not, adjusted for patient- and facility-level covariates.ResultsThis study included 300 393 male US veterans at risk of undergoing low-value PSA testing. They had a mean (SD) age of 82.6 (5.6) years, and the majority (264 411 [88.0%]) were non-Hispanic White. Of these veterans, 36 459 (12.1%) received a low-value PSA test through the VHA, which was associated with 31.2 (95% CI, 29.2 to 33.2) additional cascade services per 100 veterans and an additional $24.5 (95% CI, $20.8 to $28.1) per veteran compared with the control group. In the same cohort, 17 981 veterans (5.9%) received a PSA test through Medicare, which was associated with 39.3 (95% CI, 37.2 to 41.3) additional cascade services per 100 veterans and an additional $35.9 (95% CI, $31.7 to $40.1) per veteran compared with the control group. When compared directly, veterans who received a PSA test through Medicare experienced 9.9 (95% CI, 9.7 to 10.1) additional cascade services per 100 veterans compared with those who underwent testing within the VHA.Conclusions and RelevanceThe findings of this cohort study suggest that US veterans dually enrolled in the VHA and Medicare commonly experienced low-value PSA testing and subsequent care cascades through both systems in FYs 2017 and 2018. Care cascades occurred more frequently through Medicare compared with the VHA. These findings suggest that low-value PSA testing has substantial downstream implications for patients and may be especially challenging to measure when care occurs in multiple health care systems.

Background Low-value prescribing may result in adverse patient outcomes and increased medical expenditures. Clinicians’ baseline strategies for navigating patient encounters involving low-value prescribing remain poorly understood, making it challenging to develop acceptable deprescribing interventions. Our objective was to characterize primary care physicians’ (PCPs) approaches to reduce low-value prescribing in older adults through qualitative analysis of clinical scenarios. Methods As part of an overarching qualitative study on low-value prescribing, we presented two clinical scenarios involving potential low-value prescribing during semi-structured interviews of 16 academic and community PCPs from general internal medicine, family medicine and geriatrics who care for patients aged greater than or equal to 65. We conducted a qualitative analysis of their responses to identify salient themes related to their approaches to prescribing, deprescribing, and meeting patients’ expectations surrounding low-value prescribing. Results We identified three key themes. First, when deprescribing, PCPs were motivated by their desire to mitigate patient harms and follow medication safety and deprescribing guidelines. Second, PCPs emphasized good communication with patients when navigating patient encounters related to low-value prescribing; and third, while physicians emphasized the importance of shared decision-making, they prioritized patients’ well-being over satisfying their expectations. Conclusions When presented with real-life clinical scenarios, PCPs in our cohort sought to reduce low-value prescribing in a guideline-concordant fashion while maintaining good communication with their patients. This was driven primarily by a desire to minimize the potential for harm. This suggests that barriers other than clinician knowledge may be driving ongoing use of low-value medications in clinical practice.